Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 28, Issue 8, pp 1049–1057 | Cite as

Bench testing of pressure support ventilation with three different generations of ventilators

  • J.-C. Richard
  • A. Carlucci
  • L. Breton
  • N. Langlais
  • S. Jaber
  • S. Maggiore
  • S. Fougère
  • A. Harf
  • L. Brochard
Original

Abstract

Objective. The new generations of intensive care ventilators tend to be more innovative and sophisticated than previous ones, but little is known about their respective performance for delivering pressure support ventilation (PSV) and how they compare to previous generations.

Design. Active lung model bench test.

Apparatus. Twenty-two commercially available ventilators classified into three categories: new generation ventilators (after 1993, n=7), previous generation (before 1993, n=6), and recent piston or turbine-based ventilators (n=9).

Measurements and results. During PSV, the unloading efficacy of the assistance depends on the ventilator's ability to meet inspiratory flow demand. Three levels of flow (0.1 l/s, 0.6 l/s, and 1.2 l/s) were used to simulate inspiratory demand and the net area of the inspiratory airway pressure-time trace was calculated over the first 0.3 s, 0.5 s, and 1 s (Area0.3, Area0.5, and Areatot) with three levels of PSV (5 cmH2O, 10 cmH2O, and 15 cmH2O). To assess the respective role of pressure support delivery and triggering function, triggering sensitivity was assessed independently by measuring the time delay (TDtg) and the pressure fall (ΔPawtg) with two levels of inspiratory drive. All the new generation ventilators exhibited significantly better results than most of the previous generation ventilators regarding Area0.3 and TDtg, indicating large improvements in terms of triggering and pressurisation.

Conclusion. Regarding PSV and trigger performance, the new generation ventilators – but also some piston and turbine-based ventilators – outperform most of previous generation ventilators.

Demand-valve Pressure support ventilation Work of breathing Trigger 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • J.-C. Richard
    • 1
  • A. Carlucci
    • 1
  • L. Breton
    • 1
  • N. Langlais
    • 1
  • S. Jaber
    • 1
  • S. Maggiore
    • 1
  • S. Fougère
    • 1
  • A. Harf
    • 1
  • L. Brochard
    • 1
  1. 1.Assistance Publique – Hopital de Paris, and the Groupe de Travail des respiratuers de l'AP-HP, Paris, FranceFrance
  2. 2.Intensive Care Unit, Paris 12 Université and INSERM U 492, Henri Mondor Hospital, CréteilFrance
  3. 3.Department of Physiology, Paris 12 Université, and INSERM U 492, Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France France
  4. 4.DIREQ, Paris 12 Université and INSERM U 492, Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, FranceFrance

Personalised recommendations