Effect of large volume infusion on left ventricular volumes, performance and contractility parameters in normal volunteers
- 219 Downloads
Characterize the normal human cardiovascular response to large volume infusion of normal saline.
Prospective, interventional trial.
ICU procedure room.
Healthy male volunteers (n=32).
Volumetric echocardiography during 4-L saline infusion (3 L over 3 h followed by 1 L over 2 h).
Measurements and results
Following 3-L saline infusion, stroke volume and cardiac output increased approximately 10% without a significant change in heart rate or blood pressure. A decrease in end-systolic volume contributed to the increase in stroke volume to an extent similar to that provided by the increase in end-diastolic volume. All contractility indices except end-systolic wall stress/end-systolic volume index were increased at 3 h post-initiation of saline infusion. Stroke volume but not cardiac output remained elevated at 5 h with persistence of ventricular volume responses; only ejection fraction was significantly elevated among the contractility indices. Afterload measures including total peripheral resistance and end-systolic wall stress were significantly decreased after 3-L infusion but were unchanged compared to baseline following infusion of an additional 1 L over 2 h. Modeled blood viscosity studies demonstrate that changes in apparent contractility after 3-L saline infusion can be explained solely by viscosity reduction associated with hypervolemic hemodilution.
The initial increase in stroke volume associated with high volume saline infusion in normal volunteers is associated with increases of most load-dependent and ostensibly load-independent parameters of left ventricular contractility. This phenomenon is unlikely to represent a true increase in contractility and appears to be caused by reduced afterload as a consequence of decreased blood viscosity. This decrease in blood viscosity may complicate analysis of some previous in vivo studies examining the effect of volume loading on cardiac function using low-viscosity solutions.
KeywordsVolunteers Saline Resuscitation Heart Cardiac output Contractility
- 1.Patterson SW, Starling EH (1914) On the mechanical factors which determine the output of the ventricles. J Physiol 48:357–379Google Scholar
- 2.Stead EA, Warren JV (1947) Cardiac output in man: analysis of mechanisms of varying cardiac output based on recent clinical studies. Arch Intern Med 80:237Google Scholar
- 3.Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, Zanotti S, Habet K, Haery C, Marshall S, Neumann A, Ali A, Kavinsky C, Parrillo JE (2004) Preload-independent mechanisms are partially responsible for improved cardiac output following large volume saline infusion in normal volunteers. Crit Care 8:R128–R136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Carabello BA (1989) Ratio of end-systolic wall stress to end-systolic volume: Is it a useful clinical tool? J Am Coll Cardiol 14:496–498Google Scholar
- 13.Sagawa K (1981) The end-systolic pressure-volume relation of the ventricle: definition, modifications and clinical use. Circulation 63:1223–1227Google Scholar
- 20.Urzua J, Zurick AM, Starr NJ, Cosgrove DM, Yared JP, Estafanous FG (1985) Enhanced cardiac performance following cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiovasc Surg 26:53–58Google Scholar
- 21.Fowler NO, Holmes JC (1975) Blood viscosity and cardiac output in acute experimental anemia. J Appl Physiol 9:453–456Google Scholar
- 23.Ohki S, Ishikawa S, Ohtaki A, Takahashi T, Koyano T, Otani Y, Murakami J, Mohara J, Isa Y, Kunimoto F, Morishita Y (1999) Hemodynamic effects of alpha-human atrial natriuretic polypeptide on patients undergoing open-heart surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg 40:781–785Google Scholar
- 25.McDowell RJS (1924) A vago-pressor reflex. J Physiol 59:41–53Google Scholar