Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 476–480 | Cite as

Influence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients

  • Daniel A. Reuter
  • Julian Bayerlein
  • Matthias S. G. Goepfert
  • Florian C. Weis
  • Erich Kilger
  • Peter Lamm
  • Alwin E. GoetzEmail author
Brief Report



Real-time measurement of stroke volume variation by arterial pulse contour analysis (SVV) is useful in predicting volume responsiveness and monitoring volume therapy in mechanically ventilated patients. This study investigated the influence of the depth of tidal volume (Vt) on SVV both during the state of fluid responsiveness and after fluid loading in mechanically ventilated patients.

Design and setting

Prospective study in a university hospital, adult cardiac surgery intensive care unit.

Patients and participants

20 hemodynamically stable patients immediately after cardiac surgery.


Stepwise fluid loading using colloids until stroke volume index (SVI) did not increase by more than 10%. Before and after fluid loading Vt was varied (5, 10, and 15 ml/kg body weight) in random order.

Measurements and results

Pulse contour SVV was measured before and after volume loading at the respective Vt values. Thirteen patients responded to fluid loading with an increase in SVI greater than 10%, which confirmed volume responsiveness at baseline measurements. These were included in further analysis. During volume responsiveness SVV at Vt of 5 ml/kg (7±0.7%) and SVV at Vt of 15 ml/kg (21±2.5%) differed significantly from that at Vt of 10 ml/kg (15±2.1%). SVV was correlated significantly with the magnitude of Vt. After volume resuscitation SVV at the respective Vt was significantly reduced; further, SVV at Vt of 5 ml/kg-1 (5.3±0.6%) and 15 ml/kg (16.2±2.0%) differed significantly from that at Vt of 10 ml/kg (10.2±1.0%). SVV and depth of Vt were significantly related.


In addition to intravascular volume status SVV is affected by the depth of tidal volume under mechanical ventilation. This influence must be regarded when using SVV for functional preload monitoring.


Diagnostic techniques Cardiovascular Preload Fluid responsiveness Cardiac output Pulse contour analysis Mechanical ventilation 


  1. 1.
    Michard F, Teboul JL (2002) Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 121:2000–2008PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pinsky MR (2002) Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Intensive Care Med 28:386–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jardin F, Farcot JC, Gueret P, Prost JF, Ozier Y, Bourdarias JP (1983) Cyclic changes in arterial pulse during respiratory support. Circulation 83:266–274Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Perel A, Pizov R, Cotev S (1987) Systolic blood pressure variation is a sensitive indicator of hypovolemia in ventilated dogs subjected to graded hemorrhage. Anesthesiology 67:498–502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G, Dupont J, Scherpereel P (1998) Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 89:1313–1321PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, Anguel N, Mercat A, Lecarpentier Y, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL (2000) Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162:134–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frank O (1930) Schätzung des Schlagvolumens des menschlichen Herzens aufgrund der Wellen- und Windkesseltheorie. Z Biol 90:405Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Felbinger TW, Reuter DA, Eltzschig HK, Goedje O, Goetz AE (2002) Comparison of pulmonary arterial thermodilution and arterial pulse contour analysis: evaluation of a new algorithm. J Clin Anesth 2002 14:296–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Schmidt C, Kilger E, Lamm P, Goetz AE (2002) Optimising fluid therapy in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery by on-line monitoring of left ventricular stroke volume variations—a comparison to aortic systolic pressure variations. B J Anaesth 88:124–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berkenstadt C, Margalit N, Hadani M, Friedman Z, Segal E, Villa Y, Perel A (2001) Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 92:984–989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Schmidt C, Kilger E, Goedje O, Lamm P, Goetz AE (2002) Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 28:392–398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Versprille A, Jansen JR, Frietman RC, Hulsmann AR, van den Klauw MM (1990) Negative effect of insufflation on cardiac output and pulmonary blood volume. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 34:607–615PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Szold A, Pizov R, Segal E, Perel A (1989) The effect of tidal volume and intravascular volume state on systolic pressure variation in ventilated dogs. Intensive Care Med 15:368–371PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sonnenblick EH, Strobeck JE (1977) Current concepts in cardiology: derived indexes of ventricular and myocardial function. N Engl J Med 296:978–982PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Van den Berg PCM, Jansen JRC, Pinsky MR (2002) Effect of positive pressure ventilation on venous return in volume loaded cardiac surgical patients. J Appl Physiol 92:1223–1231PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel A. Reuter
    • 1
  • Julian Bayerlein
    • 1
  • Matthias S. G. Goepfert
    • 1
  • Florian C. Weis
    • 1
  • Erich Kilger
    • 1
  • Peter Lamm
    • 2
  • Alwin E. Goetz
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of AnesthesiologyUniversity of MunichMunichGermany
  2. 2.Department of Cardiac SurgeryUniversity of MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations