Decisional conflict in mental health care: a cross-sectional study
- 374 Downloads
Decisional conflict refers to the degree to which patients are engaged in and feel comfortable about important clinical decisions. Until now, the concept has received little attention in mental health care. We investigate the level of decisional conflict in mental health care and whether this is influenced by socio-demographics, treatment setting, diagnoses, and locus of control.
Cross-sectional study among 186 patients in Dutch specialist mental health care using the Decisional Conflict Scale, which measures five dimensions of decisional conflict: information, support, clarification of values, certainty, and decisional quality. Descriptive statistics and forward stepwise linear regression analyses were used.
Patients report relatively high levels of decisional conflict, especially those with more external locus of control. Having a personality disorder and higher education also increases decisional conflict on the dimensions support and clarification of values, respectively. Less decisional conflict was experienced by patients with psychotic disorders on the dimension certainty and by women on the information domain.
Decisional conflict is common among patients in specialist mental health care and is very useful for assessing the quality of clinical decision making. Measuring decisional conflict and knowledge about influencing factors can be used to improve patients’ participation in clinical decision making, adherence to treatment and clinical outcomes.
KeywordDecisional conflict Decisional Conflict Scale Shared decision making Cross-sectional study Mental health care
The authors would like to thank the colleagues of the department of data management and research of GGZ inGeest for their support in the data collection. We also thank the participating patients and organisations for their contribution to the study.
Compliance with ethical standards
This study was supported by the National Network for Quality Development in mental health care (Grant number PV140003).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.NANDA (1990) Taxonomy I-revised. MO author, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
- 3.O’Connor AM (1993, updated 2010) User-manual-decisional conflict scale (16 item statement format). Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User_Manuals/UM_decisional_conflict.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2015
- 7.Sepucha KR, Borkhoff DM, Lally J, Levin CA, Matlock DD, Ng CJ, Ropka ME, Stacey D, Joseph-Williams N, Wills CE, Thomson R (2013) Establishing the effectiveness of patient decision aids: key constructs and measurement instruments. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 13:S12–S111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 8.Stacey D, Légare F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L (2017) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5 Google Scholar
- 9.Becerra-Perez MM, Menear M, Turcotte S, Labrecque M, Légaré F (2016) More primary care patients regret health decisions if they experienced decisional conflict in the consultation: a secondary analysis of a multicenter descriptive study. BMC Fam Pract 17:156–211CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 16.ten Haaft G, van Veenendaal H (2016) Versnellen van gedeelde besluitvorming in Nederland: opmaat naar een onderzoeks-/innovatieprogramma Samen beslissen [Increasing Shared Decision Making in the Netherlands], ZonMw, CZ. https://www.zonmw.nl/nl/actueel/nieuws/detail/item/versnellen-van-gedeelde-besluitvorming-in-nederland/. Accessed April 2016
- 17.Pieterse A, Brand P, Basoski N, Stiggelbout A (2017) Een investering van arts en patiënt in betere zorg: Alles wat u moet weten over gedeelde besluitvorming [An investment of clinician and patient in quality of health care: everything you need to know about shared decision making]. Med Contact 12:34–43Google Scholar
- 24.Sun Q (2005) Predicting downstream effects of high decisional conflict: meta-analyses of the decisional conflict scale. University of Ottawa. https://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-18514
- 28.Sim JA, Shin JS, Park SM, Chang YJ, Shin A, Noh DY, Han W, Yang HK, Lee HJ, Kim YW, Kim YT, Jeong SY, Yoon JH, Kim YJ, Heo DS, Kim TY, Oh DY, Wu HG, Kim HJ, Chie EK, Kang KW, Yun YH (2015) Association between information provision and decisional conflict in cancer patients. Ann Oncol 26:1974–1977CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Dillon EC, Stults C, Wilson C, Chuang J, Meehan A, Li M, Elwyn G, Frosch DL, Yu E, Tai-Seale M (2017) An evaluation of two interventions to enhance patient-physician communication using the observer OPTION measure of shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns 100:1910–1918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.04.020 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.O’Connor AM (1995) Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Mak 15:25–26Google Scholar
- 33.Westermann GMA (2010) Ouders adviseren in de jeugd-ggz. Het ontwerp van een gestructureerd adviesgesprek. Maastricht: Datawyse/Universitaire Pers. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/22397/. Accessed 10 Feb 2015
- 34.American Psychiatric Association (APA) (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th edn, text rev.). DC Author, WashingtonGoogle Scholar