Race/ethnicity, nativity, and lifetime risk of mental disorders in US adults
There has been no comprehensive examination of how race/ethnicity and nativity intersect in explaining differences in lifetime prevalence of mental disorders among Asian, Black, Latino, and White adults. This study aims to estimate racial/ethnic differences in lifetime risk of mental disorders and examine how group differences vary by nativity.
Survival models were used to estimate racial/ethnic and nativity differences in lifetime risk of DSM-IV anxiety, mood, and substance use disorders in a nationally representative sample of over 20,000 respondents to four US surveys.
Asians had the lowest lifetime prevalence of mental disorders (23.5%), followed by Blacks (37.0%), Latinos (38.8%), and Whites (45.6%). Asians and Blacks had lower lifetime risk than Whites for all disorders even after adjusting for nativity; Latinos and Whites had similar risk after adjusting for nativity. Risk of disorder onset was lowest for foreign-born respondents in years before migration. There were significant race/ethnicity and nativity interactions for mood and substance use disorders. Odds of mood disorder onset were higher for Whites with at least one US-born parent. Odds of substance use disorder onset among Asians were higher for US-born respondents; for Latinos, they were higher for those with at least one US-born parent.
Parental foreign-born nativity is associated with a low risk of mental disorders, but not uniformly across racial/ethnic groups or disorders. Exposure to the US context may be associated with greater mental disorder risk for Latinos and Whites particularly. Investigations of cultural processes, including among Whites, are needed to understand group differences.
KeywordsMental health disparities Nativity Race/ethnicity Mental disorder prevalence
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01MD009719. Dr. Kiara Alvarez was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) under Award Number K23MH112841. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of Interest
In the past 3 years, Dr. Kessler received support for his epidemiological studies from Sanofi Aventis; was a consultant for Johnson & Johnson Wellness and Prevention, Shire, Takeda; and served on an advisory board for the Johnson & Johnson Services Inc. Lake Nona Life Project. Kessler is a co-owner of DataStat, Inc., a market research firm that carries out healthcare research. The other authors declare no competing interests.
- 1.Grant BF, Stinson FS, Hasin DS, Dawson DA, Chou SP, Anderson K (2004) Immigration and lifetime prevalence of DSM-IV psychiatric disorders among Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic Whites in the United States: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry 61(12):1226–1233PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Canino G, Alegria M (2009) Understanding psychopathology among the adult and child Latino population from the United States and Puerto Rico: An epidemiologic perspective. In: Villarruel F, Carlo G, Grau J, Azmitia M, Cabrera N, Chahin T (eds) Handbook of US latino psychology: developmental and community-based perspectives. SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, pp 31–44Google Scholar
- 10.Marks AK, Ejesi K, García Coll C (2014) Understanding the US immigrant paradox in childhood and adolescence. Child Dev Perspect 8(2):59–64Google Scholar
- 16.De La Rosa M (2002) Acculturation and Latino adolescents’ substance use: a research agenda for the future. Subst Use Misuse 37(4):429–456Google Scholar
- 24.Swendsen J, Conway KP, Degenhardt L, Glantz M, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Sampson N, Kessler RC (2010) Mental disorders as risk factors for substance use, abuse and dependence: results from the 10-year follow-up of the National Comorbidity Survey. Addiction 105(6):1117–1128PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 26.Pennell B-E, Bowers A, Carr D, Chardoul S, Cheung G-Q, Dinkelmann K, Gebler N, Hansen SE, Pennell S, Torres M (2004) The development and implementation of the National Comorbidity Survey Replication, the National Survey of American Life, and the National Latino and Asian American Survey. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 13(4):241–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.180 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Alegría M, Vila D, Woo M, Canino G, Takeuchi D, Vera M, Febo V, Guarnaccia P, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Shrout P (2004) Cultural relevance and equivalence in the NLAAS instrument: integrating etic and emic in the development of cross-cultural measures for a psychiatric epidemiology and services study of Latinos. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 13(4):270–288PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 29.World Health Organization (1992) The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 30.American Psychiatric Association (1994) DSM-IV: Diagnostic and statistic manual of mental disorders. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 32.First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JB (2002) Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR axis I disorders, research version, patient edition (SCID-I/NP). Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 33.US Census Bureau (2015) 2010 ANSI codes for county subdivisions. https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/codes/cousub.html. Accessed 2 Mar 2017
- 34.Rubin DB (1987) Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 35.Halli SS, Rao KV (2013) Advanced techniques of population analysis. Springer Science & Business Media, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 37.Raghunathan TE, Dong Q (2011) Analysis of variance from multiply imputed data sets. Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Retrieved from http://www-personal.umich.edu/~teraghu/Raghunathan-Dong.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2017
- 38.Wang B, Fang Y, Jin M (2014) Combining type-III analyses from multiple imputations. SAS Support Paper 1543-2014. Proceedings of the SAS Global Forum 2014 Conference. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. Retrieved from http://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings14/1543-2014.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2017
- 53.Vega WA, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Andrade L, Bijl R, Borges G, Caraveo-Anduaga JJ, DeWit DJ, Heeringa SG, Kessler RC, Kolody B (2002) Prevalence and age of onset for drug use in seven international sites: results from the international consortium of psychiatric epidemiology. Drug Alcohol Depend 68(3):285–297PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 54.Demyttenaere K, Bruffaerts R, Posada-Villa J, Gasquet I, Kovess V, Lepine J, Angermeyer M, Bernert Sd, De Girolamo G, Morosini P (2004) Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. JAMA 291(21):2581–2590PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 56.Hornsey MJ, Bain PG, Harris EA, Lebedeva N, Kashima ES, Guan Y, González R, Chen SX, Blumen S (2018) How much is enough in a perfect world? Cultural variation in ideal levels of happiness, pleasure, freedom, health, self-esteem, longevity, and intelligence. Psychol Sci 29(9):1393–1404PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 62.Lewis T (2013) Analyzing continuous variables from complex survey data using PROC SURVEYFREQ, Paper AA-10-2013. Paper presented at the Midwest SAS Users Group (MWSUG) Conference. Columbus, OH, September 22–24. Retrieved from https://www.mwsug.org/proceedings/2013/AA/MWSUG-2013-AA10.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2017
- 63.Berglund P (2010) An introduction to multiple imputation of complex sample data using SAS® v9.2. SAS Support Paper 265-2010. Proceedings of the SAS Global Forum 2010 Conference. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. Retrieved from http://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings10/265-2010.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2017