In vitro evaluation of aerosol bronchodilator delivery during mechanical ventilation: pressure-control vs. volume control ventilation
- First Online:
- 252 Downloads
To determine the effect of inspiratory time and inspiratory flow pattern on albuterol delivery by aerosol during mechanical ventilation.
A ventilator was connected to a lung model and set to deliver a tidal volume of 0.6 l, PEEP 5 cmH2O, and respiratory rate of 15/min. We evaluated inspiratory times of 1 and 2 s, lung mechanics of 0.05 l/cmH2O compliance and 50 cmH2O/l/s resistance, or 0.02 l/cmH2O compliance and 5 cmH2O/l/s resistance, and three inspiratory flow patterns (constant flow volume-controlled ventilation, descending ramp flow volume-controlled ventilation, and pressure-controlled ventilation). Albuterol was delivered into the ventilator circuit by a nebulizer containing 5 mg (4 ml) albuterol or a pMDI and spacer (four actuations; 360 µg). A filter between the Y-piece and the lung model collected the aerosol, which was analyzed for albuterol by spectrophotometry.
For the nebulizer there were significant differences in albuterol delivered for inspiratory time, flow pattern, and lung mechanics. For the pMDI there were no significant differences for the amount of albuterol delivered for inspiratory time, flow pattern, or lung mechanics.
Albuterol delivery by nebulizer is affected by inspiratory time and inspiratory flow pattern. When a pMDI is used, the amount of albuterol delivered is not affected by inspiratory flow pattern or inspiratory time.
KeywordsMechanical ventilation Aerosol therapy Nebulizer Pressurized metered-dose inhaler
- 3.Fink JB, Dhand R (1999) Bronchodilator therapy in mechanically ventilated patients. Respir Care 44:53–69Google Scholar
- 10.Hughes JM, Saez J (1987) Effects of nebulizer mode and position in a mechanical ventilator circuit on dose efficiency. Respir Care 32:1131–1135Google Scholar
- 15.McPeck M, O'Riordan TG, Smaldone GC (1993) Choice of mechanical ventilator: influence on nebulizer performance. Respir Care 38:887–895Google Scholar
- 17.Hess DR, Medoff MD, Fessler MB (1999) Pulmonary mechanics and graphics during positive pressure ventilation. Int Anesthesiol Clin 37:15–34Google Scholar