Combined skin disinfection with chlorhexidine/propanol and aqueous povidone-iodine reduces bacterial colonisation of central venous catheters
- 502 Downloads
Central venous catheter (CVC)-related infections may be caused by micro-organisms introduced from the skin surface into deeper tissue at the time of CVC insertion. The optimal disinfection regimen to avoid catheter-related infections has not yet been defined. This study compares three different approaches.
Prospective randomised trial.
A tertiary care hospital.
Patients and participants
One hundred nineteen patients scheduled electively to receive 140 CVCs.
Skin disinfection was performed with either povidone-iodine 10% (PVP-iodine), chlorhexidine 0.5%/propanol 70%, or chlorhexidine 0.5%/propanol 70% followed by PVP-iodine 10%. Prior to disinfection, a swab from the site of insertion was taken for culture. CVCs were removed if no longer needed or infection was suspected. All catheters were cultured quantitatively after removal.
Measurement and results
Bacteria could be isolated from 20.7% of the catheter tips. Bacterial growth was found in 30.8% of the catheters placed after skin disinfection with povidone-iodine, in 24.4% after disinfection with propanol/chlorhexidine and in 4.7% after disinfection with propanol/chlorhexidine followed by povidone-iodine (p=0.006). In 15 cases, the same organism was isolated from the skin swab and the catheter tip. Ten of these paired isolates showed the same pattern in a pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis.
Skin disinfection with propanol/chlorhexidine followed by PVP-iodine was superior in the prevention of microbial CVC colonisation compared to either of the regimens alone. These results support the concept that catheter infections can originate from bacterial translocation at the time of catheter insertion.
KeywordsSkin disinfection Chlorhexidine Propanol Povidone-iodine Central venous catheter Infection Bacterial colonisation
- 2.Grady NP, Alexander M, Dellinger EP, Gerberding JL, Heard SO, Maki DG, Masur H, McCormick RD, Mermel LA, Pearson ML, Raad II, Randolph A, Weinstein RA (2002) Guidelines for prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Healthcare infection control practices advisory committee. MMWR 51/RR-10:1–32Google Scholar
- 4.Raad I, Darouiche R, Dupuis J, Abi-Said D, Gabrielli A, Hachem R, Wall M, Harris R, Jones J, Buzaid A, Robertson C, Shenaq S, Curling P, Burke T, Ericsson C (1997) Central venous catheters coated with minocyclin and rifampin for the prevention of catheter-related colonization and bloodstream infections: a randomized double-blind trial. Ann Intern Med 127:267–274Google Scholar
- 8.Renaud B, Brun-Buisson C, for the ICU-Bacteremia Study Group (2001) Outcomes of primary and catheter-related bacteremia. A cohort and case-control study in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163:1584–1590Google Scholar
- 9.Rello J, Ochagavia A, Sabanes E, Roque M, Mariscal D, Reynaga E, Valles J (2000) Evaluation of outcome of intravenous catheter-related infections in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162:1027–1030Google Scholar
- 11.Lacour M, Gastmeier P, Rüden H, Daschner F (1998) Prävention von Infektionen durch intravasale Katheter. Intensivmed 35:585–592Google Scholar
- 12.Safdar N, Kluger DM, Maki DG (2002) A review of risk factors for catheter-related bloodstream infection caused by percutaneously inserted, noncuffed central venous catheters: implications for preventive strategies. Medicine (Baltimore) 81:466–479Google Scholar
- 16.Mimoz O, Pieroni L, Lawrence C, Edouard A, Costa Y, Samii K, Brun-Buisson C (1996) Prospective, randomized trial of two antiseptic solutions for prevention of central venous or arterial catheter colonization and infection in intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 24:1818–1823CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Garland JS, Buck RK, Maloney P, Durkin DM, Toth-Lloyd S, Duffy M, Szocik P, McAuliffe TL, Goldmann D (1995) Comparison of 10% povidone-iodine and 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate for the prevention of peripheral intravenous catheter colonization in neonates: a prospective trial. Pediatr Infect Dis J 14:510–516PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Humar A, Ostromecki A, Direnfeld J, Marshall JC, Lazar N, Houston PC, Boiteau P, Conly JM (2000) Prospective randomized trial of 10% povidone-iodine versus 0.5% tincture of chlorhexidine as cutaneous antisepsis for prevention of central venous catheter infection. Clin Inf Dis 31:1001–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Mimoz O, Karim A, Mercat A, Cosseron M, Falissard B, Parker F, Richard C, Samii K, Nordmann P (1999) Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine as skin preparation before blood culture. A randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 121:834–837Google Scholar
- 29.Corona ML, Peters SG, Narr BJ, Thompson RL (1190) Infections related to central venous catheters. Mayo Clin Proc 65:979–986Google Scholar
- 31.Gebler H (1998) Tabellen für die pharmazeutische Praxis. Govi, Eschborn p 426Google Scholar