What does dependency on community mental health services mean? A conceptual review with a systematic search
- 615 Downloads
Although community mental health services aim to support patients’ autonomy and independence, they have repeatedly been criticised for making patients dependent. Yet, it remains often unclear what exactly is meant with dependency in this context. This review aimed to identify the meaning of the term dependency on community services in the literature.
A systematic search and conceptual review of papers where dependency is used in the context of community mental health services. Narrative synthesis was used to identify thematic concepts linked to dependency in these settings.
Fifteen papers met the inclusion criteria. The analysis identified five different concepts of dependency on community mental health services: dislocation from the outside world; inflexibility and lack of freedom; obligation as resentment or appreciation; living with or without meaningful activities; and security.
The findings suggest that, distinct from the exclusively negative connotation of the term dependency in a conventional medical context, dependency on community mental health services contains both negative and positive aspects. The different aspects might guide the future evaluation of the care provided in such services.
KeywordsDependency Community mental health services Mental disorder Deinstitutionalisation Review
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
No funding was sought for this review.
- 1.World Health Organization (2003) Mental health policy and service guidance package: mental health contextGoogle Scholar
- 2.Goffman E (1961) Asylums: essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Anchor Books, Garden CityGoogle Scholar
- 6.World Health Organization. (2003). Mental health policy and service guidance package: organization of services for mental healthGoogle Scholar
- 11.Nelson G, Laurier W (2010) Housing for people with serious mental illness: Approaches, evidence, and transformative change. J Soc Soc Welfare 37:123–146 ISSN: 01915096 Google Scholar
- 15.Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A et al (2006) Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. ESRC methods programme report (unpublished report). University of Lancaster, Lancaster. doi: 10.13140/2.1.1018.4643Google Scholar
- 24.Parks SH, Pilisuk M (1984) Personal support systems of former mental patients residing in board-and-care facilities. J Community Psychol 12(3):230–244. doi: 10.1002/1520-6629(198407)12:3<230:AID-JCOP2290120307>3.0.CO;2-B PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Kvale S, Brinkman S (2009) The qualitative research interview. Studentlitteratur, LundGoogle Scholar
- 32.Morse JM (1994) Critical issues in qualitative research methods. SAGE Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 33.Krueger R, Casey MA (2000) Focus groups, 3rd edn. SAGE Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 34.Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of qualitative results: grounded theory procedures and techniques. SAGE Publications, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
- 38.Janca A, Lee A (2002) Continuity of life interview manual. The University of Western Australia, PerthGoogle Scholar
- 42.Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 43.Glaser BH (1978) Theoretical sensitivity. Sociology Press, Mill ValleyGoogle Scholar
- 44.Glaser BH (1992) Basics of grounded theory analysis. Sociology Press, Mill ValleyGoogle Scholar
- 46.Stern PN (1985) Using grounded theory in nursing research. In: Leininger MM (ed) Qualitative research methods in nursing. Grune & Stratton, New York, pp 149–160Google Scholar
- 47.Mitchell C (1969) The concept and use of social networks. In: Mitchell J (ed) Social networks in urban situations. University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
- 49.Wellman B (1980) A guide to network analysis (working paper series no. I). Department of Sociology, University of Toronto, TorontoGoogle Scholar
- 50.Mishler E (1986) Research interviewing. Context and narrative. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 53.Spradley JP (1979) The ethnographic interview. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, BelmontGoogle Scholar
- 54.Spradley JP (1980) Participant observation. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, BelmontGoogle Scholar
- 55.Ricoeur P (1973) Filosofiens kilder (the fountain of philosophy). Vintens Forlag A/S, Copenhagen (in Danish) Google Scholar
- 56.Ricoeur P (1976) Interpretation theory: discourse and the surplus of meaning. Texas Christian University Press, Fort WorthGoogle Scholar
- 57.Giorgi A (2009) The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology. Duquesne University Press, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
- 58.Brinkmann S, Kvale S (2009) Interviews. Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. SAGE Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 59.Boyatzis RE (1998) Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. SAGE Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 60.Flick U (2002) An introduction to qualitative research. SAGE Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 61.Moos RH (1974) Community-oriented programs environment manual. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
- 63.The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (1993) volume I. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar