Arsenic Toxicity on Ludwigia octovalvis in Spiked Sand

  • Harmin Sulistiyaning Titah
  • Siti Rozaimah Sheikh Abdullah
  • Idris Mushrifah
  • Nurina Anuar
  • Hassan Basri
  • Muhammad Mukhlisin
Article

Abstract

Wilting, especially of the leaves, was observed as an initial symptom of arsenate [As(V)] to Ludwigia octovalvis (Jacq.) P. H. Raven. The plants tolerated As(V) levels of 39 mg kg−1 for as long as 35 days of exposure. After 91 days, the maximum concentration of As uptake in the plant occurred at As(V) concentration of 65 mg kg−1 while As concentration in the stems, roots and leaves were 6139.9 ± 829.5, 1284.5 ± 242.9 and 1126.1 ± 117.2 mg kg−1, respectively. In conclusion, As(V) could cause toxic effects in L. octovalvis and the plants could uptake and accumulate As in plant tissues.

Keywords

Arsenic Phytotoxicity Uptake Accumulation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Tasik Chini Research, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) and Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia of UKM-KK-03-FRGS 0119-2010 for funding this research, and the Ministry of National Education of the Republic of Indonesia for providing the scholarship for the first author.

References

  1. ATSDR (2007) Toxicological profile for arsenic. Public Health Service Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesGoogle Scholar
  2. Barber SA (1984) Soil Nutrient bioavaibility a mechanistic approach. John Willey and Sons, IncGoogle Scholar
  3. Bondada BR, Ma LQ (2003) Chapter 28: Tolerance of heavy metals in vascular plants: arsenic hyperaccumulation by Chinese, Brake Fern (Pteris vittata L.). In: Chandra S, Srivastava M, (eds) Pteridology In The New Millennium, Kluwer Academic Publishers, p 397–420Google Scholar
  4. Concenco G, Galon L (2011) Plasmodesmata: symplastic transport of herbicides within the plants. In: Larramendy, M (eds) Herbicides, Theory and Applications, p 455–470, In TechGoogle Scholar
  5. Dahmani-Muller H, van Oort F, Gelie B, Balabane M (2000) Strategies of heavy metal uptake by three plant species growing near a metal smelter. Environ Pollut 109:231–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Department of Environment, Malaysia (Jabatan Alam Sekitar, Malaysia) (2009) Contaminated Land Management and Control Guidelines No. 1: Malaysian Recommended Site Screening Levels for Contaminated Land, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  7. Gonzaga MIS, Santos JAG, Ma LQ (2006) Arsenic phytoextraction and hyper-accumulation by fern species. Sci Agric (Piracicaba, Braz) 63(1):90–101Google Scholar
  8. ISO 11269-2 (1995) Soil quality—determination of the effects of pollutants on soil flora—effects of chemicals on the emergence and growth of higher plantsGoogle Scholar
  9. Kabata AP, Pendias H (2001) Trace elements in soils and plants, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  10. Kalra YP (1998) Handbook of references method for plant analysis. CRC Press, Boca RotanGoogle Scholar
  11. Nicholson, HC (2002) Arsenic in plants important to two Yukon first nations: impacts of gold mining and reclamation practices. MERG (Mining Environment Research Group) reportsGoogle Scholar
  12. OECD, Organization for economic co-operation and development (1984) guidelines for testing of chemicals 208, Terrestrial Plants, Growth TestGoogle Scholar
  13. Pathan AK, Bond J, Gaskin RE (2008) Sample preparation for scanning electron microscopy of plant surfaces—Horses for courses. Micron 39(8):1049–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Quaghebeur M, Rengel Z (2003) The distribution of arsenate and arsenite in shoots and roots of Holcus lanatus is influenced by arsenic tolerance and arsenate and phosphate supply. Plant Physiol 132:1600–1609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Quaghebeur M, Rengel Z (2005) Arsenic speciation governs arsenic uptake and transport in terrestrial plant. Microchim Acta 151:141–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Quevauviller PH (1998) Methodologies in soil and sediment fractionation studies, single and sequential extraction procedures. Royal Society of Chemistry, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. Rahman A, Amelia A, Nazri A, Mushrifah I, Ahmad NS, Soffian JA (2009) Screening of Plants Grown in Petrosludge-A Preliminary Study towards Toxicity Testing in Phytoremediation. Colloquium on UKM—PRSB Phytoremediation, Malaysia, AugustGoogle Scholar
  18. Rattanawat C, Rujira S, Narupot P, Maleeya K, Prayad P (2011) Effect of soil amendments on growth and metal uptake by Ocimum gratissimum grown in Cd/Zn-contaminated soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 214:383–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Smith E, Naidu R, Alston AM (1998) Arsenic in The Soil Environment: A Review. Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Titah HS, Abdullah SRS, Anuar N, Idris M, Basri H, Mukhlisin M (2012) Arsenic range finding phytotoxicity test against Ludwigia octovalvis as first step in phytoremediation. Res J Environ Toxicol 6(4):151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. USEPA (1996) SW 846: Method 3050B—acid digestion of sediments. Sludge and Soils, Rev 2Google Scholar
  22. Zhang W, Cai Y, Tu C, Ma LQ (2002) Arsenic speciation and distribution in an arsenic hyper accumulator plant. Sci Total Environ 300:167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harmin Sulistiyaning Titah
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  • Siti Rozaimah Sheikh Abdullah
    • 1
  • Idris Mushrifah
    • 3
  • Nurina Anuar
    • 1
  • Hassan Basri
    • 2
  • Muhammad Mukhlisin
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built EnvironmentUniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaBangiMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built EnvironmentUniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaBangiMalaysia
  3. 3.Faculty of Science and Technology, Tasik Chini Research CentreUniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaBangiMalaysia
  4. 4.Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and PlanningInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS)Keputih, Sukolilo, SurabayaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations