The study of effect moderation in youth suicide-prevention studies
Suicide is now the second leading cause of death among persons between the ages of adolescents and emerging adults and rates have increased despite more funding and broader implementation of youth suicide-prevention programs. A systematic review was conducted focusing on identifying youth suicide-prevention studies within the United States. This paper reports on the methods utilized for understanding possible moderators of suicide-prevention program outcomes.
We searched six databases from 1990 through August 2017 to identify studies of suicide-preventive interventions among those under age 26 years. Two independent team members screened search results and sequentially extracted information related to statistical methods of moderation analyses.
69 articles were included in the systematic review of which only 17 (24.6%) explored treatment effect heterogeneity using moderation analysis. The most commonly used analytic tool was regression with an interaction term. The moderators studied included demographic characteristics such as gender and ethnicity as well as individual characteristics such as traumatic stress exposure and multiple prior suicide attempts.
With a greater emphasis from the federal government and funding agencies on precision prevention, understanding which prevention programs work for specific subgroups is essential. Only a small percentage of the reviewed articles assessed moderation effects. This is a substantial research gap driven by sample size or other limitations which have impeded the identification of intervention effect heterogeneity.
KeywordsSuicide prevention Moderation methods Systematic review
This project was funded under Contract no. HHSA29020150000XI Task Order 290-2012-00007-I from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The authors of this manuscript are responsible for its content. Statements in the manuscript do not necessarily represent the official views of or imply endorsement by AHRQ or HHS. This topic a Pathways to Prevention Project and was nominated by the Office of Disease Prevention of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and selected by AHRQ for systematic review by an EPC. A representative from AHRQ served as a Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative and provide technical assistance during the conduct of the full-evidence report and provided comments on draft versions of the full-evidence report. AHRQ did not directly participate in the literature search, determination of study eligibility criteria, data analysis or interpretation, or preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript for publication.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Prevention C for DC (2015) Web-based injury statistics query and reporting system (WISQARS). http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/. Accessed 14 Jul 2015
- 2.National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention, R. T. F. (2014) A prioritized research agenda for suicide prevention: an action plan to save lives. National Institute of Mental Health and the Research Prioritization Task Force, RockvilleGoogle Scholar
- 3.Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Pathophysiology and Prevention of Adolescent and Adult Suicide; Goldsmith SK, Pellmar TC, Kleinman AM, Bunney WE (eds) (2002) Reducing suicide: a national imperative. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 4.Belsky J (1997) Theory testing, effect-size evaluation, and differential susceptibility to rearing influence: the case of mothering and attachment author(s): Jay Belsky Published by: Wiley on behalf of the Society for Research in Child Development Stable. Child Dev 68:598–600CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Wilcox H, Wissow L, Kharrazi H, Wilson R, Musci R, Zhang A, et al (2016) Data linkage strategies to advance youth suicide prevention. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment no. 222. (Prepared by the Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center under contract no. 290-2012-00007-I.) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, RockvilleGoogle Scholar
- 14.Curry J, Silva S, Rohde P et al (2011) Recovery and recurrence following treatment for adolescent major depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 68:263–270. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.150 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.King CA, Hill RM, Wynne HA et al (2012) Adolescent suicide risk screening: the effect of communication about type of follow-up on adolescents’ screening responses adolescent suicide risk screening : the effect of communication about type of follow-up on adolescents’ screening responses. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 41:508–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2012.680188 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 17.Shamseddeen W, Clarke G, Wagner KD, Ryan ND, Birmaher B, Emslie G, Asarnow JR, Porta G, Mayes T, Keller MB, Brent DA (2011) Treatment-resistant depressed youth show a higher response rate if treatment ends during summer school break. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 50:1140–1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2011.07.022 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 20.Creed T, Gillham JE, Diamond G et al (2012) Sexual trauma history does not moderate treatment outcome in attachment-based family therapy (ABFT) for adolescents with suicide ideation sexual trauma history does not moderate treatment outcome in attachment-based family therapy (ABFT) for adolescen. J Fam Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028414 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Huey SJ, Henggeler SW, Rowland MD (2004) Multisystemic therapy effects on attempted suicide by youths presenting psychiatric emergencies. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.chi.0000101700.15837.f3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Gould MS, Greenberg TED, Velting DM, Shaffer D (2003) Youth suicide risk and preventive interventions: a review of the past 10 years. J Am Acad Chld Adolesc Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CHI.0000046821.95464.CF CrossRefGoogle Scholar