Advertisement

Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 31, Issue 5, pp 656–663 | Cite as

Effects of volumetric vs. pressure-guided fluid therapy on postoperative inflammatory response: a prospective, randomized clinical trial

  • Tamas SzakmanyEmail author
  • Ildiko Toth
  • Zsolt Kovacs
  • Tamas Leiner
  • Andras Mikor
  • Tamas Koszegi
  • Zsolt Molnar
Original

Abstract

Objective

To compare intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV) guided fluid management and central venous pressure (CVP) guided therapy in ameliorating the progression of early systemic inflammatory response in patients undergoing major surgery.

Design

Prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Patients

Forty patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were randomized into CVP and ITBV groups.

Interventions

In the CVP group the target CVP was 8–12 mmHg while in the ITBV group the goal was to keep the ITBV between 850 and 950 ml/m2 during the operation.

Measurements and results

Hemodynamic parameters were determined by single arterial thermodilution. Measurements were repeated every 30 min intraoperatively. Serum procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) was monitored preoperatively, on ICU admission, and then daily for 3 days. Serum TNF-α levels were measured intraoperatively hourly and then daily for 3 days. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding hemodynamic parameters at any assessment point. In the overall population changes in the stroke volume index showed a significant correlation with changes in CVP and ITBV. TNF-α levels remained in the normal range intraoperatively and during the three postoperative days in both groups. Preoperatively normal PCT and CRP levels increased significantly postoperatively, without significant differences between the groups.

Conclusions

ITBV guided fluid therapy did not alter the magnitude of inflammatory response as monitored by serum PCT, CRP, and TNF-α in the early postoperative period.

Keywords

Systemic inflammatory response Intrathoracic blood volume index Central venous pressure Procalcitonin Tumor necrosis factor α C-reactive protein 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to Miss Ibolya Orosz for her technical assistance. The study was partially funded by NKFP 1A/0026 research grant, Ministry of Education, Hungary.

