Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

, Volume 53, Issue 9, pp 987–1001 | Cite as

Fiscal crises and personal troubles: the great recession in Ireland and family processes

  • Richard Layte
  • Cathal McCrory
Original Paper



Social disadvantage is often associated with worse child psychological adjustment which itself is implicated in educational failure and poor adult social position. The family stress model holds that the association between social disadvantage and psychological adjustment stems from the impact of economic pressure on parental mental health mediated through the parent/child relationship.


We take advantage of a natural experiment offered by the ‘great recession’ in Ireland between 2008 and 2012. Structural equation models using causal modelling and Longitudinal data from the Growing Up in Ireland cohort study are used to test whether the experience of recession in families impacts on children’s psychological adjustment and whether this occurs directly or is mediated by the processes identified in the family stress model.


More than 70% of families experienced a reduction in income between 2008 and 2011 and 26% reported cutting back on basics such as clothing and food. Family experience of recession was significantly associated with negative change in all of the components of the family stress model, particularly parental mental health. However, less than half of the effect of recession was mediated by the processes of the family stress model. Tests showed that a model with a direct effect of recession on child psychological adjustment provided a better fit to the data.


Recession and economic pressure had a significant effect on child psychological adjustment, but only a minority of this effect was indirect via the mental health of parents and parent/child relationship. The family stress model only offers a partial account of the mechanisms through which economic hardship impacts on families and children.


Children Health selection Economic recession Psychological adjustment 



This work was supported by the Lifepath Project, which is funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (grant 633666).

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethics statement

The study received ethical approval from the Research Ethics Committee of the Office for the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs in Ireland and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.


  1. 1.
    Breen R (2004) Social mobility in Europe. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blandon J, Machin S (2008) Up and down the generational income ladder in Britain: past changes and future prospects national. Inst Econ Rev 205(1):15Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Case A, Fertig A, Paxson C (2005) The lasting impact of childhood health and circumstance. J Health Econ 24:365–389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Palloni A, Milesi C, Turner A (2009) Early childhood health, reproduction of economic inequalities and the persistence of health and mortality differentials. Soc Sci Med 68(9):1574–1582CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen E (2004) Why socioeconomic status affects the health of children. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 13(3):4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Strachan D, Sheikh A (2004) A life course approach to respiratory and allergic diseases. In: Kuh D, Ben-Shlomo Y (eds) A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Haas SA (2006) Health selection and the process of social stratification: the effect of childhood health on socioeconomic attainment. J Health Soc Behav 47(4):339–354CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fowler MG, Johnson MP, Atkinson SS (1985) School achievement and absence in children with chronic health conditions. J Pediatr 106(4):683–687CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Palloni A, Milesi C (2006) Economic achievement, inequalities and health disparities: the intervening role of early health status. Res Soc Stratif Mobil 24:21–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lundberg O (1991) Childhood living conditions, health status and social mobility: a contribution to the health selection debate. Eur Sociol Rev 7:149–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Layte R, McCrory C (2012) Paediatric chronic illness and educational failure: the role of emotional and behavioural problems. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Flouri E, Midouhas E (2017) Environmental adversity and children’s early trajectories of problem behavior: the role of harsh parental discipline. J Fam Psychol 31(2):10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Callahan KL, Scaramella LV, Laird RD, Sohr-Preston SL (2011) Neighborhood disadvantage as a moderator of the association between harsh parenting and toddler-aged children’s internalizing and externalizing problems. J Fam Psychol 25:9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deater-Deckard K, Ivy L, Petrill SA (2006) Maternal warmth moderates the link between physical punishment and child externalizing problems: a parent-offspring behavior genetic analysis. Parent Sci Pract 6:19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dearing E (2004) The developmental implications of restrictive and supportive parenting across neighborhoods and ethnicities: exceptions are the rule. J Appl Dev Psychol 25:21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kohn ML (1963) Social class and parent-child relationships: an interpretation. Am J Sociol 68(4):9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chan TW, Koo A (2011) Parenting style and youth outcomes in the UK. Eur Sociol Rev 27(3):14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Conger RD, Conger KJ (2002) Resilience in Midwestern families: selected findings from the first decade of a prospective longitudinal study. J Marriage Fam 64:12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brody GH, Stoneman Z, Flor D, McCrary C, Hastings L, Conyers O (1994) Financial resources, parent psychological functioning, parent co-caregiving, and early adolescent competence in rural two-parent African-American families. Child Dev 65:15Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cohan CL, Bradbury TN (1997) Negative life stress, marital interaction, and the longitudinal course of newlywed marriage. J Pers Soc Psychol 73:14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Conger RD, Conger KJ, Elder GHJ, Lorenz FO, Simons RL, Whitbeck LB (1992) A family process model of economic hardship and adjustment of early adolescent boys. Child Dev 63:15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Conger RD, Elder GHJ (1994) Families in troubled times: adapting to change in rural America. Aldine De Gruyter, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Solantaus T, Leinonen J, Punamaki RL (2004) Children’s mental health in times of economic recession: replication and extension of the family economic stress model in Finland. Dev Psychol 40(3):17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Carlo G, Padilla-Walker LM, Day RD (2011) A test of the economic strain model on adolescents’ prosocial behaviors. J Res Adolesc 21(4):7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Leininger LJ, Kalil A (2014) Economic strain and children’s behavior in the aftermath of the great recession. J Marriage Fam 76:13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schneider W, Waldfogel J, Brooks-Gunn J (2015) The great recession and behavior problems in 9-year old children. Dev Psychol 51(11):15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Thornton M, Williams J, McCrory C, Murray A, Quail A (2010) Design, Instrumentation and Procedures for the Child Cohort (at 9 years). Technical Report Series. Department of Children and Youth Affairs, DublinGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Goodman R, Scott S (1999) Comparing the strengths and difficulties questionnaire and the child behavior checklist: is small beautiful? J Abnorm Child Psychol 27:17–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Goodman R (1997) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 38:581–586CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mathai J, Anderson P, Bourne A (2003) Use of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire as an outcome measure in a child and adolescent mental health service. Australas Psychiatry 11:4Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Melchior LA, Huba GJ, Brown VB, Reback CJ (1993) A short depression index for women. Educ Psychol Meas 53:9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pianta RC (1992) Beyond the parent: the role of other adults in children’s lives. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sharpley CF, Rogers HJ (1984) Preliminary validation of the Abbreviated Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale: some psychometric data regarding a screening test of marital adjustment. Educ Psychol Meas 44(4):5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Spanier GB (1976) Measuring dyadic adjustment: new scales for assessing quality of marriage and similar dyads. J Marriage Fam 38(1):14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sabourin S, Valois P, Lussier Y (2005) Development and validation of a brief version of the dyadic adjustment scale with a nonparametric item analysis model. Psychol Assess 17(1):13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Allison PD (1990) Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociol Methodol 20:21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rosenbaum P, Ruben D (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70:14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Clark AE (2003) Unemployment as a social norm: psychological evidence from panel data. J Labor Econ 21(2):19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Layte R (2017) Why do working-class kids do worse in school? an empirical test of two theories of educational disadvantage. Eur Sociol Rev 33(4):489–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cunha F, Heckman JJ (2008) Formulating, identifying and estimating the technology of cognitive and non-cognitive skill formation. J Hum Resour 43(4):45Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Campbell F, Conti G, Heckman JJ (2014) Early childhood investments substantially boost adult health. Science 343(6178):8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyTrinity College DublinDublin 2Ireland
  2. 2.Department of Medical GerontologyMercer’s Institute for Successful Ageing (MISA)DublinIreland

Personalised recommendations