Advertisement

Detection and Sizing of Ti-Containing Particles in Recreational Waters Using Single Particle ICP-MS

  • Arjun K. Venkatesan
  • Robert B. Reed
  • Sungyun Lee
  • Xiangyu Bi
  • David Hanigan
  • Yu Yang
  • James F. Ranville
  • Pierre Herckes
  • Paul Westerhoff
Article

Abstract

Single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (spICP-MS) was used to detect Ti-containing particles in heavily-used bathing areas of a river (Salt River) and five swimming pools. Ti-containing particle concentrations in swimming pools ranged from 2.8 × 103 to 4.4 × 103 particles/mL and were an order of magnitude lower than those detected in the Salt River. Measurements from the Salt River showed an 80% increase in Ti-containing particle concentration over baseline concentration during peak recreational activity (at 16:00 h) in the river. Cloud point extraction followed by transmission electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray analysis confirmed presence of aggregated TiO2 particles in river samples, showing morphological similarity to particles present in an over-the-counter sunscreen product. The maximum particle mass concentration detected in a sample from the Salt River (659 ng/L) is only slightly lower than the predicted no effect concentration for TiO2 to aquatic organisms (< 1 μg/L).

Keywords

Titanium dioxide Nanoparticles Single particle inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (SP-ICP-MS) Recreational waters Exposure River 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was partially funded by the National Science Foundation (CBET 0847710) and the US Environmental Protection Agency through the STAR program (RD83558001). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF and USEPA. We gratefully acknowledge the use of facilities with the LeRoy Eyring Center for Solid State Science at Arizona State University. We would like to thank Dr. Heather Tugaoen for her help with sampling and Dr. Jared Schoepf for his help with TEM.

