Studying outcomes of intensive care unit survivors: measuring exposures and outcomes
- 278 Downloads
Measurement of long-term outcomes and the patient and intensive care unit (ICU) factors predicting them present investigators with unique challenges. There is little systematic guidance for measuring these outcomes and exposures within the ICU setting. As a result measurement methods are often variable and noncomparable across studies.
We use examples from the critical care literature to describe measurement as it relates to three key elements of clinical studies: subjects, outcomes and exposures, and time. Using this framework we review the principles and challenges of measurement and make recommendations for long-term outcomes research in the field of critical care medicine.
Relevant challenges discussed include: (a) selection bias and heterogeneity of ICU research subjects, (b) appropriate selection and measurement of outcome and exposure variables, and (c) accounting for the effect of time in the exposure-outcome relationship, including measurement of baseline data and time-varying variables.
Addressing these methodological challenges will advance research aimed at improving the long-term outcomes of ICU survivors.
KeywordsEpidemiological methods Prospective studies Respiratory distress syndrome, adult Process assessment (health care) Risk factors Outcome assessment (health care)
The authors acknowledge the important contributions made by four anonymous peer reviewers.
- 1.Watson RS, Annane D (2002) Assessing outcomes in critical care. J Intensive Care Med 17:103–111Google Scholar
- 7.Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008–2012CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Rothman KJ, Greenland S (1998) Modern epidemiology. Lippincott-Raven, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 12.Damiano AM (1996) The sickness impact profile. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 347–354Google Scholar
- 23.Hayes JA, Black NA, Jenkinson C, Young JD, Rowan KM, Daly K, Ridley S (2000) Outcome measures for adult critical care: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 4:1–111Google Scholar
- 42.Ely EW, Inouye SK, Bernard GR, Gordon S, Francis J, May L, Truman B, Speroff T, Gautam S, Margolin R, Hart RP, Dittus R (2001) Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients: validity and reliability of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU). JAMA 286:2703–2710CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 43.Diggle PJ, Liang K-Y, Zeger SL (1994) Analysis of longitudinal data. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 51.Brower RG, Mattay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A (2000) Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. N Engl J Med 342:1301–1308CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar