Development of Multiple Linear Regression Models for Predicting the Stormwater Quality of Urban Sub-Watersheds

Article

Abstract

Stormwater management at urban sub-watershed level has been envisioned to include stormwater collection, treatment, and disposal of treated stormwater through groundwater recharging. Sizing, operation and control of the stormwater management systems require information on the quantities and characteristics of the stormwater generated. Stormwater characteristics depend upon dry spell between two successive rainfall events, intensity of rainfall and watershed characteristics. However, sampling and analysis of stormwater, spanning only few rainfall events, provides insufficient information on the characteristics. An attempt has been made in the present study to assess the stormwater characteristics through regression modeling. Stormwater of five sub-watersheds of Patiala city were sampled and analyzed. The results obtained were related with the antecedent dry periods and with the intensity of the rainfall event through regression modeling. Obtained regression models were used to assess the stormwater quality for various antecedent dry periods and rainfall event intensities.

Keywords

Multiple regression analysis Regression models Stormwater characteristics Urban stormwater management 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Thapar University, Patiala for providing the laboratory facilities to undertake the task of testing and analysis.

References

  1. APHA (1999) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Arora AS, Reddy AS (2012) Multivariate analysis for assessing the quality of stormwater from different urban surfaces of the Patiala city, Punjab (India). Urban Water J. doi: 10.1080/1573062X.2012.739629 Google Scholar
  3. Ball JE, Jenks R, Aubourg D (1998) An assessment of the availability of pollutant constituents on road surfaces. Sci Total Environ 209:243–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brezonik PL, Stadelmann TH (2002) Analysis and predictive models of stormwater runoff volumes, loads, and pollutant concentrations from watersheds in the Twin Cities metropolitan area, Minnesota, USA. Water Res 36:1743–1757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caltrans (2000) Guidance manual: stormwater monitoring protocols, Report No. CTSW-RT-00-005. Sacramento, CA: California Department of TransportationGoogle Scholar
  6. FHWA, Federal Highway Administration (1996) Evaluation and management of highway runoff water quality. In: Report No. FHWA-PD-96-032, U.S. Department of Transportation, 480Google Scholar
  7. Gan HY, Zhuo MN, Li DQ, Zhou YZ (2008) Quality characterization and impact assessment of highway runoff in urban and rural area of Guangzhou, China. Environ Monit Assess 140(1–3):147–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Graves G, Wan Y, Fike L (2004) Water quality characteristics of stormwater from major land uses in South Florida. J Am Water Resour Assoc 40:1405–1419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Irish LB, Barrett ME, Malina JF, Charbeneau RJ (1998) Use of regression models for analyzing highway storm-water loads. J Environ Eng 124(10):987–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kafi M, Gasperi J, Moilleron R, Gromaire MC, Chebbo G (2008) Spatial variability of the characteristics of combined wet weather pollutant loads in Paris. Water Res 42:539–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kayhanian M, Suverkropp C, Ruby A, Tsay K (2007) Characterization and prediction of highway runoff constituent event mean concentration. J Environ Manage 85:279–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim LH, Kayhanian M, Lau SL, Stenstrom MK (2005) A new modeling approach in estimating first flush metal mass loading. Water Sci Technol 51(3–4):159–167Google Scholar
  13. Kim LH, Zoh KD, Jeong S, Kayhanian M, Stenstrom MK (2006) Estimating pollutant mass accumulation on highways during dry periods. J Environ Eng 132(9):985–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee JH, Bang KW, Ketchum LH, Choe JS, Yu MJ (2002) First flush analysis of urban storm runoff. Sci Total Environ 193:163–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Phillips BC, Thompson G (2002) Virtual stormwater management planning in the 21st century. Ninth International Conference on Urban Drainage, Portland, OregonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Saget A, Chebbo G, Bertrand-Krajewski JL (1996) The first flush in sewer systems. Water Sci Technol 33(9):101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Smullen JT, Shallcross AL, Cave KA (1999) Updating the U.S. nationwide urban runoff quality date base. Water Sci Technol 39(12):9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Taebi A, Droste RL (2004) Pollution loads in urban runoff and sanitary wastewater. Sci Total Environ 327:175–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. The Environment (Protection) Rules (1986) Schedule-VI, General standards for discharge of environmental pollutants part A: effluentsGoogle Scholar
  20. Thomson NR, Mcbean EA, Snodgrass W, Monstrenko IB (1997) Highway stormwater runoff quality: development surrogate parameter relationships. Water Air Soil Pollut 94:307–347Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Energy and EnvironmentThapar UniversityPatialaIndia

Personalised recommendations