References

  1. Baveye P, Laba M (2008) Aggregation and toxicology of titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Environ Health Perspect 116:A152–A152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boncagni NT, Otaegui JM, Warner E, Curran T, Ren JH, De Cortalezzi MMF (2009) Exchange of TiO2 nanoparticles between streams and streambeds. Environ Sci Technol 43:7699–7705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chiu C, Westerhoff P (2010) Trace organics in Arizona surface and wastewaters. Contaminants of emerging concern in the environment: ecological and human health considerations. ACS Publications, Washington, pp 81–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chowdhury S, Alhooshani K, Karanfil T (2014) Disinfection byproducts in swimming pool: occurrences, implications and future needs. Water Res 53:68–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deng Y, Petersen EJ, Challis KE, Rabb SA, Holbrook RD, Ranville JF, Nelson BC, Xing B (2017) Multiple method analysis of TiO2 nanoparticle uptake in rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants. Environ Sci Technol 51(18):10615–10623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Domingos RF, Tufenkji N, Wilkinson KJ (2009) Aggregation of titanium dioxide nanoparticles: role of a fulvic acid. Environ Sci Technol 43:1282–1286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Donovan AR, Adams CD, Ma YF, Stephan C, Eichholz T, Shi HL (2016) Single particle ICP-MS characterization of titanium dioxide, silver, and gold nanoparticles during drinking water treatment. Chemosphere 144:148–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gondikas AP, von der Kammer F, Reed RB, Wagner S, Ranville JF, Hofmann T (2014) Release of TiO2 nanoparticles from sunscreens into surface waters: a one-year survey at the Old Danube Recreational Lake. Environ Sci Technol 48:5415–5422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gottschalk F, Sonderer T, Scholz RW, Nowack B (2009) Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO2, ZnO, Ag, CNT, fullerenes) for different regions. Environ Sci Technol 43:9216–9222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holbrook RD, Motabar D, Quifiones O, Stanford B, Vanderford B, Moss D (2013) Titanium distribution in swimming pool water is dominated by dissolved species. Environ Pollut 181:68–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hund-Rinke K, Simon M (2006) Ecotoxic effect of photocatalytic active nanoparticles TiO2 on algae and daphnids. Environ Sci Pollut Res 13:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Iavicoli I, Leso V, Bergamaschi A (2012) Toxicological effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles: a review of in vivo studies. J Nanomater.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/964381 Google Scholar
  13. Jovanovic B, Guzman HM (2014) Effects of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles on caribbean reef- building coral (Montastraea Faveolata). Environ Toxicol Chem 33:1346–1353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim HA, Lee BT, Na SY, Kim KW, Ranville JF, Kim SO, Jo E, Eom IC (2017) Characterization of silver nanoparticle aggregates using single particle-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (spICP-MS). Chemosphere 171:468–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Laborda F, Bolea E, Cepria G, Gomez MT, Jimenez MS, Perez-Arantegui J, Castillo JR (2016) Detection, characterization and quantification of inorganic engineered nanomaterials: a review of techniques and methodological approaches for the analysis of complex samples. Anal Chim Acta 904:10–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee S, Bi XY, Reed RB, Ranville JF, Herckes P, Westerhoff P (2014) Nanoparticle size detection limits by single particle ICP-MS for 40 elements. Environ Sci Technol 48:10291–10300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mitrano DM, Barber A, Bednar A, Westerhoff P, Higgins CP, Ranville JF (2012) Silver nanoparticle characterization using single particle ICP-MS (SP-ICP-MS) and asymmetrical flow field flow fractionation ICP-MS (AF4-ICP-MS). J Anal At Spectrom 27:1131–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mueller NC, Nowack B (2008) Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 42:4447–4453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pace HE, Rogers NJ, Jarolimek C, Coleman VA, Higgins CP, Ranville JF (2012) Determining transport efficiency for the purpose of counting and sizing nanoparticles via single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 83:4633–4633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Praetorius A, Labille J, Scheringer M, Thill A, Hungerbuhler K, Bottero JY (2014) Heteroaggregation of titanium dioxide nanoparticles with model natural colloids under environmentally relevant conditions. Environ Sci Technol 48:10690–10698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reed RB, Martin DP, Bednar AJ, Montaño MD, Westerhoff P, Ranville JF (2017) Multi-day diurnal measurements of Ti-containing nanoparticle and organic sunscreen chemical release during recreational use of a natural surface water. Environ Sci Nano 4(1):69–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Robichaud CO, Uyar AE, Darby MR, Zucker LG, Wiesner MR (2009) Estimates of upper bounds and trends in nano-TiO2 production as a basis for exposure assessment. Environ Sci Technol 43:4227–4233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shi HB, Magaye R, Castranova V, Zhao JS (2013) Titanium dioxide nanoparticles: a review of current toxicological data. Part Fibre Toxicol 10(1), 15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Telgmann L, Nguyen MTK, Shen L, Yargeau V, Hintelmann H, Metcalfe CD (2016) Single particle ICP-MS as a tool for determining the stability of silver nanoparticles in aquatic matrixes under various environmental conditions, including treatment by ozonation. Anal Bioanal Chem 408(19):5169–5177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vidmar J, Milacic R, Scancar J (2017) Sizing and simultaneous quantification of nanoscale titanium dioxide and a dissolved titanium form by single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Microchem J 132:391–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Weir A, Westerhoff P, Fabricius L, Hristovski K, von Goetz N (2012) Titanium dioxide nanoparticles in food and personal care. Prod Environ Sci Technol 46:2242–2250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yang Y, Westerhoff P (2014) Presence in, and release of, nanomaterials from consumer products. Adv Exp Med Biol 811:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yang Y, Reed R, Schoepf J, Hristovski K, Herckes P, Westerhoff P (2017) Prospecting nanomaterials in aqueous environments by cloud-point extraction coupled with transmission electron microscopy. Sci Total Environ 584:515–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arjun K. Venkatesan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Robert B. Reed
    • 1
    • 3
  • Sungyun Lee
    • 1
    • 4
  • Xiangyu Bi
    • 1
  • David Hanigan
    • 1
    • 5
  • Yu Yang
    • 1
  • James F. Ranville
    • 3
  • Pierre Herckes
    • 6
  • Paul Westerhoff
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built EnvironmentArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Center for Clean Water Technology, Department of Civil EngineeringStony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA
  3. 3.Department of Chemistry and GeochemistryColorado School of MinesGoldenUSA
  4. 4.Environmental System Research DivisionKorea Institute of Machinery and MaterialsDaejeonRepublic of Korea
  5. 5.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of NevadaRenoUSA
  6. 6.School of Molecular SciencesArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations