Advertisement

Effects of Sediment Containing Coal Ash from the Kingston Ash Release on Embryo-Larval Development in the Fathead Minnow, Pimephales promelas (Rafinesque, 1820)

  • Mark S. GreeleyJr.Email author
  • Logan R. Elmore
  • Mary K. McCracken
  • Rick M. Sherrard
Article

Abstract

The largest environmental release of coal ash in US history occurred in December 2008 with the failure of a retention structure at the Tennessee Valley Authority Kingston Fossil Fuel Plant in East Tennessee. A byproduct of coal-burning power plants, coal ash is enriched in metals and metalloids such as selenium and arsenic with known toxicity to fish embryonic and larval life stages. The early development of fish embryos and larvae during contact exposures to river bottom sediments containing up to 78 % coal ash from the Kingston spill was examined in 7-day laboratory tests with the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). No significant effects were observed in hatching success, incidences of developmental abnormalities, or embryo-larval survival. Results suggest that direct exposures to sediment containing residual coal ash from the Kingston ash release may not present a significant risk to fish eggs and larvae in waterways affected by the coal ash spill.

Keywords

Coal ash Toxicity Fish Early life stages Selenium Teratogenicity Mercury 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was sponsored by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). Colleagues who contributed included S. Marshall Adams, Gail Morris, Mark Peterson, Jay Tenney, and Kristin Ward of ORNL; Neil Carriker and Tyler Baker of TVA; and Daniel Jones of ARCADIS. ORNL is managed by UT Battelle, LLC, for the US Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-00OR22725. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

