Different techniques to measure intra-abdominal pressure (IAP): time for a critical re-appraisal
- 1.8k Downloads
The diagnosis of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) or abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is heavily dependant on the reproducibility of the intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurement technique. Recent studies have shown that a clinical estimation of IAP by abdominal girth or by examiner’s feel of the tenseness of the abdomen is far from accurate, with a sensitivity of around 40%. Consequently, the IAP needs to be measured with a more accurate, reproducible and reliable tool. The role of the intra-vesical pressure (IVP) as the gold standard for IAP has become a matter of debate. This review will focus on the previously described indirect IAP measurement techniques and will suggest new revised methods of IVP measurement less prone to error. Cost-effective manometry screening techniques will be discussed, as well as some options for the future with microchip transducers.
KeywordsIntra-abdominal pressure Intra-abdominal hypertension Abdominal compartment syndrome Intra-vesical pressure
I am indebted to my wife, Ms. Bieke Depré, for her patience, advice and technical assistance with the preparation of this manuscript, and to my three sons for providing a quiet writing environment. I also thank Dr. Rao Ivatury and Julia Wendon for their English editing of the manuscript. Part of this work was presented at: the 14th Annual Congress of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland, 30 September–3 October 2001; the 22nd International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Brussels, Belgium, 19–22 March 2002; the 13th Symposium Intensivmedizin and Intensivpflege, Bremen, Germany, 19–21 February 2003; the 23rd International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Brussels, Belgium, 18–21 March 2003; the 16th Annual Congress of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 5–8 October 2003. This study was supported by Holtech Medical, Denmark (contact Bo Holte at email@example.com). There was no financial support from Holtech other than making the product (Foleymanometer) available, free of charge. This study was supported by Ackrad Medical, USA (contact Charles Noto at firstname.lastname@example.org). There was no financial support from Ackrad other than making five oesophageal balloon catheters available, free of charge. This study was supported by Spiegelberg, Germany (contact Andreas Spiegelberg at email@example.com). There was no financial support from Spiegelberg other than making the gastric balloon IAP-catheters and IAP-monitors available for study purposes, free of charge.
- 1.Malbrain MLNG (2001) Intra-abdominal pressure in the Intensive Care Unit: clinical tool or toy? In: Vincent JL (ed) Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 547–585Google Scholar
- 2.Malbrain MLNG (2002) Abdominal perfusion pressure as a prognostic marker in intra-abdominal hypertension. In: Vincent JL (ed) Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 792–814Google Scholar
- 4.Malbrain MLNG, for the CIAH study group (2001) Prevalence of intra-abdominal hypertension in the ICU. Intensive Care Med 27 (Suppl 2):S176Google Scholar
- 6.Gudmundsson FF, Viste A, Gislason H, Svanes K (2002) Comparison of different methods for measuring intra-abdominal pressure. Intensive Care Med 28:509–514Google Scholar
- 14.Darovic GO, Vanriper S, Vanriper J (1995) In: Darovic GO (Ed) Hemodynamic monitoring, 2nd edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 149–175Google Scholar
- 19.Sagraves SG; Cheatham ML; Johnson JL; White M; Block EF; Nelson LD (1997) Intravesicular pressure monitoring does not increase the risk of urinary tract or systemic infection. Crit Care Med 27:A48Google Scholar
- 22.Debaveye Y, Bertieaux S, Malbrain M (2000) Simultaneous measurement of intra-abdominal pressure and regional CO2 via a gastric tonometer. Intensive Care Med 26 (Suppl 3):S324Google Scholar
- 23.Malbrain MLNG (2003) Validation of a novel fully automated continuous method to measure intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). Intensive Care Med 29 (Suppl 1):S73Google Scholar
- 29.Lacey SR, Bruce J, Brooks SP, Griswald J, Ferguson W, Allen JE, Jewett TC, Karp MP, Cooney DR (1987) The relative merits of various methods of indirect measurement of intra-abdominal pressure as a guide to closure of abdominal wall defects. J Ped Surg 22:1207–1211Google Scholar