Waste Brick as Constructed Wetland Fillers to Treat the Tail Water of Sewage Treatment Plant

  • Guozhen Zhang
  • Kai MaEmail author
  • Zixian Zhang
  • Xingbao Shang
  • Fuping Wu


Adopting the concept of "using waste to treat waste", the waste bricks will be used for constructed wetland filling. Integrated vertical-flow constructed wetland (IVCW) studied on the purification effect in influent water under three hydraulic loads (0.15, 0.25, 0.35 m/day). The results show that the waste bricks can be used as the carrier for the growth of the system biofilm, and have positive effects on the removal of pollutants in the influent water. Under three different hydraulic load conditions, the vertical flow of CWs can significantly reduce the load of water intake. In the low hydraulic load condition of 0.15 m/day, the average removal rates of chemical oxygen demand (COD), ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) can reach 66.52%, 72.10%, 56.53% and 91.55% in this system, respectively. The influent pool on removal efficiency of pollutants was obviously higher than that of the upper pool, especially in the inlet surface 0–30 cm ranges. This research has achieved the effect of using "waste" to treat wastewater, which has strong practical significance and popularization value.


Constructed wetlands Sewage treatment Hydraulic loads Waste bricks 



This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51768031) and the Key Research and Development Program in Gansu Province (Grant No. 17YF1NA056).


