Ecotoxicity of Mine Tailings: Unrehabilitated Versus Rehabilitated
- 30 Downloads
Earthworms are bioindicators of soil pollution. The ecotoxicity of tailings from selected gold mines in South Africa was investigated utilizing Eisenia andrei bioassays and biomarkers. Samples were obtained from unrehabilitated, rehabilitated and naturally vegetated sites. Biomass, neutral red retention time (NRRT), survival and reproduction were assessed using standardized protocols. Earthworm biomass, NRRT and reproductive success in rehabilitated tailings (comparable to naturally vegetated site) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than in unrehabilitated tailings. In addition, significantly lower (p < 0.05) body tissue concentrations of As, Cd, Co, Cu and Ni contents were found in the rehabilitated tailings compared to the unrehabilitated. Further, significantly lower (p < 0.05) soil Mn and Zn concentrations were obtained in unrehabilitated tailings than the rehabilitated and naturally vegetated sites. Overall, reduced ecotoxicity effects were confirmed in rehabilitated compared to unrehabilitated tailings. This suggests that rehabilitation as a post-mining restorative strategy has strong positive influence on mine tailings.
KeywordsBiomarkers Eisenia andrei Gold mine tailings Soil pollution Rehabilitated and unrehabilitated sites Post-mining restoration strategy
The financial assistance of the National Research Foundation (NRF) towards this research is hereby acknowledged. Opinions expressed and conclusions arrived at, are those of the authors and are not necessarily to be attributed to the NRF.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
We hereby declare that the research has no possible conflicts of interest and that animals (earthworms) used in this study was handled according to ethical compliant standards.
- Chamber of Mines (2017) Modernisation: towards the mine of tomorrow fact sheet 2017Google Scholar
- DEAT (Department of Environmental Affairs) (2014) South African National Environmental Management, Waste act, 331 (act no. 59 of 2008). National norms and standards for the remediation of contaminated land and soil qualityGoogle Scholar
- Demuynck S, Grumiaux F, Mottier V, Schikorski D, Lemière S, Lelprêtre A (2007) Cd/Zn exposure interactions on metallothionein response in Eisenia andrei (Annelida, Oligochaeta). Comp Biochem Physiol 145:658–668Google Scholar
- Gastaldi L, Ranzato E, Capri F, Hankard P, Pérès G, Canesi L, Viarengo A, Pons G (2007) Application of a biomarker battery for the evaluation of the sublethal effects of pollutants in the earthworm Eisenia andrei. Comp Biochem Physiol C 146:398–405Google Scholar
- ISO (International Organization for Standardization) (2012) Soil quality—effects of pollutants on earthworms—part 1: determination of acute toxicity to Eisenia andrei/Eisenia andrei. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- MBendi Information Services (Pty) Ltd (2016) Mining in South Africa-overview. MBendi Information Services, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
- OECD (2016) OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals draft updated TG 222. Earthworm reproduction test (Eisenia andrei/Eisenia andrei)Google Scholar
- USEPA (US. Environmental Protection Agency) (1996) Acid Digestion of sludges, solids and soils. Method 3050B. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/documents/epa-3050b.pdf. Accessed 19 July 2017
- Wilke BM (2010) Determination of chemical and physical soil properties. In: Margesin R, Schinner F (eds), Manual of soil analysis: monitoring and assessing soil bioremediation, pp 47–95Google Scholar
- Zaragoza VMD, Castorena EVG, Castorena MCG, González RC, Solorio CAO, Santos AT (2015) Heavy metals contamination in soils around tailing heaps with various degrees of weathering in Zimapán, Mexico. Int J Environ Sci 72(1):24–40Google Scholar
- Zhiyuan L, Zongwei M, Tsering JK, Zengwei Y, Lei H (2014) A review of soil heavy metal pollution from mines in China: pollution and health risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 468–469:843–853Google Scholar