Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 830–835

Ethical, political, and social aspects of high-technology medicine: Eos and Care

  • Nereo Zamperetti
  • Rinaldo Bellomo
  • Maurizio Dan
  • Claudio Ronco
Clinical Perspective



We discuss biosocial aspects of high-technology medicine (HTM) to provide a global view of the current model of medicine in the developed world and its consequences.


We analyze changes in the concept of death and in the use and cost of HTM. The consequences of HTM on the delivery of basic medical care within and among countries are discussed. Concepts derived from Greek mythology are used to illustrate the problems associated with HTM.


HTM can be extremely effective in individual cases, but it poses important bioethical and biosocial problems. A major problem is related to the possibility of manipulating the process of dying and the consequent alteration in the social concept of death, which, if not carefully regulated, risks transforming medicine into an expensive way of pursuing pointless dreams of immortality (myth of Eos). Another problem is related to the extraordinary amount of resources necessary for HTM. This model of medicine (which is practiced daily) has limited sustainability, can work only in highly developed countries, may contribute to unequal access to health care, and has negligible positive impact on global health and survival.


HTM poses very important biosocial questions that need to be addressed in a wider and transparent debate, in the best interest of society and HTM as well.


  1. 1.
    Lanken PN, Terry PB, Osborne ML (1997) Ethics of allocating intensive care resources. New Horiz 5:38–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Truog RD (2005) Will ethical requirement bring critical care research to a halt? Intensive Care Med 31:338–344CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ad hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death (1968) A definition of irreversible coma: report of the Ad hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death. JAMA 205:85–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jennet B, Plum F (1972) Persistent vegetative state after severe brain damage: a syndrome in search of a name. Lancet I:734–737Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jorgensen EO (1998) Selective neurological recovery or dissociated cardiac death-to be or not to be-during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 36:105–109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fumagalli R, Bombino M, Borelli M, Rossi F, Colombo V, Osculati G, Ferrazzi P, Pesenti A, Gattinoni L (2004) Percutaneous bridge to heart transplantation by venoarterial ECMO and transaortic left ventricular venting. Int J Artif Organs 27:410–413PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dodek P (2005) Surviving sepsis-but for how long? Intensive Care Med 31:171–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mackenzie AF (2005) Activated protein C: do more survive? Intensive Care Med 31:1624–1625CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Le Conte P, Baron D, Trewick D, Touze MD, Longo C, Vial L, Yatim D, Potel G (2004) Withholding and withdrawing life-support therapy in an emergency department: prospective survey. Intensive Care Med 30:2216–2221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ardagh M (2000) Futility has no utility in resuscitation medicine. J Med Ethics 26:396–399CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Randall Curtis J, Park DR, Krone MR, Pearlman RA (1995) Use of the medical futility rationale in do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders. JAMA 273:124–128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ravenscroft AJ (2000) “End-of-life” decision making within intensive care-objective, consistent, defensible? J Med Ethics 26:435–440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sprung CL, Eidelman LA (1996) Worldwide similarities and differences in the forgoing of life-sustaining treatments. Intensive Care Med 22:1003–1005PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Jaeschke R, Reeve J, Spanier A, King D, Molloy W, Willan A, Streiner DL, for the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group (1995) Determinants in Canadian health care workers of the decision to withdraw life support from the critically ill. JAMA 273:703–708CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Prendergast TJ. Claessens MT, Luce JM (1998) A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients: Am J Respir Crit Care Med 158:1163–1167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ferrand E, Robert R, Ingrand P, Lemaire F for the French LATAREA group (2001) Withholding and withdrawal of life support in intensive care units in France: a prospective survey. Lancet 357:9–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vincent JL (1999) Forgoing life support in western European intensive care units: the result of an ethical questionnaire. Crit Care Med 27:1626–1633CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sprung CL, Cohen SL, Sjokvist P, Baras M, Bulow HH, Hovilehto S, Ledoux D, Lippert A, Maia P, Phelan D, Schobersberger W, Wennberg E, Woodcock T; Ethicus Study Group (2003) End-of-life practices in European intensive care units: the Ethicus Study. JAMA 290:790–797CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grande AM, Rinaldi M, Goggi C, Politi P, Viganò M (1998) Heart transplantation without informed consent: discussion of a case. Intensive Care Med 24:251–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vollmann J, Wank M, Weidtmann A, Reinhardt FM (2004) What did she “really” want? Intensive Care Med 30:733CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meisel A, Snyder L, Quill T; American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine End-of-Life Care Consensus Panel (2000) Seven legal barriers to end-of-life care: myths, realities and grains of truth. JAMA 284:2495–2501CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Griffith L, Cook D, Hanna S, Cocker G, Sjokvist P, Dodeck P, Marshall J, Levy M, Varon J, Finfer S, Jaeschke R, Buckingham L, Guyatt G (2004) Clinicians discomfort with life support plans for mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 30:1783–1790CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thorpe KE (2004) Protecting the uninsured. N Engl J Med 315:1479–1481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Roehr B (2005) Quarter of US women postpone or forego treatment because of cost. BMJ 331:130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gwatkin DR, Bhuiya A, Victora CG (2004) Making health systems more equitable. Lancet 364:1273–1280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Keogh BE, Kinsman R; The Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (2002) National adult cardiac surgical database report 2000–2001. Dendrite Clinical System, Henley-on-ThamesGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kher V (2002) End-stage renal disease in developing countries. Kidney Int 62:350–362CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li L (1996) End-stage renal disease in China. Kidney Int 49:287–301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Levy M (2001) End-of-life care in the intensive care unit: can we do better? Crit Care Med 29 [Suppl 2]:N56–N61Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Berlinguer G (2004) Bioethics, health, and inequality. Lancet 364:1086–1091CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Donohoe M (2003) Causes and health consequences of environmental degradation and social injustice. Soc Sci Med 5:573–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Haines A, Cassels A (2004) Can the millennium development goals be attained? BMJ 329:394–397CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zupan J (2005) Perinatal mortality in developing countries. N Engl J Med 352:2047–2048CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Anonymous (2005) G8 2005: a missed opportunity for global health. Lancet 365:177Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Isaacs SL, Schroeder SA (2004) Class—the ignored determinant of the nations' health. N Engl J Med 315:1137–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Reich WT (1995) History of the notion of care. In: Reich WT (ed) Encyclopedia of bioethics, revised edn. Simon & Schuster Macmillan, New York, pp 319–331Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Carlet J, Thijs LG, Antonelli M, Cassell J, Cox P, Hill N, Hinds C, Pimentel J, Reinhart K, Thompson BT (2004) Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU. Statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003. Intensive Care Med 30:770–784CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nereo Zamperetti
    • 1
  • Rinaldo Bellomo
    • 2
  • Maurizio Dan
    • 1
  • Claudio Ronco
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care MedicineSan Bortolo HospitalVicenzaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Intensive CareAustin and Repatriation Medical CenterHeidelbergAustralia
  3. 3.Department of NephrologySan Bortolo HospitalVicenzaItaly

Personalised recommendations