Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 29, Issue 7, pp 1145–1150

In vitro evaluation of aerosol bronchodilator delivery during mechanical ventilation: pressure-control vs. volume control ventilation

  • Dean R. Hess
  • Christine Dillman
  • Robert M. Kacmarek
Experimental

Abstract

Objective

To determine the effect of inspiratory time and inspiratory flow pattern on albuterol delivery by aerosol during mechanical ventilation.

Design

A ventilator was connected to a lung model and set to deliver a tidal volume of 0.6 l, PEEP 5 cmH2O, and respiratory rate of 15/min. We evaluated inspiratory times of 1 and 2 s, lung mechanics of 0.05 l/cmH2O compliance and 50 cmH2O/l/s resistance, or 0.02 l/cmH2O compliance and 5 cmH2O/l/s resistance, and three inspiratory flow patterns (constant flow volume-controlled ventilation, descending ramp flow volume-controlled ventilation, and pressure-controlled ventilation). Albuterol was delivered into the ventilator circuit by a nebulizer containing 5 mg (4 ml) albuterol or a pMDI and spacer (four actuations; 360 µg). A filter between the Y-piece and the lung model collected the aerosol, which was analyzed for albuterol by spectrophotometry.

Results

For the nebulizer there were significant differences in albuterol delivered for inspiratory time, flow pattern, and lung mechanics. For the pMDI there were no significant differences for the amount of albuterol delivered for inspiratory time, flow pattern, or lung mechanics.

Conclusions

Albuterol delivery by nebulizer is affected by inspiratory time and inspiratory flow pattern. When a pMDI is used, the amount of albuterol delivered is not affected by inspiratory flow pattern or inspiratory time.

Keywords

Mechanical ventilation Aerosol therapy Nebulizer Pressurized metered-dose inhaler 

References

  1. 1.
    Hess D (2000) Nebulizers: principles and performance. Respir Care 45:609–622PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dhand R, Tobin MJ (1997) Inhaled bronchodilator therapy in mechanically ventilated patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 156:3–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fink JB, Dhand R (1999) Bronchodilator therapy in mechanically ventilated patients. Respir Care 44:53–69Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dhand R, Tobin MJ (1996) Bronchodilator delivery with metered-dose inhalers in mechanically ventilated patients. Eur Respir J 9:585–595PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duarte AG, Fink JB, Dhand R (2001) Inhalation therapy during mechanical ventilation. Respir Care Clin N Am 7:233–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marik P, Hogan J, Krikorian J (1999) A comparison of bronchodilator therapy delivered by nebulization and metered-dose inhaler in mechanically ventilated patients. Chest 115:1653–1657PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mouloudi E, Prinianakis G, Kondili E, Georgopoulos D (2000) Bronchodilator delivery by metered dose inhaler in mechanically ventilated patients: influence of flow pattern. Eur Respir J 16:263–268PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    MacIntyre NR (2002) Aerosol delivery through an artificial airway. Respir Care 47:1279–1285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hess D, Fisher D, Williams P, Pooler S, Kacmarek RM (1996) Medication nebulizer performance. Effects of diluent volume, nebulizer flow, and nebulizer brand. Chest 110:498–505PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hughes JM, Saez J (1987) Effects of nebulizer mode and position in a mechanical ventilator circuit on dose efficiency. Respir Care 32:1131–1135Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    O'Doherty MJ, Thomas SH, Page CJ, Treacher DF, Nunan TO (1992) Delivery of a nebulized aerosol to a lung model during mechanical ventilation. Effect of ventilator settings and nebulizer type, position, and volume of fill. Am Rev Respir Dis 146:383–388PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harvey CJ, O'Doherty MJ, Page CJ, Thomas SH, Nunan TO, Treacher DF (1995) Effect of a spacer on pulmonary aerosol deposition from a jet nebulizer during mechanical ventilation. Thorax 50:50–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hess D, Fisher D, Williams P, Pooler S, Kacmarek RM (1996) Medication nebulizer performance. Effects of diluent volume, nebulizer flow, and nebulizer brand. Chest 110:498–505PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O'Riordan TG, Greco MJ, Perry RJ, Smaldone GC (1992) Nebulizer function during mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 145:1117–1122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McPeck M, O'Riordan TG, Smaldone GC (1993) Choice of mechanical ventilator: influence on nebulizer performance. Respir Care 38:887–895Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Good M, Fink JB, Dhand R, Tobin MJ (2001) Improvement in aerosol delivery with helium-oxygene mixtures during mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163:109–114PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hess DR, Medoff MD, Fessler MB (1999) Pulmonary mechanics and graphics during positive pressure ventilation. Int Anesthesiol Clin 37:15–34Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mouloudi E, Prinianakis G, Kondili E, Georgopoulos D (2001) Effect of inspiratory flow rate on beta2-agonist induced bronchodilation in mechanically ventilated COPD patients. Intensive Care Med 27:42–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mouloudi E, Katsanoulas K, Anastasaki M, Hoing S, Georgopoulos D (1999) Bronchodilator delivery by metered-dose inhaler in mechanically ventilated COPD patients: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 25:1215–1221PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mouloudi E, Katsanoulas K, Anastasaki M, Askitopoulou E, Georgopoulos D (1998) Bronchodilator delivery by metered-dose inhaler in mechanically ventilated COPD patients: influence of end-inspiratory pause. Eur Respir J 12:165–169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fuller HD, Dolovich MB, Turpie FH, Newhouse MT (1994) Efficiency of bronchodilator aerosol delivery to the lungs from the metered dose inhaler in mechanically ventilated patients: a study comparing four different actuator devices. Chest 105:214–218PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Diot P, Morra L, Smaldone GC (1995) Albuterol delivery in a model of mechanical ventilation: comparison of metered-dose inhaler and nebulizer efficiency. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 152:1391–1394PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fink JB, Dhand R, Duarte AG, Jenne JW, Tobin MJ (1996) Deposition of aerosol from metered-dose inhaler during mechanical ventilation: an in vitro model. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 154:382–387PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fink, JB, Dhand R, Grychowski J, Fahey PJ, Tobin MJ (1999) Reconciling in vitro and in vivo measurements of aerosol delivery from a metered-dose inhaler during mechanical ventilation and defining efficiency-enhancing factors. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159:63–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Craven DE, Lichtenberg DA, Goularte TA, Make BJ, McCabe WR (1984) Contaminated medication nebulizers in mechanical ventilator circuits: a source of bacterial aerosols. Am J Med 77:834–838PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Beatty CD, Ritz RH, Benson MS (1989) Continuous in-line nebulizers complicate pressure support ventilation. Chest 96:1360–1363PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hess D (2002) Aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation. Minerva Anestesiol 68:321–325PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fink JB, Dhand R (2001) Laboratory evaluation of metered-dose inhalers with models that simulate interaction with the patient. Respir Care Clin N Am 7:303–317PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dean R. Hess
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christine Dillman
    • 1
  • Robert M. Kacmarek
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Massachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA
  2. 2.Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations