Advertisement

Groundwater Modeling and Remediation Scenarios of a Hexavalent Chromium Plume Released from an Industrial Site

  • Zoi DokouEmail author
  • George P. Karatzas
  • Iraklis Panagiotakis
  • Dimitris Dermatas
Article

Abstract

In recent years, high concentrations of hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] have been found in the groundwater system of the Asopos River Basin. This work focuses on a Cr(VI) plume detected in the industrial area of Inofyta, the most important contamination hot spot of the Asopos River Basin. A groundwater flow and Cr(VI) transport model was developed to assess the behaviour of the plume and investigate the location of a suspected nearby source zone. According to the model results, the suspected source zone location is highly probable and the Cr(VI) plume does not migrate significantly. Based on the above findings, it is believed that the remediation effort could potentially be very effective in the area, if the remediation plan is designed properly. In order to assess the remediation potential of (a) natural attenuation and (b) polyphenol-coated nZVI treatment, two model scenarios were created and their results were compared and discussed.

Keywords

Hexavalent chromium Asopos Groundwater contamination Heavy metals Groundwater remediation Inofyta 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was co-funded by the European Union in the LIFE10 ENV/GR/000601 project: CHARM—Chromium in Asopos Groundwater System: Remediation Technologies and Measures.

References

  1. Andrews CB, Neville CJ (2003) Ground water flow in a desert basin: challenges of simulating transport of dissolved chromium. Groundwater 41(2):219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakis R, Tuncan A (2011) An investigation of heavy metal and migration through groundwater from the landfill area of Eskisehir in Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 176:87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dermatas D, Panagiotakis I, Mpouras T, Tettas K (2016) Anthropogenic versus geogenic hexavalent chromium in two different aquifers in Greece. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol (submitted)Google Scholar
  4. Dhakate R, Singh VS, Hodlur GK (2008) Impact assessment of chromite mining on groundwater through simulation modeling study in Sukinda chromite mining area, Orissa, India. J Hazard Mater 160:535–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dokou Z, Karagiorgi V, Karatzas GP, Nikolaidis NP, Kalogerakis N (2016) Large scale groundwater flow and hexavalent chromium transport modeling under current and future climatic conditions: the case of Asopos River Basin. Environ Sci Pollut R 23(6):5307–5321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Economou-Eliopoulos M, Antivachi D, Vasilatos C, Megremi I (2012) Evaluation of the Cr(VI) and other toxic element contamination and their potential sources: the case of the Thiva basin (Greece). Geosci Front 3(4):523–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hellerich LA, Nikolaidis NP (2005) Sorption studies of mixed chromium and chlorinated ethenes at the field and laboratory scales. J Environ Manage 75:77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jacobs JA, Testa MS (2005) Overview of chromium(VI) in the environment: background and history. In: Guertin J, Jacobs JA, Avakian C (eds) Chromium handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 23–92Google Scholar
  9. Moraetis D, Nikolaidis NP, Karatzas GP, Dokou Z, Kalogerakis N, Winkel LHE, Palaiogianni-Bellou A (2012) Origin and mobility of hexavalent chromium in North-Eastern Attica, Greece. Appl Geochem 27:1170–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mystrioti C, Sparis D, Papasiopi N, Xenidis A, Dermatas D, Chrysochoou M (2015) Assessment of polyphenol coated nano zero valent iron for hexavalent chromium removal from contaminated waters. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 94:302–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mystrioti C, Xanthopoulou TD, Tsakiridis P, Papassiopi N, Xenidis A (2016) Comparative evaluation of five plant extracts and juices for nanoiron synthesis and application for hexavalent chromium reduction. Sci Total Environ 539:105–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Panagiotakis I, Dermatas D, Vatseris C, Chrysochoou M, Papassiopi N, Xenidis A, Vaxevanidou K (2015) Forensic investigation of a chromium(VI) groundwater plume in Thiva, Greece. J Hazard Mater 281:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tantemsapya N, Naksakul Y, Wirojanagud W (2011) Mathematical modeling of heavy metals contamination from MSW landfill site in Khon Kaen, Thailand. Water Sci Technol 64(9):1835–1842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tziritis E, Kelepertzis E, Korres G, Perivolaris D, Repani S (2012) Hexavalent chromium contamination in groundwaters of Thiva basin, central Greece. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 89:1073–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Vasilatos C, Megremi I, Economou-Eliopoulos M, Mitsis I (2008) Hexavalent chromium and other toxic elements in natural waters in Thiva-Tanagra-Malakasa basin, Greece. Hell J Geosci 43:57–66Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Environmental EngineeringTechnical University of CreteChaniaGreece
  2. 2.School of Civil EngineeringNational Technical University of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations