Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 30, Issue 7, pp 1446–1453

Incomplete protection by prophylactic surfactant against the adverse effects of large lung inflations at birth in immature lambs

  • Jónas Ingimarsson
  • Lars J. Björklund
  • Tore Curstedt
  • Saemundur Gudmundsson
  • Anders Larsson
  • Bengt Robertson
  • Olof Werner
Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care



To investigate whether preceding surfactant instillation prevents the harmful effect of large lung inflations at birth in immature lambs, and, if not, to find out for how long the immature lung remains sensitive to large inflations.


In an exploratory study, 12 preterm lambs given surfactant at birth were randomized to receive five large lung inflations at four different times: at birth just before or immediately after surfactant treatment; at 10 min; or at 60 min of age. In a confirmatory study, 10 pairs of preterm lamb twins were all given surfactant before the first breath. One lamb in each pair was randomised to receive large lung inflations immediately after surfactant while the other twin underwent similar inflations at 10–15 min of age.


Animal laboratory.

Experimental animals

Anaesthetized lambs delivered by cesarean section at a gestational age of 127 days.


Surfactant supplementation at birth. Five sustained lung inflations of 16 ml/kg at different times in relation to surfactant instillation. Pressure-limited mechanical ventilation for 4 h.

Measurements and results

The response to surfactant was assessed by ventilator settings, lung mechanics and lung histology. Preceding surfactant supplementation did not prevent the adverse effect of large lung inflations at birth on ventilatory efficiency and lung mechanics, but seemed to protect against severe lung injury. No adverse effect was seen from large lung inflations given at 10 min of age or later.


Prophylactic surfactant supplementation does not fully protect against the harmful effect of large lung inflations during a short sensitive period immediately after birth.


Respiratory distress syndrome Pulmonary surfactants Resuscitation Lung recruitment Animals Newborn 

Supplementary material

supp.pdf (312 kb)
Supplementary Material (PDF 47 KB)


  1. 1.
    Halbower AC, Jones Jr MD (1999) Physiologic reflexes and their impact on resuscitation of the newborn. Clin Perinatol 26:621–627PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Avery ME, Tooley WH, Keller JB, Hurd SS, Bryan MH, Cotton RB, Epstein MF, Fitzhardinge PM, Hansen CB, Hansen TN (1987) Is chronic lung disease in low birth weight infants preventable? A survey of eight centers. Pediatrics 79:26–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garland JS, Buck RK, Allred EN, Leviton A (1995) Hypocarbia before surfactant therapy appears to increase bronchopulmonary dysplasia risk in infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 149:617–622PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Salhab WA, Perlman JM (1998) Initial PaCO2 values at one hour in very low-birthweight infants(VLBW)<1000 g and oxygen requirement at 28 days: are delivery room events important? Pediatr Res 43:193A (Abstract)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van Marter LJ, Allred EN, Pagano M, Sanocka U, Parad R, Moore M, Susser M, Paneth N, Leviton A (2000) Do clinical markers of barotrauma and oxygen toxicity explain interhospital variation in rates of chronic lung disease? The Neonatology Committee for the Developmental Network. Pediatrics 105:1194–1201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jobe AH, Ikegami M (1998) Mechanisms initiating lung injury in the preterm. Early Hum Dev 53:81–94Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clark RH (1999) Support of gas exchange in the delivery room and beyond: How do we avoid hurting the baby we seek to save? Clin Perinatol 26:669–681PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cummings J, Holm B, Nickerson PA, Ferguson WH, Egan E (1995) Pre- versus post-ventilatory surfactant treatment in surfactant-deficient preterm lambs. Reprod Fertil Dev 7:1333–1338PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ikegami M, Kallapur S, Michna J, Jobe AH (2000) Lung injury and surfactant metabolism after hyperventilation of premature lambs. Pediatr Res 47:398–404PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wada K, Jobe AH, Ikegami M (1997) Tidal volume effects on surfactant treatment responses with the initiation of ventilation in preterm lambs. J Appl Physiol 83:1054–1061PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Björklund LJ, Ingimarsson J, Curstedt T, John J, Robertson B, Werner O, Vilstrup CT (1997) Manual ventilation with a few large breaths at birth compromises the therapeutic effect of subsequent surfactant replacement in immature lambs. Pediatr Res 42:348–355PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Björklund LJ, Ingimarsson J, Curstedt T, Larsson A, Robertson B, Werner O (2001) Lung recruitment at birth does not improve lung function in immature lambs receiving surfactant. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 45:986–993CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grossmann G, Nilsson R, Robertson B (1986) Scanning electron microscopy of epithelial lesions induced by artificial ventilation of the immature neonatal lung; the prophylactic effect of surfactant replacement. Eur J Pediatr 145:361–367PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vilstrup CT, Björklund LJ, Werner O, Larsson A (1996) Lung volumes and pressure–volume relations of the respiratory system in small ventilated neonates with severe respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatr Res 39:127–133PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vilstrup CT, Björklund LJ, Larsson A, Lachman B, Werner O (1992) Functional residual capacity and ventilation homogeneity in mechanically ventilated small neonates. J Appl Physiol 73:276–283Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ingimarsson J, Björklund LJ, Curstedt T, Jonson B, Larsson A, Robertson B, Werner O (2001) Uneven distribution of exogenous surfactant after hyperinflation of the lungs at birth in immature lambs. Pediatr Res 49:383A (Abstract)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grossmann G, Robertson B (1975) Lung expansion and the formation of the alveolar lining layer in the fullterm newborn rabbit. Acta Paediatr Scand 64:7–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bland RD, McMillan DD, Bressack MA, Dong L (1980) Clearance of liquid from lungs of newborn rabbits. J Appl Physiol 49:171–177PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Narendran V, Donovan EF, Hoath SB, Akinbi HT, Steichen JJ, Jobe AH (2003) Early bubble CPAP and outcomes in ELBW infants. J Perinatol 23:195–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stenson B (2000) Resuscitation of extremely preterm infants: the influence of positive pressure, surfactant replacement and supplemental oxygen on outcome. In: Hansen T, McIntosh N (eds) Current topics in neonatology, vol 4. Saunders, London, pp 125–148Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Finer NN, Rich W, Craft A, Henderson C (2001) Comparison of methods of bag and mask ventilation for neonatal resuscitation. Resuscitation 49:299–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jónas Ingimarsson
    • 1
  • Lars J. Björklund
    • 2
  • Tore Curstedt
    • 3
  • Saemundur Gudmundsson
    • 4
  • Anders Larsson
    • 5
  • Bengt Robertson
    • 6
  • Olof Werner
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of AnaesthesiologyUniversity Hospital MASMalmöSweden
  2. 2.Department of PaediatricsUniversity HospitalLundSweden
  3. 3.Laboratory for Surfactant Research, Department of Clinical ChemistryKarolinska HospitalStockholmSweden
  4. 4.Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyUniversity Hospital MASMalmöSweden
  5. 5.Department of AnesthesiologyGentofte University HospitalHellerupDenmark
  6. 6.Laboratory for Surfactant Research, Department of Clinical ChemistryKarolinska HospitalStockholmSweden
  7. 7.Department of Paediatric AnaesthesiaUniversity HospitalLundSweden

Personalised recommendations