Positive and negative impacts of schizophrenia on family caregivers: a systematic review and qualitative meta-summary
Schizophrenia places a heavy burden on the individual with the disorder, as well as on his or her family; this burden continues over the long course of the disease. This study aimed to provide an overview of the positive and negative impacts of schizophrenia on family caregivers.
From April to June 2017, two investigators conducted a systematic review and meta-summary of studies obtained from five electronic databases and the footnotes and citations of eligible studies. Qualitative studies that explored the experiences of family caregivers of individuals with schizophrenia were included. Study findings published between 1993 and 2017 were extracted and synthesised using narrative and summative approaches.
After the removal of duplicates, independent reviewers screened 864 records. Subsequently, 46 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and 23 papers were included in the synthesis. Negative impacts identified were traumatic experiences, loss of expectation of life and health, lack of personal and social resources, uncertainty and unpredictability, family disruption, conflict in interpersonal relationships, difficulty in understanding, and stigma and heredity. Meanwhile, the positive impacts identified were family solidarity, admiration, affirmation, affection, compassion, learning knowledge and skills, self-confidence, personal growth, and appreciation.
Analysis of the studies suggested that family members of individuals with schizophrenia face a series of traumatic situations during the course of the illness. Their subsequent experiences can be conceptualised as a continuous circle of caregiving, in which the positive impacts can be centrally positioned within the negative impacts.
KeywordsQualitative synthesis Caregiving process Caregiver burden Caregiver benefits Mandala
We thank Prof. Tatsuo Akechi, chairman of the Department of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, who provided comments that contributed to the revision of the manuscript draft. No financial support was obtained from any source for this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
We declare no competing interests.
- 1.Vos T, Barber RM, Bell B, Bertozzi-Villa A, Biryukov S, Bolliger I, Charlson F, Davis A, Degenhardt L, Dicker D, Duan L, Erskine H, Feigin VL, Ferrari AJ, Fitzmaurice C, Fleming T, Graetz N, Guinovart C, Haagsma J, Hansen GM, Hanson SW, Heuton KR, Higashi H, Kassebaum N, Kyu H, Laurie E, Liang X, Lofgren K, Lozano R, MacIntyre MF, Moradi-Lakeh M, Naghavi M, Nguyen G, Odell S, Ortblad K, Roberts DA, Roth GA, Sandar L, Serina PT, Stanaway JD, Steiner C, Thomas B, Vollset SE, Whiteford H, Wolock TM, Ye P, Zhou M, Avila MA, Aasvang GM, Abbafati C, Ozgoren AA, Abd-Allah F, Aziz MIA, Abera SF, Aboyans V, Abraham JP, Abraham B, Abubakar I, Abu-Raddad LJ, Abu-Rmeileh NME, Aburto TC, Achoki T, Ackerman IN, Adelekan A, Ademi Z, Adou AK, Adsuar JC, Arnlov J, Agardh EE, Al Khabouri MJ, Alam SS, Alasfoor D, Albittar MI, Alegretti MA, Aleman AV, Alemu ZA, Alfonso-Cristancho R, Alhabib S, Ali R, Alla F, Allebeck P, Allen PJ, AlMazroa MA, Alsharif U, Alvarez E, Alvis-Guzman N, Ameli O, Amini H, Ammar W, Anderson BO, Anderson HR, Antonio CAT, Anwari P, Apfel H, Arsenijevic VSA, Artaman A, Asghar RJ, Assadi R, Atkins LS, Atkinson C, Global Burden Dis S, Global Burden of Disease Study C, Avdelningen för p, Fakulteten för h, Mittuniversitetet (2015) Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 386(9995):743–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60692-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Harrison G, Hopper K, Craig T, Laska E, Siegel C, Wanderling J, Dube KC, Ganev K, Giel R, an der Heiden W, Holmberg SK, Janca A, Lee PW, Leon CA, Malhotra S, Marsella AJ, Nakane Y, Sartorius N, Shen Y, Skoda C, Thara R, Tsirkin SJ, Varma VK, Walsh D, Wiersma D (2001) Recovery from psychotic illness: a 15- and 25-year international follow-up study. Br J Psychiatry 178:506–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Sandelowski M, Barroso J (2007) Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 22.Li JJ (2015) Top drugs: history, pharmacology, syntheses, 1st edn. OUP USA, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 24.Checklist for Qualitative Research (2016) The Joanna Briggs Institute. https://joannabriggs.org/research/critical-appraisal-tools.html. Accessed 13 Jul 2017
- 25.Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual (2014) The Joanna Briggs Institute http://joannabriggs.org/sumari.html. Accessed 14 Jul 2017
- 26.Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Arai L, Rodgers M, Britten N, Roen K, Duffy S (2006) Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: a product from the ESRC methods programme. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1018.4643
- 38.Mhaule VN, Ntswane-Lebang MA (2009) Experiences of caregivers of individuals suffering from schizophrenia in rural areas of the mpumalanga province of South Africa. Afr J Nurs Midwifery 11(1):118–136Google Scholar
- 48.Gater A, Rofail D, Tolley C, Marshall C, Abetz-Webb L, Zarit SH, Berardo CG (2014) “Sometimes it’s difficult to have a normal life”: results from a qualitative study exploring caregiver burden in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res Treat 2014:368215. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/368215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 63.Jung M (2000) Lives of two Korean mothers of children with schizophrenia: an interpretive approach. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc 6(3):87–92Google Scholar
- 68.Outram S, Harris G, Kelly B, Bylund CL, Cohen M, Landa Y, Levin T, Sandhu H, Vamos M, Loughland C (2015) ‘We didn’t have a clue’: family caregivers’ experiences of the communication of a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Int J Soc Psychiatry 61(1):10–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764014535751 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 70.Poonnotok P, Thampanichawat W, Patoomwan A, Sangon S (2016) Struggling to restore normalcy: Thai parents’ experiences in being caregivers of children with early schizophrenia. Pac Rim Int J Nurs Res 20(1):71–84Google Scholar
- 75.Jansen JE, Lysaker PH, Harder S, Haahr UH, Lyse HG, Pedersen MB, Trauelsen AM, Simonsen E (2014) Positive and negative caregiver experiences in first-episode psychosis: emotional overinvolvement, wellbeing and metacognition. Psychol Psychother Theory Res Pract 87(3):298–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 78.Goncalves-Pereira M, Xavier M, van Wijngaarden B, Papoila AL, Schene AH, Caldas-de-Almeida JM (2013) Impact of psychosis on Portuguese caregivers: a cross-cultural exploration of burden, distress, positive aspects and clinical-functional correlates. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 48(2):325–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-012-0516-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 80.Hanzawa S, Bae JK, Bae YJ, Chae MH, Tanaka H, Nakane H, Ohta Y, Zhao X, Iizuka H, Nakane Y (2013) Psychological impact on caregivers traumatized by the violent behavior of a family member with schizophrenia. Asian J Psychiatr 6(1):46–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2012.08.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 83.Koschorke M, Padmavati R, Kumar S, Cohen A, Weiss HA, Chatterjee S, Pereira J, Naik S, John S, Dabholkar H, Balaji M, Chavan A, Varghese M, Thara R, Thornicroft G, Patel V (2014) Experiences of stigma and discrimination of people with schizophrenia in India. Soc Sci Med 123:149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.035 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar