Advertisement

The Influence of DOC Trends on Light Climate and Periphyton Biomass in the Ganga River, Varanasi, India

  • Usha PandeyEmail author
Article

Abstract

Investigations on periphyton along an eutrophication gradient (NO3  = 0.23−0.96 mg L−1; PO 4 −3  = 0.16−0.86 mg L−1) of Ganga River indicated that benthic algal biomass decreased with increasing concentrations of nutrients and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Periphyton biomass showed negative relationship (R 2 = 0.98; p < 0.0001) with DOC and positive relationship (R 2 = 0.96; p < 0.0001) with Secchi depth. Sites with high DOC showed dominance of cyanophycean Phormidium uncinatum. The study shows that the rising concentration of DOC over time may alter the light climate and consequently the fate of benthic primary producers in Ganga River.

Keywords

Ganga River Dissolved organic carbon Light climate Nutrients Periphyton 

References

  1. APHA (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergstrom AK, Jansson M, Blomqvist P, Drakare S (2001) The influence of water colour and effective light climate on mixotrophic phytoflagellates in three small Swedish dystrophic lakes. Int Assoc Theor Appl Limnol 27:1861–1865Google Scholar
  3. Biggs BJF, Kilroy C (2000) Stream periphyton monitoring manual. NIWA, ChristchurchGoogle Scholar
  4. Carey RO, Vellidis G, Lowrance R, Pringle CM (2007) Do nutrient limit algal periphyton in small black-water coastal plain streams. J Am Water Resour Assoc 5:1183–1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elser JJ, Fagan FW, Denno RF, Dobberfuhl DR, Folarin A, Huberty A, Interlandi S, Kilham SS, Mc Cauley E, Schulz KL, Siemann EH, Sterner RW (2000) Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs. Nature 408:578–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Evans CD, Chapman PJ, Clark JM, Monteith DT, Cresser MS (2006) Alternative explanations for rising dissolved organic carbon export from organic soils. Glob Change Biol 12:2044–2053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Karlsson J, Bystrom P, Ask J, Ask P, Persson L, Jansson M (2009) Light limitation of nutrient-poor lake ecosystems. Nature 460:506–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Luijn FV, van der Molen DT, Luttmer WJ, Boers PCM (1995) Influence of benthic diatoms on the nutrient release from sediments of shallow lakes recovering from eutrophication. Water Sci Technol 32:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mackereth FJH (1963) Some methods of water analysis for limnologists, vol 21. Freshwater Biological Association, AmlesideGoogle Scholar
  10. Maiti SK (2001) Handbook of methods in environmental studies (Vol.1,Water and Wastewater). ABD Publisher, JaipurGoogle Scholar
  11. McEachern P, Prepas EE, Gibson JJ, Dinsmore WP (2000) Forest fire induced impacts on phosphorus, nitrogen and chlorophyll a concentrations in boreal subarctic lakes of northern Alberta. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Michel P (1984) Ecological methods for field and laboratory investigation. Tata McGraw–Hill Publ Comp, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  13. Pandey J, Pandey U (2009) Microbial processes at land water interface and cross-domain causal relationships as influenced by atmospheric deposition of pollutants in three freshwater lakes in India. Lakes Reserv: Res Manag 14:71–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pandey U, Pandey J (2012) Impacts of DOC trends resulting from changing climatic extremes and atmospheric deposition chemistry on periphyton community of a freshwater tropical lake of India. Biogeochemistry. doi: 10.1007/s10533-012-9747-7 Google Scholar
  15. Vadeboncoeur Y, Jeppesen E, Zanden MJV, Schierup H-H, Christoffersen K, Lodge DM (2003) From Greenland to green lakes: cultural eutrophication and the loss of benthic pathways in lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 48:1408–1418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Voghe AL (1971) A text book of quantitative inorganic analysis, 4th edn. The English Language Book Society/Longman, EssexGoogle Scholar
  17. Yang Y, He Z, Lin Y, Philips EJ, Yang J, Chem G, Stoffella PJ, Powell CA (2008) Temporal and spatial variations of nutrients in the Ten Mile Creek of South Florida, USA and effects on phytoplankton. J Environ Monit 4:508–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Botany, Faculty of Science and TechnologyMahatma Gandhi Kashividyapith UniversityVaranasiIndia

Personalised recommendations