Advertisement

Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 30, Issue 8, pp 1681–1684 | Cite as

Catheter-related infection in critically ill patients

  • Leonardo Lorente
  • Jerusalen Villegas
  • María M. Martín
  • Alejandro Jiménez
  • María L. Mora
Brief Report

Abstract

Objective

To describe the incidence of the catheter-related local infection (CRLI) and catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) of central venous catheters (CVCs) and arterial catheters (ACs).

Design

Prospective, observational study.

Setting

A 24-bed medical-surgical intensive care unit of a 650-bed university hospital.

Patients

We included 988 consecutive patients admitted to the ICU during 18 months.

Measurements

The incidence density of CRLI and CRBSI, per 1000 catheter-days, of CVC and AC.

Results

Central venous catheters had a significantly higher incidence density of CRLI (4.74 vs 0.97/1,000 catheter-days; p<0.001) than ACs. Femoral venous access had a higher incidence density of CRLI than subclavian (13.15 vs 1.81/1,000 catheter-days, p=0.003) and than peripheral access (13.15 vs 2.30/1,000 catheter-days, p<0.001). Jugular venous access had a higher incidence density of CRLI (6.29 vs 1.81/1,000 catheter-days, p<0.001) than subclavian access. We found no significant differences in the incidence density of CRLI and CRBSI between the different AC accesses.

Conclusions

In the CDC guidelines, catheter insertion at the subclavian site is recommended in preference to femoral and jugular accesses, and there is no recommendation about AC site insertion. Our data support these recommendations about CVCs. Because the AC infection rate was very low, our study suggests that the access site is probably not of major importance for this type of catheter.

Keywords

Intensive care Catheter infection Bloodstream infection Central venous catheter Arterial catheter 

References

  1. 1.
    Pittet D, Tarara D, Wenzel R (1994) Nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs and attributable mortality. JAMA 271 (20):1598–1601PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maki DG, Weise CE, Sarafin HW (1977) A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous catheter-related infection. N Engl J Med 296:1305–1309PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Hotan TC, Hughes JM (1988) CDC definitions for nosocomial infections 1988. Am J Infect Control 16:128–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pinilla JC, Ross DC, Martin T, Crump H (1983) Study of the incidence of intravascular catheter infection and associated septicaemia in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 11:21–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Damen J, Verhoef J, Bolton DT, Middleton NG, Van der Tweer I, Jonge KD (1985) Microbiologic risk of invasive hemodynamic monitoring in patients undergoing open-heart operation. Crit Care Med 13:548–555PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Merrer J, De Jonghe B, Golliot F, Lefrant JY, Raffy B, Barre E (2001) Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients. JAMA 286:700–707PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goetz AM, Wagener MM, Miller JM, Muder RR (1998) Risk of infection due to central venous catheters: effect of site of placement and catheter type. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 19:842–845PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moro ML, Vigano EF, Cozzi A (1994) Risk factors for central venous catheter-related infections in surgical and intensive care units. The Central Venous Catheter Related Infections Study Group. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 15 (4):253–264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Richet H, Hubert B, Nitemberg G, Andremont A, Buu-Hoy A, Ourba C, Veron M, Boisivon A, Bouvier AM (1990) Prospective multicenter study of vascular-catheter-related complications and risk factors for positive central-catheter culture in intensive care unit patients. J Clin Microbiol 28 (11):2520–2525PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    The National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (1998) National nosocomial infections surveillance (NNIS) system report, data summary from October 1986–April 1998, issued June 1998. Am J Infect Control 26:522–533PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Collignon P, Soni N, Pearson I, Sorrell T, Woods P (1988) Sepsis associated with central vein catheters in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 14:227–231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Furfaro S, Gauthier M, Lacroix J, Nadeau D, Laleur L, Mathews S (1991) Arterial catheter-related infections in children. Am J Dis Child 145:1037–1042PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Norwood SH, Cormier B, McMahon NG, Moss A, Moore V (1988) Prospective study of catheter-related infection during prolonged arterial catheterization. Crit Care Med 16:836–839PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rijnders BJ, Van Wijngaerden E, Wilmer A, Peetermans WE (2003) Use of full sterile barrier precautions during insertion of arterial catheters: a randomized trial. Clin Infect Dis 36 (6):743–748CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Safdar N, Maki DG (2002) Inflammation at the insertion site is not predictive of catheter-related bloodstream infection with short-term, non-cuffed central venous catheters Crit Care Med 30 (12):2632–2635Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rijnders BJA, Van Wijngaerden E, Peetermans WE (2002) Catheter-tip colonization as a surrogate end point in clinical studies on catheter-related bloodstream infection: how strong is the evidence?. Clin Infect Dis 35:1053–1058CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Raad I, Umphrey J, Khan A, Truett LJ, Bodey G (1993) The duration of placement as a predictor of peripheral and pulmonary arterial catheter infections. J Hosp Infect 23:17–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brun-Buisson C, Abrouk F, Legran P, Huet Y, Larabi S, Rapin M (1987) Diagnosis of central venous catheter-related sepsis. Critical level of quantitative tip cultures. Arch Intern Med 147:873–877PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2002) Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. MMWR 51 (RR-10):1–34Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonardo Lorente
    • 1
  • Jerusalen Villegas
    • 1
  • María M. Martín
    • 1
  • Alejandro Jiménez
    • 2
  • María L. Mora
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Intensive CareHospital Universitario de CanariasLa Laguna, Santa Cruz de TenerifeSpain
  2. 2.Research UnitHospital Universitario de CanariasLa Laguna, Santa Cruz de TenerifeSpain

Personalised recommendations