Effect of Increasing Salinity on Development of Giant Reed (Arundo donax) from Rhizome and Culms

Article

Abstract

Arundo donax (giant reed) has great potential for bioenergy biomass production in constructed wetlands. Large scale use of A. donax in constructed wetlands will require the use of either established plants sourced from nurseries, or the use of cuttings or rhizomes and stems from mother plants derived from nurseries or wild stands. The results of this study suggest that cuttings and rhizomes are not sensitive to salinity up to an EC ~ 4500 µS cm− 1. Plants used to establish a constructed wetland should have stems of at least 300 mm length, with well established roots. Moreover, culms will emerge from small pieces of stems with viable nodes regardless of salinity, albeit the fresher the water the less likely salinity will subsequently affect the emerging shoot. From a practical perspective, this suggests that wetlands can be planted with giant reed using horizontally laid stems. Unless using plants pre-stressed to a salinity matching that of the wastewater to be treated, giant reed should be established using reasonable quality water (EC < 1000 µS cm− 1) until the plants are of a reasonable size, e.g. > 500 mm in height, after which undiluted wastewater can be used.

Keywords

Arundo donax Hydroponic toxicity test Shoot growth Rhizome Node Culm emergence 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research was primarily supported by the Victorian Government Sustainability Fund, managed by Sustainability Victoria. Additional support was provided by the Department of Primary Industries (DPI Project# 08160). GA gives his thanks to staff at DPI Queenscliff centre for help sorting and labelling giant reed cuttings.

References

  1. ABS (2012) 1301.0—Year Book Australia, 2012. Australian Bureau of Statistics. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/1301.0~2012~Main%20Features~Water~279. Accessed June 2017
  2. Allinson G, Halliwell DJ, Stokes J (2007) Closing the loop on a large, multi-disciplinary dairy waste project. Aust J Dairy Technol 62:135–153Google Scholar
  3. Boland JM (2006) The importance of layering the rapid spread of Arundo donax (giant reed). Madrono 53:303–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bransby DI (2002) Method of propagating fibercane (Arundo). Patent no. US 6,389,746 B1. http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6389746.html
  5. Brisson J, Chazarenc F (2009) Maximizing pollutant removal in constructed wetlands: should we pay more attention to macrophyte species selection? Sci Total Environ 407:3923–3930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ceotto E, Di Candilo M (2010) Shoot cuttings propagation of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) in water and moist soil: the path forward? Biomass Bioenerg 34:1614–1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hamilton AJ, Stagnitti F, Xiong X, Kreidl SL, Benke KK, Maher P (2007) Wastewater irrigation: the state of play. Vadose Zone J 6(4):823–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hoshovsky M (2003) Element Stewardship Abstract for Arundo donax, Giant Reed. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia. http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/esadocs/documnts/arundon.rtf. Accessed April 2007
  9. Idris SM, Jones PL, Salzman SA, Croatto G, Allinson G (2012) Evaluation of the giant reed (Arundo donax) in horizontal subsurface flow wetlands for the treatment of dairy processing factory wastewater. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19(8):3525–3537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lissner J, Schierup H-H (1997) Effects of salinity on the growth of Phragmites australis. Aquat Bot 55:247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Peck GG (1998) Hydroponic growth characteristics of Arundo donax L. under salt stress. In: Bell CE (ed) Arundo and saltcedar: the deadly duo, Proceedings of a workshop on combating the threat from Arundo and Saltcedar; June 17, 1998; Ontario, CAGoogle Scholar
  12. Perdue RE (1958) Arundo donax—source of musical reeds and industrial cellulose. Econ Bot 12:368–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Salzman SA, Scarborough H, Allinson G (2017) Exploring the economic viability of using constructed wetlands to manage waste-water in the dairy industry. Aust J Environ Manag. doi:10.1080/14486563.2017.1328711 Google Scholar
  14. Snapp SS, Shennan C (1992) Effects of salinity on root growth and death dynamics of tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. New Phytol 121:71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Williams C, Biswas T (2010) Commercial potential of giant reed for pulp, paper and biofuel production. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, BartonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ScienceRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations