Advertisement

Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 161–169 | Cite as

Decisional conflict in mental health care: a cross-sectional study

  • Margot J. MetzEmail author
  • Marjolein A. Veerbeek
  • Christina M. van der Feltz-Cornelis
  • Edwin de Beurs
  • Aartjan T. F. Beekman
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

Decisional conflict refers to the degree to which patients are engaged in and feel comfortable about important clinical decisions. Until now, the concept has received little attention in mental health care. We investigate the level of decisional conflict in mental health care and whether this is influenced by socio-demographics, treatment setting, diagnoses, and locus of control.

Methods

Cross-sectional study among 186 patients in Dutch specialist mental health care using the Decisional Conflict Scale, which measures five dimensions of decisional conflict: information, support, clarification of values, certainty, and decisional quality. Descriptive statistics and forward stepwise linear regression analyses were used.

Results

Patients report relatively high levels of decisional conflict, especially those with more external locus of control. Having a personality disorder and higher education also increases decisional conflict on the dimensions support and clarification of values, respectively. Less decisional conflict was experienced by patients with psychotic disorders on the dimension certainty and by women on the information domain.

Conclusions

Decisional conflict is common among patients in specialist mental health care and is very useful for assessing the quality of clinical decision making. Measuring decisional conflict and knowledge about influencing factors can be used to improve patients’ participation in clinical decision making, adherence to treatment and clinical outcomes.

Keyword

Decisional conflict Decisional Conflict Scale Shared decision making Cross-sectional study Mental health care 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the colleagues of the department of data management and research of GGZ inGeest for their support in the data collection. We also thank the participating patients and organisations for their contribution to the study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

