Obstacles to organ donation in Swedish intensive care units
- 191 Downloads
To identify obstacles to organ donation in Swedish intensive care units.
A survey exploring attitudes and experiences of organ donation activities was sent to half of all anaesthetists and all neurosurgeons in Sweden (n = 644). Total response rate was 67%; 69% from the anaesthetists and 54% from the neurosurgeons.
Neurosurgeons had more experiences of caring for potential donors and requesting donation than anaesthetists. Twenty-seven percent of the anaesthetists were not confident with clinical neurological criteria for brain incarceration. Nine per cent found donation activities solely burdensome, and 14% wanted an external team to take over the donation request. A quarter regarded the request definitely as an extra load on the family, and more than half of the respondents had refrained from asking in emotionally strained situations. Forty-nine per cent had a neutral approach to relatives when requesting donation while 38% had a pro-donation approach. Thirty-six per cent terminated ventilator treatment for a potential donor without waiting for total brain infarction. Lack of resources in the ICUs resulted in not identifying a possible donor according to 29% of respondents. Knowing the prior wish of the deceased was regarded as the single most important factor that facilitated the work with organ donation for the intensivists.
The identified obstacles (neutral approach of donation request, ethical problems concerning the potential donor and the relatives, varying competence in diagnosing total brain infarction, and lack of intensive care bed resources) require tailored efforts in order to increase organ donation. Checking these factors can be used as a quality control when analysing donation activities at hospitals.
KeywordsOrgan donation Intensive care Non-therapeutic ventilation Attitudes Medical ethics
- 1.Adam R, McMaster P, O'Grady JG, Castaing D, Jamieson N, Lerut J, Salizzoni M, Pollard S, Muhlbacher F, Rogiers X, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Berenger J, Jaeck D, Moreno-Gonzalez E (2003) Evolution of liver transplantation in Europe: report of the European Liver Transplant Registry. Liver Transpl 9:1231–1243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Landstingsförbundet (The association of county councils) (2004) Vårdbarometern. StockholmGoogle Scholar
- 4.Sanner MA, Nydahl A, Desatnik P, Rizell M (2005) Obstacles to organ donation in Swedish intensive care units. Abstract, 8th Congress of International Society for Organ Donation and Procurement, Gramado, BrazilGoogle Scholar
- 5.Sanner MA, Wiman HS (2003) Two perspectives on organ donation – the experiences of the donor families and the intensive care doctors. Abstract, 7th Congress of International Society for Organ Donation and Procurement, Warsaw, PolandGoogle Scholar
- 6.Blok GA, van Dalen J, Jager KJ, Ryan M, Wijnen RM, Wight C, Ryan M, Wijnen RM, Wight C, Morton JM, Morley M, Cohen B (1999) The European Donor Hospital Education Programme (EDHEP): addressing the training needs of doctors and nurses who break bad news, care for the bereaved, and request donation. Transpl Int 12:161–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Johnson CM, Miller SL, Kurek SJ, Lagares-Garcia JA, Broznick BA, Nathan H. Organ donation: A statewide survey of trauma surgeons. J Trauma 51:110–117Google Scholar
- 12.Pearson IY, Bazeley P, Spencer-Plane, Chapman JR, Robertson P (1995) A survey of families of brain dead patients: Their experiences, attitudes to organ donation and transplantation. Anaesth Intens Care 23:88–95Google Scholar