Does social support modify the effect of disability acquisition on mental health? A longitudinal study of Australian adults
Disability acquisition in adulthood is associated with deterioration in mental health. Social support may act as a “buffer” against poor mental health following disability acquisition. We tested the hypothesis that women and men with low social support experienced larger declines in mental health on acquisition of a disability compared to women and men with high social support.
We assessed whether social support, measured both prior and subsequent to disability acquisition, modified the association between disability acquisition and mental health using 14 annual waves of data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey. Participants reported at least two consecutive waves of disability preceded by at least two consecutive waves without disability (2200 participants, 15,724 observations). Fixed-effects linear regression models were used to estimate average differences in mental health between waves with and without disability, for women and men separately. We tested for effect measure modification of the association by social support, including a three-way interaction between disability and social support prior and subsequent to disability acquisition.
Though the effects of disability acquisition on mental health were much larger for women, for both women and men there was a consistent pattern of association with social support. There was evidence that social support modified the association between disability acquisition and mental health, with the largest effects for those experiencing a change from high to low social support subsequent to disability and for people with consistently low social support.
These findings highlight the importance of developing new policy and practice strategies to improve the mental health of people with disabilities, including interventions to promote social support at the time of disability acquisition.
KeywordsDisability Mental health Social support Social epidemiology Longitudinal
Compliance with ethical standards
This work was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship and a National Health and Medical Research Council Postgraduate Scholarship (1093740) to ZA, an Australian Research Council Linkage Grant (LP100200545) with the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation (VicHealth) as a funding partner, centre Grant funding from VicHealth (#15732), and Fellowship funding from the (Australian) Society for Mental Health Research.
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- 1.ABS (2004) Disability, ageing and carers: summary of findings, 2003 (4430.0). ABSGoogle Scholar
- 2.World Health Organization and World Bank Group (2011) World report on disability. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 8.World Health Organization (2001) International classification of functioning, disability and health. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 9.Madden RH, Dune T, Lukersmith S, Hartley S, Kuipers P, Gargett A, Llewellyn G (2014) The relevance of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in monitoring and evaluating Community-based Rehabilitation (CBR). Disabil Rehabil 36:826–837CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Antonucci TC (1993) A life-span view of women’s social relations. In: Turner BF, Troll LE (eds) Women growing older: a psychological perspective. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 26.Summerfield M, Freidin S, Hahn M et al (2014) HILDA user manual-release 13. Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
- 27.Watson N, Wooden M (2012) The HILDA Survey: a case study in the design and development of a successful household panel study. Longitud Life Course Stud 3:369–381Google Scholar
- 30.World Health Organization (2002) Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF the international classification of functioning, disability and health. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 34.Watson N (2004) Income and wealth imputation for waves 1 and 2 Melbourne. Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
- 35.Haagenars A, de Vos K, Zaidi A (1994) Poverty statistics in the late 1980s: research based on micro-data. Off Off Publ Eur Commun, LuxemburgGoogle Scholar
- 36.ABS (2013) Household income and income distribution, Australia, 2011–12 (6523.0). ABSGoogle Scholar
- 38.StataCorp (2011) Stata statistical software: release 12. StataCorp LP, College StationGoogle Scholar
- 42.Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Gandek B (2000) SF-36 health survey: manual & interpretation guide. QualityMetric, LincolnGoogle Scholar
- 43.ABS (2013) Disability, ageing and carers: summary of findings, 2012 (4430.0). ABSGoogle Scholar