References

  1. 1.
    Tandon S, Batchelor A, Bullock R, Gascoigne A, Griffin M, Hayes N, Hing J, Shaw I, Warnell I, Baudouin SV (2001) Peri-operative risk factors for acute lung injury after elective oesophagectomy. Br J Anaesth 86:633–638Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Szakmany T, Molnar Z. Procalcitonin levels do not predict mortality following major abdominal surgery (2003) Can J Anaesth 50:1082–1083Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bennett-Guerrero E, Welsby I, Dunn TJ, Young LR, Wahl TA, Diers TL, Phillips-Bute BG, Newman MF, Mythen MG (1999) The use of a postoperative morbidity survey to evaluate patients with prolonged hospitalization after routine, moderate-risk, elective surgery. Anesth Analg 89:514–519Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sinclair S, James S, Singer M (1997) Intraoperative intravascular volume optimisation and length of hospital stay after repair of proximal femoral fracture: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 315:909–912PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garrison RN, Wilson MA, Matheson PJ, Spain DA (1996) Preoperative saline loading improves outcome after elective, noncardiac surgical procedures. Am Surg 62:223–231Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boldt J, Muller M, Heesen M, Neumann K, Hempelmann GG (1996) Influence of different volume therapies and pentoxifylline infusion on circulating soluble adhesion molecules in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 24:385–391Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wilson RJ, Woods I (2001) Cardiovascular optimization for high-risk surgery. Curr Opin Crit Care 7:195–199Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Backer D, Creteur J, Vincent JL (2003) Perioperative optimization and right heart catheterization: what technique in which patient? Crit Care 7:201–202Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bryson GL (2003) Best evidence in anesthetic practice. Goal-directed therapy with the pulmonary artery catheter is not better than standard therapy. Can J Anaesth 50:614–616Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Della Rocca G, Costa MG, Coccia C, Pompei L, Di Marco P, Vilardi V, Pietropaoli P (2003) Cardiac output monitoring: aortic transpulmonary thermodilution and pulse contour analysis agree with standard thermodilution methods in patients undergoing lung transplantation. Can J Anaesth 50:707–711Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Della Rocca G, Costa MG, Coccia C, Pompei L, Pietropaoli P (2002) Preload and haemodynamic assessment during liver transplantation: a comparison between the pulmonary artery catheter and transpulmonary indicator dilution techniques. Eur J Anaesthesiol 19:868–875Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Della Rocca G, Costa GM, Coccia C, Pompei L, Di Marco P, Pietropaoli P (2002) Preload index: pulmonary artery occlusion pressure versus intrathoracic blood volume monitoring during lung transplantation. Anesth Analg 95:835–843Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B, Peterson E, Tomlanovich M (2001) Early Goal-Directed Therapy Collaborative Group. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 345:1368–1377CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marshall JC, Cook DJ, Christou NV, Bernard GR, Sprung CL, Sibbald WJ (1995) Multiple organ dysfunction score: a reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome. Crit Care Med 23:1638–1652CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mythen MG, Webb AR (1994) Intra-operative gut mucosal hypoperfusion is associated with increased post-operative complications and cost. Intensive Care Med 20:99–104Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shoemaker WC, Wo CC, Thangathurai D, Velmahos G, Belzberg H, Asensio JA, Demetriades D (1999) Hemodynamic patterns of survivors and nonsurvivors during high risk elective surgical operations. World J Surg 23:1264–1270Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Anonymous (1999) Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologist Task Force on Preoperative Fasting. Anesthesiology 90:896–905Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gan TJ, Soppitt A, Maroof M, el-Moalem H, Robertson KM, Moretti E, Dwane P, Glass PS (2002) Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology 97:820–826CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Price J, Sear J, Venn R (2002) Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003004Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mythen MG, Webb AR (1995) Perioperative plasma volume expansion reduces the incidence of gut mucosal hypoperfusion during cardiac surgery. Arch Surg 130:423–429PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sakka SG, Ruhl CC, Pfeiffer UJ, Beale R, McLuckie A, Reinhart K, Meier-Hellmann A (2000) Assessment of cardiac preload and extravascular lung water by single transpulmonary thermodilution. Intensive Care Med 26:180–187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, Beale R, Pfeiffer UJ (1996) Central venous pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, intrathoracic blood volume, and right ventricular end-diastolic volume as indicators of cardiac preload. J Crit Care 11:180–188Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, Habet K, Zanotti S, Marshall S, Neumann A, Ali A, Cheang M, Kavinsky C, Parrillo JE (2004) Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med 32:691–699Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Molnar Z, Szakmany T, Koszegi T (2003) Prophylactic N-acetylcysteine decreases serum CRP but not PCT levels and microalbuminuria following major abdominal surgery. A prospective, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Intensive Care Med 29:749–755Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Buttenschoen K, Buttenschoen DC, Berger D, Vasilescu C, Schafheutle S, Goeltenboth B, Seidelmann M, Beger HG (2001) Endotoxemia and acute-phase proteins in major abdominal surgery. Am J Surg 181:36–43Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lindberg M, Hole A, Johnsen H, Asberg A, Rydning A, Myrvold HE, Bjerve KS (2002) Reference intervals for procalcitonin and C-reactive protein after major abdominal surgery. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 62:189–194Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Assicot M, Gendrel D, Carsin H, Raymond J, Guilbaud J, Bohuon C (1993) High serum procalcitonin concentrations in patients with sepsis and infection. Lancet 341:515–518CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dandona P, Nix D, Wilson MF (1994) Procalcitonin increase after endotoxin injection in normal subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79:1605–1608Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Meisner M, Tschaikowsky K, Hutzler A, Schick C Schutler J (1998) Postoperative plasma concentrations of procalcitonin after different types of surgery. Intensive Care Med 24:680–684Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mimoz O, Benoist JF, Edouard AR, Assicot M, Bohuon C, Samii K (1998) Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein during the early posttraumatic systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Intensive Care Med 24:185–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fries M, Kunz D, Gressner AM, Rossaint R, Kuhlen R (2003) Procalcitonin serum levels after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 59:105–109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tracey KJ, Lowry SF, Cerami A (1988) Cachectin: a hormone that triggers acute shock and chronic cachexia. J Infect Dis 157:413–420Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ackermann M, Reuter M, Flohe S, Bahrami S, Redl H, Schade FU (2001) Cytokine synthesis in the liver of endotoxin-tolerant and normal rats during hemorrhagic shock. J Endotoxin Res 7:105–112Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tang GJ, Kuo CD, Yen TC, Kuo HS, Chan KH, Yien HW, Lee TY (1996) Perioperative plasma concentrations of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6 in infected patients. Crit Care Med 1996 24:423–428Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Okamura JM, Miyagi JM, Terada K, Hokama Y (1990) Potential clinical applications of C-reactive protein J Clin Lab Anal 4:231–235Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Thompson D, Milford-Ward A, Whicher JT (1992) The value of acute phase protein measurements in clinical practice. Ann Clin Biochem 29:123–131Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pettila V, Pentti J, Pettila M, Takkunen O, Jousela I (2002) Predictive value of antithrombin III and serum C-reactive protein concentration in critically ill patients with suspected sepsis. Crit Care Med 30:271–275Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Odegard A, Lundbom J, Myhre HO, Hatlinghus S, Bergh K, Waage A, Bjerve KS, Mollnes TE, Aadahl P, Lie TA, Videm V (2000) The inflammatory response following treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a comparison between open surgery and endovascular repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 19:536–544Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tamas Szakmany
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ildiko Toth
    • 1
  • Zsolt Kovacs
    • 1
  • Tamas Leiner
    • 1
  • Andras Mikor
    • 1
  • Tamas Koszegi
    • 2
  • Zsolt Molnar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive CareUniversity of PécsPécsHungary
  2. 2.Institute of Laboratory MedicineUniversity of PécsPécsHungary

Personalised recommendations