This study was supported by the National Network for Quality Development in mental health care (Grant number PV140003).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    NANDA (1990) Taxonomy I-revised. MO author, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    LeBlanc A, Kenny DA, O’Connor AM, Légaré F (2009) Decisional conflict in patients and their physicians: a dyadic approach to shared decision making. Med Decis Mak 29:61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    O’Connor AM (1993, updated 2010) User-manual-decisional conflict scale (16 item statement format). Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User_Manuals/UM_decisional_conflict.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2015
  4. 4.
    Légaré F, LeBlanc A, Robitaille H, Turcotte S (2012) The decisional conflict scale: moving from the individual to the dyad level. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundheitswes 106:247–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Song MK, Sereika SM (2006) An evaluation of the decisional conflict scale for measuring the quality of end-of-life decision making. Patient Educ Couns 61:397–407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hölzel P, Kriston L, Härter M (2013) Patient preference for involvement, experienced involvement, decisional conflict, and satisfaction with physician: a structural equation model test. BMC Health Serv Res 13:231–310CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sepucha KR, Borkhoff DM, Lally J, Levin CA, Matlock DD, Ng CJ, Ropka ME, Stacey D, Joseph-Williams N, Wills CE, Thomson R (2013) Establishing the effectiveness of patient decision aids: key constructs and measurement instruments. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 13:S12–S111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stacey D, Légare F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L (2017) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Becerra-Perez MM, Menear M, Turcotte S, Labrecque M, Légaré F (2016) More primary care patients regret health decisions if they experienced decisional conflict in the consultation: a secondary analysis of a multicenter descriptive study. BMC Fam Pract 17:156–211CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Coylewright M, Branda M, Inselman JW, Shah N, Hess E, LeBlanc A, Montori V, Ting HH (2014) Impact of socio-demographic patient characteristics on the efficacy of decision aids. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 7:360–368CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Westermann GMA, Verheij F, Winkens BJ, Verhulst FC, Van Oort FVA (2013) Structured shared decision-making using dialogue and visualization: a randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns 90:74–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.09.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elwyn G, Forsch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P (2012) Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med 27:1361–1367CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Patel SR (2008) Recent advances in shared decision making for mental health. Curr Opin Psychiatry 21:606–607CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barr PJ, Scholl I, Bravo P, Faber MJ, Elwyn G, McAllister M (2015) Assessment of patient empowerment-a systematic review of measures. PLoS One.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126553 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Härter M, Elwyn G, van der Weijden T (2011) Policy and practice developments in the implementation of shared decision making: an international perspective. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundheitswes 105:229–325.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    ten Haaft G, van Veenendaal H (2016) Versnellen van gedeelde besluitvorming in Nederland: opmaat naar een onderzoeks-/innovatieprogramma Samen beslissen [Increasing Shared Decision Making in the Netherlands], ZonMw, CZ. https://www.zonmw.nl/nl/actueel/nieuws/detail/item/versnellen-van-gedeelde-besluitvorming-in-nederland/. Accessed April 2016
  17. 17.
    Pieterse A, Brand P, Basoski N, Stiggelbout A (2017) Een investering van arts en patiënt in betere zorg: Alles wat u moet weten over gedeelde besluitvorming [An investment of clinician and patient in quality of health care: everything you need to know about shared decision making]. Med Contact 12:34–43Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Légaré F, O’Connor AM, Graham ID, Wells GA, Tremblay S (2006) Impact of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework on the agreement and difference between patients’ and physicians’ decisional conflict. Med Decis Mak 26:373–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    des Cormiers A, Légaré F, Simard S, Boulet LP (2015) Decisional conflict in asthma patients: a cross sectional study. J Asthma 52:1084–1088CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thompson-Leduc P, Turcotte S, Labrecque M, Légaré F (2016) Prevalence of clinically significant decisional conflict: an analysis of five studies on decision-making in primary care. BMJ Open.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011490 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hickman RL, Daly BJ. Lee E (2012) Decisional conflict and regret: consequences of surrogate decision making for the chronically critically ill. Appl Nurs Res 25:271–275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Katapodi MC, Munro ML, Pierce PF, Williams RA (2011) Testing of the decisional conflict scale: genetic testing hereditary breast, ovarian cancer. Nurs Res 60:368–410CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Knops AM, Goossens A, Ubbink DT, Legemate DA, Stalpers LJ, Bosssuyt PM (2013) Interpreting patient decisional conflict scores: behaviour and emotions in decisions about treatment. Med Decis Mak 33(1):78–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sun Q (2005) Predicting downstream effects of high decisional conflict: meta-analyses of the decisional conflict scale. University of Ottawa.  https://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-18514
  25. 25.
    Eliacin J, Salyers MP, Kukla M, Matthias MS (2015) Factors influencing patients’ preferences and perceived involvement in shared decision-making in mental health care. J Mental Health 24:24–25.  https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2014.953695 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Eliacin J, Salyers MP, Kukla M, Matthias MS (2015) Patients’ understanding of shared decision making in a mental health setting. Qual Health Res 25:668–711.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314551060 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Randenborgh A, Jong de-Meyer R, J. Hüffmeier J (2010) Decision making in depression: differences in decisional conflict between healthy and depressed individuals. Clin Psychol Psychother 17:285–314PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sim JA, Shin JS, Park SM, Chang YJ, Shin A, Noh DY, Han W, Yang HK, Lee HJ, Kim YW, Kim YT, Jeong SY, Yoon JH, Kim YJ, Heo DS, Kim TY, Oh DY, Wu HG, Kim HJ, Chie EK, Kang KW, Yun YH (2015) Association between information provision and decisional conflict in cancer patients. Ann Oncol 26:1974–1977CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Underhill ML, Hong F, Berry DL (2014) When study site contributes to outcomes in a multi-center randomized trial: a secondary analysis of decisional conflict in men with localized prostate cancer. Health Qual of Life Outcomes 12:159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dillon EC, Stults C, Wilson C, Chuang J, Meehan A, Li M, Elwyn G, Frosch DL, Yu E, Tai-Seale M (2017) An evaluation of two interventions to enhance patient-physician communication using the observer OPTION measure of shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns 100:1910–1918.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.04.020 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Metz MJ, Franx GC, Veerbeek MA, de Beurs de E, van der Feltz van der-Cornelis CM, Beekman ATF (2015) Shared decision making in mental health care using routine outcome monitoring as a source of information: a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 15:313–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    O’Connor AM (1995) Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Mak 15:25–26Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Westermann GMA (2010) Ouders adviseren in de jeugd-ggz. Het ontwerp van een gestructureerd adviesgesprek. Maastricht: Datawyse/Universitaire Pers. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/22397/. Accessed 10 Feb 2015
  34. 34.
    American Psychiatric Association (APA) (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th edn, text rev.). DC Author, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pearlin LI, Lieberman MA (1981) The stress process. J Health Soc Behav 22:337–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GGz BreburgTilburgThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Trimbos InstituteUtrechtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.VU UniversityAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Tilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Foundation for Benchmarking Mental Health CareBilthovenThe Netherlands
  6. 6.University of LeidenLeidenThe Netherlands
  7. 7.GGZ inGeestAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  8. 8.VU University Medical Centre AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations