Family participation in care to the critically ill: opinions of families and staff
- 953 Downloads
Allowing family members to participate in the care of patients in intensive care units (ICUs) may improve the quality of their experience. No previous study has investigated opinions about family participation in ICUs.
Prospective multicenter survey in 78 ICUs (1,184 beds) in France involving 2,754 ICU caregivers and 544 family members of 357 consecutive patients. We determined opinions and experience about family participation in care; comprehension (of diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment) and satisfaction (Critical Care Family Needs Inventory) scores to assess the effectiveness of information to families and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression score for family members.
Among caregivers 88.2% felt that participation in care should be offered to families. Only 33.4% of family members wanted to participate in care. Independent predictors of this desire fell into three groups: patient-related (SAPS II at ICU admission, OR 0.984); ICU stay length, OR 1.021), family-related (family member age, OR 0.97/year); family not of European descent, OR 0.294); previous ICU experience in the family, OR 1.59), and those related to emotional burden and effectiveness of information provided to family members (symptoms of depression in family members, OR 1.58); more time wanted for information, OR 1.06).
Most ICU caregivers are willing to invite family members to participate in patient care, but most family members would decline.
KeywordsIntensive care France Information Comprehension Satisfaction Anxiety
This study was carried out in the 78 ICUs listed in the Appendix. The coordinating study center was the Intensive Care Unit and Biostatistics Department of the Saint-Louis Teaching Hospital and University Paris 7, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France. These findings were presented at the congress of the French Society of Critical Care Medicine, January 2003.
- 2.Pochard F, Azoulay E, Chevret S, Lemaire F, Hubert P, Canoui P, Grassin M, Zittoun R, le Gall JR, Dhainaut JF, Schlemmer B (2001) Symptoms of anxiety and depression in family members of intensive care unit patients: ethical hypothesis regarding decision-making capacity. Crit Care Med 29:1893–1897PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Burchardi H (2001) A surrogate for decision-making in the ICU. Intensive Care Med 27:1243–1244Google Scholar
- 11.Coppolino M, Ackerson L (2001) Do surrogate decision makers provide accurate consent for intensive care research? Chest 119:603–612Google Scholar
- 23.Marsden C (1992) Family-centered critical care: an option or obligation? Am J Crit Care 1:115–117Google Scholar
- 25.Fried TR, Bradley EH, Towle VR, Allore H (2002) Understanding the treatment preferences of seriously ill patients. N Engl J Med 346:1061–1066Google Scholar
- 28.Henneman EA, McKenzie JB, Dewa CS (1992) An evaluation of interventions for meeting the information needs of families of critically ill patients. Am J Crit Care 1:85–93Google Scholar
- 31.Truog RD, Cist AF, Brackett SE, Burns JP, Curley MA, Danis M, DeVita MA, Rosenbaum SH, Rothenberg DM, Sprung CL, Webb SA, Wlody GS, Hurford WE (2001) Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: the Ethics Committee of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med 29:2332–2348PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Vincent JL (1998) Information in the ICU: are we being honest with our patients? The results of a European questionnaire. Intensive Care Med 24:1251–1256Google Scholar