Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 29, Issue 12, pp 2330–2335

Do different mattresses affect the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation?

  • Gavin D. Perkins
  • Robert Benny
  • Simon Giles
  • Fang Gao
  • Michael J. Tweed
Original

Abstract

Objective

To determine the effect of different mattresses on cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance and establish whether emergency deflation of an inflatable mattress improves the quality of resuscitation.

Design and setting

Randomised controlled cross-over trial performed in a general ICU

Participants

Critical care staff from a general ICU.

Interventions

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation on a manikin on the floor or on a bed with a standard foam mattress and inflated and deflated pressure redistributing mattresses. Maximal compression force was measured at different bed heights.

Measurements and results

Compression depth, duty cycle and rate and percentage correct expired air ventilation were recorded on a manikin. Compression depth was significantly lower on the foam (35.2 mm), inflated (37.2 mm) and deflated mattress (39.1 mm) than the floor (44.2 mm). There were no clinically important differences in duty cycle or compression rate. The quality of ventilation was poor on all surfaces. Maximal compression force declined as bed height increased.

Conclusions

Resuscitation performance is adversely affected when performed on a bed (irrespective of mattress type) compared to the floor. There were no differences between the inflated and deflated mattresses, although the deflation process did not adversely affect performance. This study does not support the routine deflation of an inflated mattress during resuscitation and questions the potential benefits from using a backboard. The finding that bed height affects maximal compression forces, challenges the recommendation that cardiopulmonary resuscitation be performed with the bed at middle-thigh level and requires further investigation.

Keywords

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation Pressure ulcers Support surface Basic life support External chest compression 

Reference

  1. 1.
    Franklin C, Mathew J (1994) Developing strategies to prevent in hospital cardiac arrest: analyzing responses of physicians and nurses in the hours before the event. Crit Care Med 22:244–247PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Keller BPJA, Wille J, Ramshorst B, Werken C (2002) Pressure ulcers in intensive care patients: a review of risks and prevention. Intensive Care Med 28:1379–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    European Resuscitation Council (2000) Adult basic life support. III. Resuscitation 46:29–71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wik L, Myklebust H, Auestad BH, Steen PA (2002) Retention of basic life support skills 6 months after training with an automated voice advisory manikin system without instructor involvement. Resuscitation 52:273–279CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Resuscitation Council (2000) Guidance for safer handling during resuscitation in hospital. Resuscitation Council, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tweed M, Tweed C, Perkins GD (2001) The effect of differing support surfaces on the efficacy of chest compressions using a resuscitation manikin model. Resuscitation 51:179–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Robertson C, Holmberg S (1992) Compression techniques and blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A statement for the Advanced Life Support Working Party of the European Resuscitation Council. Resuscitation 24:123–132PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wik L, Steen PA, Bircher NG (1994) Quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation influences outcome after prehospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 28:195–203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maier GW, Newton JR Jr, Wolfe JA, Tyson GS Jr, Olsen CO, Glower DD, Spratt JA, Davis JW, Feneley MP, Rankin JS (1986) The influence of manual chest compression rate on hemodynamic support during cardiac arrest: high-impulse cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation 74:IV51–IV59PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Babbs CF, Thelander K (1995) Theoretically optimal duty cycles for chest and abdominal compression during external cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Acad Emerg Med 2:698–707PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Babbs CF, Voorhees WD, Fitzgerald KR, Holmes HR, Geddes LA (1983) Relationship of blood pressure and flow during CPR to chest compression amplitude: evidence for an effective compression threshold. Ann Emerg Med 12:527–532PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bellamy RF, DeGuzman LR, Pedersen DC (1984) Coronary blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in swine. Circulation 69:174–180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wik L, Naess PA, Ilebekk A, Nicolaysen G, Steen PA (1996) Effects of various degrees of compression and active decompression on haemodynamics, end-tidal CO2, and ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of pigs. Resuscitation 31:45–57CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wolfe JA, Maier GW, Newton JR Jr, Glower DD, Tyson GS Jr, Spratt JA, Rankin JS, Olsen CO (1988) Physiologic determinants of coronary blood flow during external cardiac massage. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 95:523–532PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ornato JP, Levine RL, Young DS, Racht EM, Garnett AR, Gonzalez ER (1989) The effect of applied chest compression force on systemic arterial pressure and end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration during CPR in human beings. Ann Emerg Med 18:732–737PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Levine RL, Wayne MA, Miller CC (1997) End-tidal carbon dioxide and outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 337:301–306Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boe JM, Babbs CF (1999) Mechanics of cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed with the patient on a soft bed vs a hard surface. Acad Emerg Med 6:754–757PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Larsen PD, Perrin K, Galletly DC (2002) Patterns of external chest compression. Resuscitation 53:281–287CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hightower D, Thomas SH, Stone CK, Dunn K, March JA (1995) Decay in quality of closed-chest compressions over time. Ann Emerg Med 26:300–303PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wenzel V, Keller C, Idris AH, Dorges V, Lindner KH, Brimacombe JR (1999) Effects of smaller tidal volumes during basic life support ventilation in patients with respiratory arrest: good ventilation, less risk? Resuscitation 43:25–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dorges V, Ocker H, Wenzel V, Sauer C, Schmucker P (2001) Emergency airway management by non-anaesthesia house officers-a comparison of three strategies. Emerg Med J 18:90–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Clayton TJ, Pittman JA, Gabbott DA (2001) A comparison of two techniques for manual ventilation of the lungs by non-anaesthetists: the bag-valve-facemask and the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) apparatus. Anaesthesia 56:756–759CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Harrison RR, Maull KI, Keenan RL, Boyan CP (1982) Mouth-to-mask ventilation: a superior method of rescue breathing. Ann Emerg Med 11:74–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Skogvoll E, Wik L (1997) Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACD-CPR) compared with standard CPR in a manikin model-decompression force, compression rate, depth and duration. Resuscitation 34:11–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gavin D. Perkins
    • 1
  • Robert Benny
    • 2
  • Simon Giles
    • 1
  • Fang Gao
    • 1
  • Michael J. Tweed
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Intensive Care MedicineBirmingham Heartlands HospitalBirminghamUK
  2. 2.Leicester Warwick Medical SchoolUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations