Advertisement

The influence of parental offending on the continuity and discontinuity of children’s internalizing and externalizing difficulties from early to middle childhood

  • Tyson WhittenEmail author
  • Kristin R. Laurens
  • Stacy Tzoumakis
  • Sinali Kaggodaarachchi
  • Melissa J. Green
  • Felicity Harris
  • Vaughan J. Carr
  • Kimberlie Dean
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

Although parental criminal offending is a recognized risk factor for conduct problems among offspring, its impact on the continuity and discontinuity of children’s behavioural and emotional difficulties during the early development is less well known. We used data from a large, population-based record-linkage project to examine the relationship between parental offending and the continuity and discontinuity of children’s conduct, attentional, and emotional difficulties from early to middle childhood while also considering the role of timing of the parental offending exposure.

Method

Data for 19,208 children and their parents were drawn from the New South Wales Child Development Study. Multinomial regression analyses tested associations between mother’s and father’s history and timing of any and violent offending, and patterns of continuity or discontinuity in offspring emotional, conduct, and attentional difficulties between ages 5 and 11 years.

Results

Maternal and paternal offending each conferred a significantly increased risk of all the patterns of developmental difficulties, including those limited to age 5 only (remitting problems), to age 11 only (incident problems), and to difficulties present at both ages 5 and 11 years (persisting problems). Greatest odds were observed for persisting conduct problems. Paternal offending that continued through early and middle childhood had the greatest association with child difficulties, while the timing of maternal offending had a less prominent effect on child developmental difficulties.

Conclusion

Parental offending is a strong risk factor for early and pervasive behavioural and emotional problems in offspring, and may be a key indicator of high risk for later antisocial behaviour.

Keywords

Conduct problems Hyperactivity/inattention Emotional symptoms Parental offending Child development Record linkage 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the use of population data owned by the NSW Ministry of Health; NSW Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages; and the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research. This paper uses data from the Australian Early Development Census (AEDC). The AEDC is funded by the Australian Government Department of Education and Training. The findings and views reported are those of the author and should not be attributed to these Departments or the NSW and Australian Government. The record linkage was conducted by the Centre for Health and Record Linkage. This research was conducted by the University of New South Wales with the financial support from the Australian Research Council (Linkage Project LP110100150, with the NSW Ministry of Health, NSW Department of Education, and the NSW Department of Family and Community Services representing the Linkage Project Partners; and Discovery Project DP170101403); the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC Project Grants APP1058652 and APP1048055 and NHMRC Partnership Project 1138683); and the Australian Rotary Health (Mental Health of Young Australians Research Grants 104090 and 162302). KRL was supported by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT170100294).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

127_2019_1670_MOESM1_ESM.docx (28 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 27 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Beaver KM (2013) The familial concentration and transmission of crime. Crim Justice Behav 40:139–155.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812449405 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Besemer S, Ahmad SI, Hinshaw SP, Farrington DP (2017) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the intergenerational transmission of criminal behaviour. Aggress Viol Beh 37:161–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.10.004 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Frisell T, Lichtenstein P, Långström N (2010) Violent crime runs in families: a total population study of 12.5 million individuals. Psychol Med 41:97–105.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291710000462 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thornberry TP, Freeman-Gallant A, Lovegrove PJ (2009) Intergenerational linkages in antisocial behaviour. Crim Behav Ment Health 19:80–93.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.709 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vaughn MG, Salas-Wright CP, DeLisi M, Qian Z (2014) The antisocial family tree: family histories of behavior problems in antisocial personality in the United States. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 50:821–831.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-014-0987-9 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Raudino A, Fergusson DM, Woodward LJ, Horwood LJ (2013) The intergenerational transmission of conduct problems. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 48:465–476.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-012-0547-0 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marmorstein NR, Malone SM, Iacono WG (2004) Psychiatric disorders among offspring of depressed mothers: associations with paternal psychopathology. Am J Psychiatry 161:1588–1594.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.161.9.1588 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Latvala A, Kuja-Halkola R, Långström N, Lichtenstein P (2014) Paternal antisocial behavior and sons’ cognitive ability: a population-based quasiexperimental study. Psychol Sci 26. 78–88.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614555726 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Loeber R, Farrington DP (2000) Young children who commit crime: epidemiology, developmental origins, risk factors, early interventions, and policy implications. Dev Psychopathol 12:737–762.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400004107 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Erskine HE, Norman RE, Ferrari AJ, Chan GCK, Copeland WE, Whiteford HA, Scott JG (2016) Long-term outcomes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and conduct disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 55:841–850.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2016.06.016 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moffitt TE (2018) Male antisocial behaviour in adolescence and beyond. Nature Hum Behav 2:177–186.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0309-4 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Loeber R, Keenan K (1994) Interaction between conduct disorder and its comorbid conditions: effects of age and gender. Clin Psychol Rev 14:497–523.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(94)90015-9 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bor W, McGee TR, Fagan AA (2004) Early risk factors for adolescent antisocial behaviour: an Australian longitudinal study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 38, 365–372.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1614.2004.01365.x Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bornovalova MA, Hicks BM, Iacono WG, McGue M (2010) Familial transmission and heritability of childhood disruptive disorders. Am J Psychiatry 167:1066–1074.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091272 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ehrensaft MK, Wasserman GA, Verdelli L, Greenwald S, Miller LS, Davies M (2003) Maternal antisocial behavior, parenting practices, and behavior problems in boys at risk for antisocial behavior. J Child Fam Stud 12:27–40.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021302024583 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Laurens KR, Tzoumakis S, Kariuki M, Green MJ, Hamde M, Harris F, Dean K et al (2017) Pervasive influence of maternal and paternal criminal offending on early childhood development: a population data linkage study. Psychol Med 47:889–901.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716003007 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bell MF, Bayliss DM, Glauert R, Ohan JL (2018) Using linked data to investigate developmental vulnerabilities in children of convicted parents. Dev Psychol 54:1219–1231Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Herndon RW, Iacono WG (2005) Psychiatric disorder in the children of antisocial parents. Psychol Med 35:1815–1824.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291705005635 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jaffee SR, Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Taylor A (2003) Life with (or without) father: the benefits of living with two biological parents depend on the father’s antisocial behavior. Child Dev 74:109–126.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.t01-1-00524 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim H, Capaldi DM, Pears KC, Kerr DCR, Owen LD (2009) Intergenerational transmission of internalizing and externalizing behaviours across three generations; gender-specific pathways. Crim Behav Mental Health 19:125–141.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.708 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meurs I, Reef J, Verhulst FC, Ende J (2009) Intergenerational transmission of child problem behaviors: a longitudinal, population-based study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 48:138–145.  https://doi.org/10.1097/CHI.0b013e318191770d Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Petitclerc A, Boivin M, Dionne G, Zoccolillo M, Tremblay RE (2009) Disregard for rules: the early development and predictors of a specific dimension of disruptive behavior disorders. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 50:1477–1484.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02118.x Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tremblay RE, Nagin DS, Séguin JR, Zoccolillo M, Zelazo PD, Boivin M, Japel C et al (2004) Physical aggression during early childhood: trajectories and predictors. Pediatrics 114:e43–e50.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.114.1.e43 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Galéra C, Côté SM, Bouvard MP, Pingault J, Melchior M, Michel G, Tremblay RE et al (2011) Early risk factors for hyperactivity-impulsivity and inattention trajectories from age 17 months to 8 years. Arch Gen Psychiatry 68, 1267–1275.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.138 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Coley RL, Carrano J, Lewin-Bizan S (2011) Unpacking links between fathers’ antisocial behaviors and children’s behavior problems: direct, indirect, and interactive effects. J Abnorm Child Psychol 39:791–804.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-011-9496-4 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lizotte AJ, Phillips MD, Krohn MD, Thornberry TP, Bushway SD, Schmidt NM (2015) Like parent like child? The role of delayed childrearing in breaking the link between parent’s offending and their children’s antisocial behavior. Justice Q 32:410–444.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2013.771206 Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Besemer S (2014) The impact of timing and frequency of parental criminal behaviour and risk factors on offpsring offending. Psychol Crime Law 20:78–99.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2012.736512 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84:191–215.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tzoumakis S, Dean K, Green MJ, Zheng C, Kariuki M, Harris F, Laurens KR et al (2017) The impact of parental offending on offspring aggression in early childhood: a population-based record linkage study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 62:445–455.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-017-1347-3 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Carr VJ, Harris F, Raudino A, Luo L, Kariuki M, Liu E, Green MJ et al (2017) New South Wales child development study (NSW-CDS): an Australian multiagency, multigenerational, longitudinal record linkage study. BMJ Open 6:e009023.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009023 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Green M, Harris F, Laurens K, Kariuki M, Tzoumakis S, Dean K, Carr V et al (2018) Cohort profile: the New South Wales child development study (NSW-CDS)—wave 2 (child age 13 years). Int J Epidemiol 6:e009023.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyy115 Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brinkman SA, Gialamas A, Rahman A, Mittinty MN, Gregory TA, Silburn S, Lynch JW et al (2012) Jurisdictional socioeconomic and gender inequalities in child health and development: analysis of a national census of 5-year-olds in Australia. BMJ Open 2:e001075.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001075 Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Brinkman SA, Gregory TA, Goldfeld S, Lynch JW, Hardy M (2014) Data resource profile: the Australian Early Development Index (AEDI). Int J Epidemiol 43:1089–1096.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu085 Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Laurens KR, Tzoumakis S, Dean K, Brinkman SA, Bore M, Lenroot R, Green MJ et al (2017) The 2015 middle childhood survey (MCS) of mental health and well-being at age 11 years in an Australian population cohort. BMJ Open 7:e016244.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016244 Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Janus M, Offord DR (2007) Development and psychometric properties of the early development instrument (EDI): a measure of children’s school readiness. Can J Behav Sci 39:1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1037/cjbs2007001 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Brinkman SA, Silburn S, Lawrence D, Goldfeld S, Sayers M, Oberklaid F (2007) Investigating the validity of the australian early development index. Early Educ Dev 18:427–451.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280701610812 Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Janus M, Brinkman SA, Duku EK (2011) Validity and psychometric properties of the early development instrument in Canada, Australia, United States, and Jamaica. Soc Indic Res 103:283–297.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9846-1 Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Goodman R (2001) Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 40:1337–1345.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015 Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Goodman R (1997) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 38:581–586.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Goodman R, Meltzer H, Bailey V (2003) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. Int Rev Psychiatry 15:173–177.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0954026021000046137 Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hawes DJ, Dadds MR (2004) Australian data and psychometric properties of the strength and difficulties questionnaire. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 38:644–651.  https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1440-1614.2004.01427.x Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Duku EK, Janus M, Brinkman S (2015) Investigation of the cross-national equivalence of a measurement of early child development. Child Indic Res 8:471–489.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-014-9249-3 Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pink B (2013) Socio-economic indexes for areas (SEIFA) 2011. Technical paper (ed. Australian Bureau of Statistics). Commonwealth of Australia, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fogel CI (1995) Pregnant prisoners: impact of incarceration on health and health care. J Correct Health Care 2:169–190.  https://doi.org/10.1177/107834589500200205 Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Masho SW, Bishop DL, Keyser-Marcus L, Varner SB, White S, Svikis D (2013) Least explored factors associated with prenatal smoking. Matern Child Health J 17:1167–1174.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-1103-y Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Linnet KM, Dalsgaard S, Obel C, Wisborg K, Henriksen TB, Rodriguez A, Jarvelin M et al (2003) Maternal lifestyle factors in pregnancy risk of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and associated behaviors: review of the current evidence. Am J Psychiatry 106:1028–1040.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.160.6.1028 Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Williams JHG (2007) Consequences of prenatal toxin exposure for mental health in children and adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 16:243–253.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-006-0596-6 Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Beijers. R, Buitelaar JK, de Weerth C (2014) Mechanisms underlying the effects of prenatal psychosocial stress on child outcomes: beyond the HPA axis. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 23:943–956.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-014-0566-3 Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Tzoumakis S, Carr VJ, Dean K, Laurens KR, Kariuki M, Harris F, Green MJ (2018) Prenatal maternal smoking, maternal offending, and offspring behavioural and cognitive outcomes in early childhood. Crim Behav Ment Health 28:397–408.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.2089 Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Van de Rakt M, Nieuwbeerta P, De Graaf ND (2008) Like father, like son: the relationships between conviction trajectories of fathers and their sons and daughters. Br J Criminol 48:538–556.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azn014 Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    D’Onofrio BM, Slutske WS, Turkheimer E, Emery RE, Harden P, Martin NG et al (2007) Intergenerational transmission of childhood conduct problems: a children of twins study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 64:820–829.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.64.7.820 Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Rhule DM, McMahon RJ, Spieker SJ (2004) Relation of adolescent mothers’ history of antisocial behavior to child conduct problems and social competence. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 33:524–535.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3303_10 Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Salvatoer JE, Meyers JL, Yan J, Aliev F, Lansford JE, Dick DM et al (2015) Intergenerational continuity in parents’ and adolescents’ externalizing problems: The role of life events and their interaction with GABRA2. J Abnorm Psychol 124, 709–728.  https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000066 Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Carey G, Crammond B, Leeuw ED (2015) Towards health equity: a framework for the application of proportionate universalism. Int J Equity Health 14:81–90.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-015-0207-6 Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sanders MR, Markie-Dadds CM, Tully LA, Bor W (2000) The triple P-positive parenting program: a comparison of enhanced, standard, and self-directed behavioral family intervention for parents of children with early onset conduct problems. J Consult Clin Psychol 68:624–640.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.4.624 Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Olds DL (2006) The nurse-family partnership: an evidence-based preventive intervention. Infant Ment Health J 27:5–25.  https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.20077 Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Olds DL (2007) Preventing crime with prenatal and infancy support to parents: the nurse-family partnership. Victims Offenders 2:205–225.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15564880701263569 Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Achenbach TM (2011) Commentary: definitely more than measurement error: but how should we understand and deal with informant discrepencies? J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 41:80–86.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2011.533416 Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Alexander LA, McKnight PE, Disabato DJ, Kashdan TB (2017) When and how to use multiple informants to improve clinical assessments. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 39:669–679.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-017-9607-9 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tyson Whitten
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kristin R. Laurens
    • 1
    • 2
  • Stacy Tzoumakis
    • 3
  • Sinali Kaggodaarachchi
    • 1
  • Melissa J. Green
    • 1
    • 4
  • Felicity Harris
    • 1
  • Vaughan J. Carr
    • 1
    • 4
    • 5
  • Kimberlie Dean
    • 1
    • 6
  1. 1.School of PsychiatryUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.School of Psychology and Counselling, Institute of Health and Biomedical InnovationQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.School of Social SciencesUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  4. 4.Neuroscience Research AustraliaSydneyAustralia
  5. 5.Department of PsychiatryMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  6. 6.Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health NetworkMatravilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations