Advertisement

Olfactory Sampling Recovery Following Sublethal Copper Exposure in the Rusty Crayfish, Orconectes rusticus

  • Sara E. Lahman
  • Paul A. Moore
Article

Abstract

Increasing levels of anthropogenic chemicals within an aquatic ecosystem may inhibit animals from extracting information from chemical signals. We investigated whether antennular flicking, a behavioral mechanism involved in chemically-mediated behaviors of the rusty crayfish, Orconectes rusticus, was altered following a sublethal copper exposure (450 µg/L). Crayfish exposed to copper exhibited lower flicking rates than control crayfish and were significantly less successful in their ability to orient to a food odor. Copper was then eliminated from the housing tanks, providing a recovery period. Groups of crayfish were assayed for antennular flicking rates and orientation success three times over the course of the 21 day recovery period. Crayfish demonstrated significant increases in rates of successful localization of odors and antennular flicking during this portion of the experiment. These results indicate that the mechanism by which copper impairs chemoreception in the rusty crayfish is reversible if elevated levels of copper concentrations are eliminated from aquatic ecosystems contaminated by runoff from agricultural or aquacultural chemicals.

Keywords

Olfactory sampling recovery Sublethal toxicity Copper Orconectes rusticus Crayfish 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank members of the Laboratory for Sensory Ecology for their aid in manuscript review and Dr. Rachelle M. Belanger of the University of Detroit Mercy for the use of analytical software. This research was supported by the Larry and Linda Oman Graduate Research in Ecology and Environmental Biology Scholarship and the Mary Ellen Mazey Women In Science Fellowship awarded to SE Lahman.

References

  1. Azizishirazi A, Pyle GG (2015) Recovery of olfactory mediated behaviours of fish from metal contaminated lakes. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 95:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azizishrazi A, Dew WA, Frostyh HL, Pyle GG (2013) Olfactory recovery of wild yellow perch from metal contaminated lakes. Ecotox Environ Safe 88:42–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belanger RM, Moore PA (2009) The role of the major chelae in localization and sampling of female odours by male crayfish, Orconectes rusticus (Girard, 1852). Crustaceana 82(6):653–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergman DA, Kozlowski C, McIntyre JC, Huber R, Daws AG, Moore PA (2003) Temporal dynamics and communication of winner-effects in the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. Behaviour 140:805–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bettini S, Ciani F, Franceschini V (2006) Recovery of the olfactory receptor neurons in the African Tilapia mariae following exposure to low copper level. Aquat Toxicol 76(3):321–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blinova NK, Cherkashin SA (2012) The olfactory system of crustaceans as a model for ecologo-toxicological studies. J Evol Biochem Physiol 48(2):155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dorn NJ, Wojdak JM (2004) The role of omnivorous crayfish in littoral communities. Oecologia 140(1):150–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gerlach G, Atema J, Kingsford MJ, Black KP, Miller-Sims V (2007) Smelling home can prevent dispersal of reef fish larvae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(3):858–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gherardi F, Acquistapace P, Hazlett BA, Whisson G (2002) Behavioural response to alarm odours in indigenous and non-indigenous crayfish species: a case study from Western Australia. Mar Freshw Res 53:93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grasso FW, Basil JA (2002) How lobsters, crayfishes, and crabs locate sources of odor: current perspectives and future directions. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12:721–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Holdich DM (2002) Biology of freshwater crayfish. Blackwell Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Julliard AK, Saucier D, Astic L (1993) Effects of chronic low-level copper exposure on ultrastructure of the olfactory system in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Histol Histopathol 8:655–672Google Scholar
  13. Keller TA, Moore PA (1999) Effects of ontogeny and odors on behavior, the influence of crayfish size and fish odors on crayfish movement. Mar Freshw Behav Physiol 33:35–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kraus-Epley KE, Moore PA (2002) Bilateral and unilateral lesions alter orientation abilities of the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. Chem Senses 27:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Koehl MAR, Koseff JR. Crimaldi JP, McCay MG, Cooper T, Wiley MB, Moore PA (2001) Lobster sniffing: antennule design and hydrodynamic filtering of information in an odor plume. Science 294(5548):1948–1951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lahman SE, Trent KR, Moore PA (2015) Sublethal copper toxicity impairs chemical orientation in the crayfish Orconectes rustics. Ecotox Environ Safe 113:369–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Levene H (1960) Robust tests for the equality of variances. In: Olkin I (ed) Contributions to probability and statistics: essays in honor of Harold Hotelling. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, pp 278–292Google Scholar
  18. Mellon D (2012) Smelling, feeling, tasting and touching: behavioral and neural integration of antennular chemosensory and mechanosensory inputs in the crayfish. J Exp Biol 215(13):2163–2172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Momot WT (1995) Redefining the role of crayfish in aquatic ecosystems. Rev Fish Sci 3(1):33–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moore PA, Bergman DA (2005) The smell of success and failure, the role of intrinsic and extrinsic chemical signals on the social behavior of crayfish. Integr Comp Biol 45:650–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moore PA, Grills JL (1999) Chemical orientation to food by the crayfish Orconectes rusticus, influence of hydrodynamics. Anim Behav 58:953–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moore PA, Kraus-Epley KE (2013) The impact of odor and ambient flow speed on the kinematics of the crayfish antennular flick: implications for sampling turbulent odor plumes. J Crust Biol 33(6):772–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) (2010) Document No. DSW/EAS, 2010-4-4/Division of Surface WaterGoogle Scholar
  24. Olsén KH (2011) Effects of pollutants on olfactory mediated behaviors in fish and crustaceans. In: Breithaupt T, Thiel M (eds) Chemical communication in crustaceans. Springer, LLC, New York, pp 507–528Google Scholar
  25. Sherba M, Dunhman DW, Harvey HH (2000) Sublethal copper toxicity and food response in the freshwater crayfish Cambarus bartonii (Cambaridae, Decapoda, Crustacea). Ecotox Environ Safe 46:329–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smee DL, Weissburg MJ (2006) Clamming up, environmental forces diminish the perceptive ability of bivalve prey. Ecology 87(6):1587–1598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Song CK, Johnstone LM, Edwards DH, Derby CD, Schmidt M (2009) Cellular basis of neurogenesis in the brain of crayfish, Procambarus clarkii: neurogenic complex in the olfactory midbrain from hatchlings to adults. Arthropod Struct Dev 38(4):339–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sutterlin AM (1974) Pollutants and the chemical senses of aquatic animals: perspective and review. Chem Senses Flavor 1:167–178Google Scholar
  29. Taylor RM, Watson GD, Alikhan MA (1995) Comparative sub-lethal and lethal acute toxicity of copper to the freshwater crayfish, Cambarus robustus (Cambaridae, Decapoda, Crustacea) from an acidic metal-contaminated lake and a circumneutral uncontaminated stream. Water Res 29(2):401–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tilton F, Tilton SC, Bammler TK, Beyer R, Farin F, Stapleton PL, Gallagher EP (2008) Transcriptional biomarkers and mechanisms of copper-induced olfactory injury in zebrafish. Environ Sci Technol 42(24):9404–9411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilcove DS, Master L (2005) How many endangered species are there in the United States? Front Ecol Environ 3:414–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wolf MC, Voigt R, Moore PA (2004) Spatial arrangement of odor sources modifies the temproal aspects fo crayfish search strategies. J Chem Ecol 30:501–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yen J, Weissburg MJ, Doall MH (1998) The fluid physics of signal perception by mate-tracking copepods. Philos Trans Roy Soc B 353:787–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zar J (1984) Biostatistical analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory for Sensory Ecology, Department of Biological SciencesBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA

Personalised recommendations