  1. Abou-Elela SI, Fawzy ME, El-Gendy AS (2015) Potential of using biological aerated filter as a post treatment for municipal wastewater. Ecol Eng 84:53–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed G, Latifa B, Fabio M, Martin R (2011) Constructed wetland as a low cost and sustainable solution for wastewater treatment adapted to rural settlements: the Chorfech wastewater treatment pilot plant. Water Sci Technol A 63:3006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. An W, Zhou X, Liu X, Chai PW, Kuznicki T, Kuznicki SM (2014) Natural zeolite clinoptilolite-phosphate composite Membranes for water desalination by pervaporation. J Membr Sci 470:431–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bao Z, Lu W, Chi B, Yuan H, Hao J (2019) Procurement innovation for a circular economy of construction and demolition waste: lessons learnt from Suzhou, China. Waste Manag 99:12–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braskerud CB, Lundekvam H, Krogstad T (2000) The impact of hydraulic load and aggregation on sedimentation of soil particles in small constructed wetlands. J Environ Qual 29:2013–2020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen ZM, Chen B, Zhou JB, Li Z, Zhou Y, Xi XR, Lin C, Chen GQ (2008) A vertical subsurface-flow constructed wetland in Beijing. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 13:1986–1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen J, Yao J, Bai YL (2009) Rural domestic wastewater treatment through anaerobism and artificial wetland. Agric Sci Technol (Engl). 10:158–161Google Scholar
  8. Cui B, Yang Q, Zhang Y, Liu X, Wu W, Li J (2019) Improving nitrogen removal in biological aeration filter for domestic sewage treatment via adjusting microbial community structure. Bioresour Technol 293:122006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dong QZ, Jinadasa KBSN, Gersberg RM, Yu L, Ng WJ, Tan SK (2014) Application of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in developing countries: a review of recent developments (2000–2013). J Environ Manag 141:116–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feng L, Yang G, Zhu L, Xu X, Gao F, Mu J, Xu Y (2015) Enhancement removal of endocrine-disrupting pesticides and nitrogen removal in a biofilm reactor coupling of biodegradable Phragmites communis and elastic filler for polluted source water treatment. Bioresour Technol 187:331–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ghosh D, Gopal B (2010) Effect of hydraulic retention time on the treatment of secondary effluent in a subsurface flow constructed wetland. Ecol Eng 36:1044–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamid KIA, Sanciolo P, Gray S, Duke M, Muthukumaran S (2019) Comparison of the effects of ozone, biological activated carbon (BAC) filtration and combined ozone-BAC pre-treatments on the microfiltration of secondary effluent. Sep Purif Technol 215:308–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ivanov I, Ren L, Siegert M, Logan BE (2013) A quantitative method to evaluate microbial electrolysis cell effectiveness for energy recovery and wastewater treatment. Int J Hydrogen Energy 38:13135–13142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ji ZH, Feng CL, Wu XF, Zhou SY, Huang HM (2016) Research progress on filler application and purification mechanisms in constructed wetland wastewater treatment system. Chin J Ecol 8:35Google Scholar
  15. Lantzke IR, Mitchell DS, Heritage AD, Sharma KP (1999) A model of factors controlling orthophosphate removal in planted vertical flow wetlands. Ecol Eng 12:93–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu R, Zhao Y, Doherty L, Hu Y, Hao X (2015) A review of incorporation of constructed wetland with other treatment processes. Chem Eng J 279:220–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lu S, Pei L, Bai X (2015) Study on method of domestic wastewater treatment through new-type multi-layer artificial wetland. Int J Hydrogen Energy 40:11207–11214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lu D, Chen Q, Liu P, Xia Z, Wang H, Zhou Q, Dong X, Wu Z (2017) Phosphorus removal performance and biological dephosphorization process in treating reclaimed water by Integrated Vertical-flow Constructed Wetlands (IVCWs). Bioresour Technol 243:204–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mohan SV, Mohanakrishna G, Ramanaiah SV, Sarma PN (2008) Simultaneous biohydrogen production and wastewater treatment in biofilm configured anaerobic periodic discontinuous batch reactor using distillery wastewater. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33:550–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Monitor PASE (2002) Monitor and analysis method of water and wastewater. Chinese Environmental Science Publication House, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  21. Rousseau DPL, Vanrolleghem PA, Pauw ND (2004) Model-based design of horizontal subsurface flow constructed treatment wetlands: a review. Water Res 38:1484–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sbardella L, Comas J, Fenu A, Rodriguez-Roda I, Weemaes M (2018) Advanced biological activated carbon filter for removing pharmaceutically active compounds from treated wastewater. Sci Total Environ 636:519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shen Z, Zhou Y, Jia L, Yu X, Rong C, Wu F (2015) Enhanced removal of nitrate using starch/PCL blends as solid carbon source in a constructed wetland. Bioresour Technol 175:239–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shi X, Fan J, Zhang J, Shen Y (2017) Enhanced phosphorus removal in intermittently aerated constructed wetlands filled with various construction wastes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Strzemiecka B, Voelkel A, Kasperkowiak M (2010) Characterization of zeolites as potential new generation fillers in abrasive articles. Physicochemical properties of zeolites and their interactions with resins. Colloids Surf A 372:80–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tang ZR, Wen Y, Zhou Q (2012) Research on the phosphorus removal mechanisms and approaches in various horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Adv Mater Res 573–574:599–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Verlicchi P, Zambello E (2014) How efficient are constructed wetlands in removing pharmaceuticals from untreated and treated urban wastewaters? A review. Sci Total Environ 470–471:1281–1306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang Q, Xie H, Ngo HH, Guo W, Zhang J, Liu C, Liang S, Hu Z, Yang Z, Zhao C (2016) Microbial abundance and community in subsurface flow constructed wetland microcosms: role of plant presence. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:4036–4045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang H-C, Cui D, Han J-L, Cheng H-Y, Liu W-Z, Peng Y-Z, Chen Z-B, Wang A-J (2019) A2O-MBR as an efficient and profitable unconventional water treatment and reuse technology: a practical study in a green building residential community. Resourc Conserv Recycl 150:104418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Weerakoon GMPR, Jinadasa KBSN, Herath GBB, Mowjood MIM, Bruggen JJAV (2013) Impact of the hydraulic loading rate on pollutants removal in tropical horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng 61:154–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wu JQ, Wang M, Wu J, Tang H (2012) Treatment of polluted river water using surface flow constructed wetlands in Xinyi River Floodplain. Adv Mater Res 396–398:1909–1913Google Scholar
  32. Wu S, Kuschk P, Brix H, Vymazal J, Dong R (2014) Development of constructed wetlands inperformance intensifications for wastewater treatment: a nitrogen and organic matter targeted review. Water Res 57C:40–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wu H, Jian Z, Ngo HH, Guo W, Zhen H, Shuang L, Fan J, Hai L (2015) A review on the sustainability of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: design and operation. Bioresour Technol 175:594–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Xu Q, Hunag Z, Wang X, Cui L (2015) Pennisetum sinese Roxb and Pennisetum purpureum Schum. as vertical-flow constructed wetland vegetation for removal of N and P from domestic sewage. Ecol Eng 83:120–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yang Y, Wang ZM, Liu C, Guo XC (2012) Enhanced p, n and c removal from domestic wastewater using constructed wetland employing construction solid waste (csw) as main substrate. Water Sci Technol 66(5):1022–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ying-Feng L, Shuh-Ren J, Tze-Wen W, Der-Yuan L (2001) Effects of macrophytes and external carbon sources on nitrate removal from groundwater in constructed wetlands. Environ Pollut 119:413–420Google Scholar
  37. Zaytsev I, Mander Ü, Lõhmus K, Nurk K (2011) Enhanced denitrification in a bioaugmented horizontal subsurface flow filter. Ecol Eng 37:1050–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang L, Zhang L, Liu Y, Shen Y, Liu H, Xiong Y (2010) Effect of limited artificial aeration on constructed wetland treatment of domestic wastewater. Desalination 250:915–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang L, Sun Z, Jia X, Wu J, Cheng S (2018) Nutrient removal, biomass accumulation and nitrogen-transformation functional gene response to different nitrogen forms in enhanced floating treatment wetlands. Ecol Eng 112:21–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhao XH, Zhao YQ, Kearney P (2011) Transformation of beneficially reused aluminium sludge to potential P and Al resource after employing as P-trapping material for wastewater treatment in constructed wetland. Chem Eng J 174:206–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhao M, Wang S, Wang H, Qin P, Yang D, Sun Y, Kong F (2019) Application of sodium titanate nanofibers as constructed wetland fillers for efficient removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater. Environ Pollut 248:938–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zheng Y, Wang XC, Dzakpasu M, Yuan G, Zhao Y, Xiong J (2016) Performance of a pilot demonstration-scale hybrid constructed wetland system for on-site treatment of polluted urban river water in Northwestern China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:447–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhou X, Wang X, Zhang H, Wu H (2017) Enhanced nitrogen removal of low C/N domestic wastewater using a biochar-amended aerated vertical flow constructed wetland. Bioresour Technol 241:269–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guozhen Zhang
    • 1
  • Kai Ma
    • 1
    Email author
  • Zixian Zhang
    • 1
  • Xingbao Shang
    • 1
  • Fuping Wu
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Environmental and Municipal EngineeringLanzhou Jiaotong UniversityLanzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations