Does mental health-related discrimination predict health service use 2 years later? Findings from an Australian national survey
Stigma and discrimination are central concerns for people with mental health problems. The aim of the study was to carry out a follow-up survey of a national survey of experiences of avoidance, discrimination and positive treatment in people with mental health problems to explore how those experiences relate to health service use.
In 2017, telephone interviews were carried out with 655 Australians aged 18+, who had participated in a 2014 survey and reported a mental health problem or scored highly on a symptom screening questionnaire. Questions covered mental health, disclosure, health service utilisation, and experiences of avoidance, discrimination and positive treatment in a variety of different settings. Regression analyses were used to assess the extent to which count of settings of experiences of avoidance, discrimination or positive treatment at baseline (2014) or follow-up (2017) predicted health service use at follow-up.
An increase in past experiences of discrimination was associated with a greater number of visits to hospital or specialist doctors and an increase in positive treatment was associated with a greater number of visits to a mental health professional. Increases in both positive and negative experiences were associated with greater healthcare costs, but the costs were greatest for discrimination at follow-up (concurrent discrimination), primarily due to the cost of nights in hospital.
While both discrimination and positive treatment are associated with greater healthcare costs, concurrent experiences were shown to be more important correlates of health service use than past experiences. Moreover, those in supportive environments may be more willing to engage in earlier evidence-based treatment for mental health problems.
KeywordsMental disorders Stigma Discrimination Health service use
The study was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- 1.Lasalvia A, Zoppei S, Van Bortel T, Bonetto C, Cristofalo D, Wahlbeck K, Bacle SV, Van Audenhove C, van Weeghel J, Reneses B, Germanavicius A, Economou M, Lanfredi M, Ando S, Sartorius N, Lopez-Ibor JJ, Thornicroft G (2013) Global pattern of experienced and anticipated discrimination reported by people with major depressive disorder: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet 381(9860):55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61379-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Alonso J, Buron A, Bruffaerts R, He Y, Posada-Villa J, Lepine JP, Angermeyer MC, Levinson D, de Girolamo G, Tachimori H, Mneimneh ZN, Medina-Mora ME, Ormel J, Scott KM, Gureje O, Haro JM, Gluzman S, Lee S, Vilagut G, Kessler RC, Von Korff M, World Mental Health C (2008) Association of perceived stigma and mood and anxiety disorders: results from the World Mental Health Surveys. Acta Psychiatr Scand 118(4):305–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01241.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 8.Corker E, Hamilton S, Robinson E, Cotney J, Pinfold V, Rose D, Thornicroft G, Henderson C (2016) Viewpoint survey of mental health service users’ experiences of discrimination in England 2008-2014. Acta Psychiatr Scand 134(Suppl 446):6–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12610 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 11.Evans-Lacko S, Clement S, Corker E, Brohan E, Dockery L, Farrelly S, Hamilton S, Pinfold V, Rose D, Henderson C, Thornicroft G, McCrone P (2015) How much does mental health discrimination cost: valuing experienced discrimination in relation to healthcare care costs and community participation. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 24(5):423–434. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796014000377 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Kessler RC, Green JG, Gruber MJ, Sampson NA, Bromet E, Cuitan M, Furukawa TA, Gureje O, Hinkov H, Hu CY, Lara C, Lee S, Mneimneh Z, Myer L, Oakley-Browne M, Posada-Villa J, Sagar R, Viana MC, Zaslavsky AM (2010) Screening for serious mental illness in the general population with the K6 screening scale: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 19(Suppl 1):4–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.310 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 16.Summerfield M, Bevitt R, Freidin S, Hahn M, La N, Macalalad N, O’Shea M, Watson N, Wilkins R, Wooden M (2017) HILDA user manual—release 15. Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
- 17.Australian Government Department of Health (2017) Quarterly Medicare Statistics. Department of Health. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/Quarterly-Medicare-Statistics. Accessed 1 Nov 2018, 2019
- 18.Independent Hospital Pricing Authority (2017) National Hospital Cost Data Collection, public hospitals cost report, round 19 (financial year 2014–15). Independent Hospital Pricing Authority, SydneyGoogle Scholar
- 19.Australian Bureau of Statistics (2018) Australian Consumer price index: concepts, sources and methods, vol Catalogue No.: 6401.0. Australian Bureau of Statistics, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 21.Morgan AJ, Reavley NJ, Jorm AF, Beatson R (2017) Discrimination and support from friends and family members experienced by people with mental health problems: findings from an Australian national survey. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 52(11):1395–1403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-017-1391-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Reavley NJ, Morgan AJ, Jorm AF (2017) Predictors of experiences of discrimination and positive treatment in people with mental health problems: findings from an Australian national survey. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 52(3):269–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-016-1301-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar