Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 309–312 | Cite as

Transcutaneous arterial carbon dioxide pressure monitoring in critically ill adult patients

  • Pablo Rodriguez
  • François Lellouche
  • Jerome Aboab
  • Christian Brun Buisson
  • Laurent Brochard
Technical Note

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the accuracy of transcutaneous PCO2 (PtcCO2) as a surrogate for arterial PCO2 (PaCO2) in a cohort of adult critically ill patients in a medical intensive care unit (ICU).

Design

Prospective observational study comparing paired measures of transcutaneous and arterial PCO2.

Setting

A 26-bed medical ICU.

Patients

Fifty ICU patients monitored with a SenTec Digital Monitor placed at the ear lobe over prolonged periods.

Results

A total of 189 paired PCO2 measures were obtained. Twenty-one were excluded from analysis, because profound skin vasoconstriction was present (PCO2 bias = −10.8 ± 21.8  mmHg). Finally, 168 were analysed, including 137 obtained during mechanical ventilation and 82 under catecholamine treatment. Body temperature was below 36°C for 27 measurements. Mean duration of monitoring was 17 ± 17 h. The mean difference between PaCO2 and PtcCO2 was −0.2 ± 4.6  mmHg with a tight correlation (R 2 = 0.92, p > 0.01). PCO2 bias did not significantly change among three successive measurements. Changes in PaCO2 and in PtcCO2 between two blood samples were well correlated (R 2 = 0.78, p > 0.01). Variations of more than 8 mmHg in PtcCO2 had 86% sensitivity and 80% specificity to correctly predict similar changes in PaCO2 in the same direction. Catecholamine dose or respiratory support did not affect PtcCO2 accuracy. Hypothermia has only a small effect on accuracy. No complication related to a prolonged use of the sensor was observed

Conclusion

Transcutaneous PCO2 provides a safe and reliable trend-monitoring tool, provided there is no major vasoconstriction.

Keywords

Blood gas monitoring ICU monitoring Transcutaneous 

Supplementary material

134_2005_6_MOESM1_ESM.doc (62 kb)
Electronic Supplementary Material (DOC 63kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Hess DR (1998) Capnometry. In: Tobin M (ed) Principles and practice of intensive care monitoring. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 377–400Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Simon M, Gottschall R, Gugel M, Fritz H, Mohr S, Klein U (2003) Comparison of transcutaneous and endtidal CO2-monitoring for rigid bronchoscopy during high-frequency jet ventilation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 47:861–867PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saura P, Blanch L, Lucangelo U, Fernandez R, Mestre J, Artigas A (1996) Use of capnography to detect hypercapnic episodes during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 22:374–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lucangelo U, Blanch L (2004) Dead space. Intensive Care Med 30:576–579CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Meade MO, Cook DJ (1998) A framework for decision making. In: Tobin M (ed) Principles and practice of intensive care monitoring. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 141–147Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Palmisano BW, Severinghaus JW (1990) Transcutaneous PCO2 and PO2: a multicenter study of accuracy. J Clin Monit 6:189–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Severinghaus JW (1981) A combined transcutaneous PO2-PCO2 electrode with electrochemical HCO3 -stabilization. J Appl Physiol 51:1027–1032PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rodriguez PO, Lellouche F, Aboab J, Brun-Buisson C, Brochard L (2004) Transcutaneous arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure monitoring in ICU patients. Intensive Care Med 30:S168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tremper KK, Shoemaker WC, Shippy CR, Nolan LS (1981) Transcutaneous PCO2 monitoring on adult patients in the ICU and the operating room. Crit Care Med 9:752–755PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weinstein S, Obuchowski NA, Lieber ML (2005) Clinical evaluation of diagnostic tests. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:14–19PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Obuchowski NA (2005) ROC analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:364–372PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rohling R, Biro P (1999) Clinical investigation of a new combined pulse oximetry and carbon dioxide tension sensor in adult anaesthesia. J Clin Monit 15:23–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dullenkopf A, Di Bernardo S, Berger F, Fasnacht M, Gerber A, Weiss M (2003) Evaluation of a new combined SpO2/PtcCO2 sensor in anaesthetized paediatric patients. Paed Anaesth 13:777–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eberhard P, Gisiger PA, Gardaz JP, Spahn DR (2002) Combining transcutaneous blood gas measurement and pulse oximetry. Anesth Analg 94:76–80Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Janssens JP, Howarth-Frey C, Chevrolet JC, Abajo B, Rochat T (1998) Transcutaneous PCO2 to monitor noninvasive mechanical ventilation in adults. Chest 113:768–773PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    SenTec (2002) SenTec Digital Monitor – Mode d'emploi. Therwil, SuisseGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Severinghaus JW (1982) Transcutaneous blood gas analysis. Resp Care 27:152–159Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pablo Rodriguez
    • 1
    • 2
  • François Lellouche
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jerome Aboab
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christian Brun Buisson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Laurent Brochard
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculté MédicineUniversité Paris XIICréteil CedexFrance
  2. 2.Service de Réanimation Médicale et INSERM U 651AP-HP, Hôpital Henri MondorCréteil CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations