Comparison of the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Reaction Level Scale for assessment of cerebral responsiveness in the critically ill
- 509 Downloads
The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is a well-known source of error in outcome prediction models. We compared assessment of cerebral responsiveness with the GCS and the Reaction Level Scale (RLS) in two otherwise similar outcome prediction models.
Design and setting
Prospective, observational study in a general intensive care unit.
Patients and participants
All admissions of patients with or at risk of developing impaired brain function between 1997 and 1998 (n=534).
Measurements and results
Admissions were scored by RLS and APACHE II (includes scoring with the GCS). The RLS scores were transformed to APACHE II central nervous system scores according to a predetermined protocol. APACHE II estimated probability of death was calculated conventionally with the GCS and the RLS. Vital status 90 days after admission was secured from a national database. Bias and precision was 0.5% and 16.6%, respectively. The area under receiver operating characteristic curves was slightly but significantly greater with the RLS-based APACHE II model than with the GCS-based model (0.92 vs. 0.90). Discrimination was improved primarily in admissions with low and intermediate probability of death.
Scoring of cerebral responsiveness with the RLS instead of the GCS was associated with minimal bias of the APACHE II probability of death estimate. Assessment of consciousness in critically ill with the RLS deserves further evaluation
KeywordsIntensive care Severity of illness index Outcome prediction Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Glasgow Coma Scale Reaction Level Scale
This work was performed at the Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Norrköping Hospital, Norrköping, Sweden. The research was supported by a grant from the Norrköping Hospital Research Board.
- 3.Teasdale G, Jennett B (1974) Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet II:81–84Google Scholar
- 8.Starmark JE, Stalhammar D, Holmgren E (1988) The Reaction Level Scale (RLS85). Manual and guidelines. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 91:12–20Google Scholar
- 10.Tesseris J, Pantazidis N, Routsi C, Fragoulakis D (1991) A comparative study of the Reaction Level Scale (RLS85) with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Edinburgh-2 Coma Scale (modified) (E2CS (M)). Acta Neurochir (Wien) 110:65–76Google Scholar
- 11.Stalhammar D, Starmark JE, Holmgren E, Eriksson N, Nordstrom CH, Fedders O, Rosander B (1988) Assessment of responsiveness in acute cerebral disorders. A multicentre study on the reaction level scale (RLS 85). Acta Neurochir (Wien) 90:73–80Google Scholar
- 13.Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet I:307–310Google Scholar
- 19.Bastos PG, Sun X, Wagner DP, Wu AW, Knaus WA (1993) Glasgow Coma Scale sum score in the evaluation of outcome in the intensive care unit: findings from the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III study. Crit Care Med 21:1459–1465Google Scholar
- 24.Marshall LF, Marshall SB, Klauber MR, Van Berkum Clark M, Eisenberg H, Jane JA, Luerssen TG, Marmarou A, Foulkes MA (1992) The diagnosis of head injury requires a classification based on computed axial tomography. J Neurotrauma 9 [Suppl 1]:S287–S292Google Scholar