High-volume hemofiltration as salvage therapy in severe hyperdynamic septic shock
- 377 Downloads
To evaluate the effect of short-term (12-h) high-volume hemofiltration (HVHF) in reversing progressive refractory hypotension and hypoperfusion in patients with severe hyperdynamic septic shock. To evaluate feasibility and tolerance and to compare observed vs. expected hospital mortality.
Design and setting
Prospective, interventional, nonrandomized study in the surgical-medical intensive care unit of an academic tertiary center.
Twenty patients with severe septic shock, previously unresponsive to a multi-intervention approach within a goal-directed, norepinephrine-based algorithm, with increasing norepinephrine (NE) requirements (> 0.3 μg kg–1 min–1) and lactic acidosis.
Single session of 12-h HVHF.
Measurements and results
We measured changes in NE requirements and perfusion parameters every 4 h during HVHF and 6 h thereafter. Eleven patients showed decreased NE requirements and lactate levels (responders). Nine patients did not fulfill these criteria (nonresponders). The NE dose, lactate levels, and heart rates decreased and arterial pH increased significantly in responders. Hospital mortality (40%) was significantly lower than predicted (60%): 67% (6/9) in nonresponders vs. 18% (2/11) in responders. Of 12 survivors 7 required only a single 12-h HVHF session. On logistic regression analysis the only statistically significant predictor of survival was theresponse to HVHF (odds ratio 9).
A single session of HVHF as salvage therapy in the setting of a goal-directed hemodynamic management algorithm may be beneficial in severe refractory hyperdynamic septic-shock patients. This approach may improve hemodynamics and perfusion parameters, acid-base status, and ultimately hospital survival. Moreover, it is feasible, and safe.
KeywordsSeptic shock High-volume hemofiltration Algorithm norepinephrine
- 5.Cariou A, Vinsonneau C, Dhainaut J-F (2004) Adjunctive therapies in sepsis: an evidence-based review. Crit Care Med [Suppl11] :S562–S570Google Scholar
- 7.Honore P, Jamez J, Wauthier M, Lee P, Dugernier T, Pirenne B, Hanique G, Matson J (2000) Prospective evaluation of short-term, high-volume isovolemic hemofiltration on the hemodynamic course and outcome in patients with intractable circulatory failure resulting from septic shock. Crit Care Med 28:3581–3587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Vincent J, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonca A, Bruining H, Reinhart C, Suter P, Thijs L (1996) The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 22:707–710PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Levy M, Pronovost P, Dellinger P, Townsend S, Resar R, Clemmer T, Ramsay G (2004) Sepsis change bundles: converting guidelines into meaningful change in behavior and clinical outcome. Crit Care Med 32 [Suppl]:S595–S597Google Scholar
- 22.Honore PM, Jamez J, Wauthier M,Lee PA, Dugernier T, Pirenne B, Hanique G, Matson JR (2000) Prospective evaluation of short-term, high-volume isovolemic hemofiltration on the hemodynamic course and outcome in patients with intractable circulatory failure resulting from septic shock. Crit Care Med 28:3581–3587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Pinsky MR (2001) Sepsis: a pro- and anti-inflammatory dysequilibrium syndrome. Contrib Nephrol 132:355–366Google Scholar
- 34.Resar R, Pronovost P, Haraden C, Simmonds T, Rainey T, Nolan T (2005) Using a bundle approach to improve ventilator care processes and reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia. Jt Commun J Qual Patient Saf 31:243–248Google Scholar