References

  1. Besser JM, Giesy JP, Brown RW, Buell JM, Dawson GA (1996) Selenium bioaccumulation and hazards in a fish community affected by coal ash effluent. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 35:7–15Google Scholar
  2. Breder CM, Rosen DE (1966) Modes of reproduction in fishes. Natural History Press, Garden City, NYGoogle Scholar
  3. Carriker N, Yankee D, Sherrard R, Jones D, Young S, Clay P (2011) Integrated ecological research—TVA Kingston ash recovery project. Abstracts: TVA—Kingston fly ash release environmental research symposium, August 2–3, 2011:1Google Scholar
  4. Chatterjee R (2009a) Environews forum: TVA spill’s chemical legacy. Environ Health Perspect 117:A346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chatterjee R (2009b) Coal-ash spills highlight ongoing risk to ecosystems. Environ Sci Technol 49:3003–3004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaudhary S, Banerjee DK (2007) Speciation of some heavy metals in coal fly ash. Chem Speciation Bioavailability 19:95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coyle JJ, Buckler DR, Ingersoll CG, Fairchild JF, May TW (1993) Effect of dietary selenium on the reproductive success of bluegills (Lepomis macrochirus). Environ Toxicol Chem 12:551–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deonarine A, Bartov G, Johnson TM, Ruhl L, Vengosh A, Hsu-Kim H (2013) Environmental impacts of the Tennessee Valley Authority Kingston coal ash spill. 2. Effect of coal ash on methylmercury in historically contaminated river sediments. Environ Sci Technol 47:2100–2108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Devlin EW (2006) Acute toxicity, uptake and histopathology of aqueous methyl mercury to fathead minnow embryos. Ecotoxicology 15:97–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamilton SJ (2004) Review of selenium toxicity in the aquatic food chain. Sci Total Environ 326:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ishaque AB, Tchounwou PB, Wilson BA (2004) Developmental arrest in Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) embryos exposed to sublethal concentrations of atrazine and arsenic trioxide. J Environ Biol 25:1–6Google Scholar
  12. Jacobs Engineering (2011) Kingston ash recovery project, on-scene coordinator report for the time-critical removal action at the TVA Kingston Fossil Fuel Plant release site, Roan County, Tennessee. Document No. EPA-AO-030. http://www.tva.gov/kingston/pdf/OSC%20Report%202011-03-31%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed 24 June 2013
  13. Jezierska B, Lugowska K, Witeska M (2009) The effects of heavy metals on embryonic development of fish (a review). Fish Physiol Biochem 35:625–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jin L-J, Guo P, Xu X-Q (1997) Effect of selenium on mercury methylation in anaerobic lake sediments. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 59:994–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jin L-J, Guo P, Xu X-Q (1999) Effect of selenium on mercury methylation in facultative lake sediments. Toxicol Environ Chem 69:255–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lemly AD (2002) Symptoms and implications of selenium toxicity in fish: the Belews Lake case example. Aquat Toxicol 57:39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lemly AD, Skorupa JP (2012) Wildlife and coal waste policy debate: proposed rules for coal waste disposal ignore lessons from 45 years of wildlife poisoning. Environ Sci Technol 46:8595–8600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Muscatello JR, Bennett PM, Himbeault KT, Belknap AM, Janz DM (2006) Larval deformities associated with selenium accumulation in northern pike (Esox lucius) exposed to metal mining effluent. Environ Sci Technol 40:6505–6512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Otter RR, Bailey FC, Fortner AM, Adams SM (2012) Trophic status and metal bioaccumulation differences in multiple fish species exposed to coal ash-associated metals. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 85:30–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Otter RR, Hayden M, Mathews T, Fortner AM, Bailey FC (2013) The use of tetragnathid spiders as bioindicators of metal exposure at a coal ash spill site. Environ Toxicol Chem 32:2065–2068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rowe CL, Hopkins WA, Congdon JD (2002) Ecotoxicological implications of aquatic disposal of coal combustion residue in the United States: a review. Environ Monit Assess 80:207–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ruhl L, Vengosh A, Dwyer GS, Hsu-Kim H, Deonarine A, Bergin M, Kravchenko J (2009) Survey of the potential environmental and health impacts in the immediate aftermath of the coal ash spill in Kingston, Tennessee. Environ Sci Technol 43:6326–6333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ruhl L, Vengosh A, Dwyer GS, Hsu-Kim H, Deonarine A (2010) Environmental impacts of the coal ash spill in Kingston, Tennessee: an 18-month survey. Environ Sci Technol 44:9272–9278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tennessee Valley Authority (2009a) Action memorandum: request for removal action at the TVA Kingston Fossil Fuel Plant release site, Roane County, Tennessee. http://www.tva.com/kingston/memo.htm. Accessed 24 June 2013
  25. Tennessee Valley Authority (2009b) Quality assurance plan, phase 1 Emory River dredging, TVA Kingston Fossil Plant ash recovery project, March 18, 2009. http://www.tva.gov/kingston/admin_record/pdf/TC/TC8.pdf. Accessed 17 October 2013
  26. Tennessee Valley Authority (2012) Kingston ash recovery project, non-time critical removal action, river system, baseline ecological risk assessment (BERA). Tennessee Valley Authority EPA-AO-050Google Scholar
  27. United State Environmental Protection Agency (1983) Methods for chemical analysis of water and wastes. US EPA/600/4-79/020Google Scholar
  28. United State Environmental Protection Agency (2002) Short-term methods for estimating the chronic toxicity of effluent and receiving waters to freshwater organisms. US EPA/821/R/02/013Google Scholar
  29. United State Environmental Protection Agency (2009) EPA to oversee cleanup of TVA Kingston Fossil Fuel Plant release, May 11, 2009. EPA Region 4, Office of External Affairs, Atlanta, GA. http://www.epa.gov/region4/kingston/index.html. Accessed 24 June 2013
  30. Yudovich YE, Ketris MP (2005a) Arsenic in coal: a review. Int J Coal Geol 61:141–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yudovich YE, Ketris MP (2005b) Mercury in coal: a review. Part 1. Geochemistry. Int J Coal Geol 62:107–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yudovich YE, Ketris MP (2006) Selenium in coal: a review. Int J Coal Geol 67:112–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA)  2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark S. GreeleyJr.
    • 1
    Email author
  • Logan R. Elmore
    • 1
  • Mary K. McCracken
    • 1
  • Rick M. Sherrard
    • 2
  1. 1.Environmental Sciences DivisionOak Ridge National LaboratoryOak RidgeUSA
  2. 2.Tennessee Valley AuthorityChattanoogaUSA

Personalised recommendations