Informal coercion in psychiatry: a focus group study of attitudes and experiences of mental health professionals in ten countries
- 1k Downloads
Whilst formal coercion in psychiatry is regulated by legislation, other interventions that are often referred to as informal coercion are less regulated. It remains unclear to what extent these interventions are, and how they are used, in mental healthcare. This paper aims to identify the attitudes and experiences of mental health professionals towards the use of informal coercion across countries with differing sociocultural contexts.
Focus groups with mental health professionals were conducted in ten countries with different sociocultural contexts (Canada, Chile, Croatia, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Norway, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom).
Five common themes were identified: (a) a belief that informal coercion is effective; (b) an often uncomfortable feeling using it; (c) an explicit as well as (d) implicit dissonance between attitudes and practice—with wider use of informal coercion than is thought right in theory; (e) a link to principles of paternalism and responsibility versus respect for the patient’s autonomy.
A disapproval of informal coercion in theory is often overridden in practice. This dissonance occurs across different sociocultural contexts, tends to make professionals feel uneasy, and requires more debate and guidance.
KeywordsAutonomy Ethics International comparison Paternalism Sociocultural context
Conflict of interest
- 3.Beauchamp TL, Childress J (1979) Principles of biomedical ethics, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 14.Kisely SR, Campbell LA, Preston NJ (2011) Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, Issue 3. Art No.: CD004408. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004408.pub3
- 16.Lidz CW (1998) Coercion in psychiatric care: what have we learned from research? J Am ACAD Psychiatry 26:631–637Google Scholar
- 18.Mendez J (2013) Report of the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. United Nations: Human Rights Council, 22nd session. Available at http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G13/105/77/PDF/G1310577.pdf?OpenElement. Accessed 01 Aug 2014
- 24.Okasha A (2000) The impact of Arab culture on psychiatric ethics. In: Okasha A, Arboleda-Florez J, Sartorius N (eds) Ethics, culture and psychiatry: international perspectives. American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC, pp 15–28Google Scholar
- 26.Onwuegbuzie AJ, Dickinson WB, Leech NL, Zoran AG (2009) A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research. Int J Qual Methods 8:1–21Google Scholar
- 27.Priebe S, Katsakou C, Glöckner M, Dembinskas A, Fiorillo A, Karastergiou A, Kiejna A, Kjellin L, Nawka P, Schuetzwohl M, Solomon Z, Torres-Gonzalez F, Wang D, Kallert T (2010) Patients’ views of involuntary hospital admission after 1 and 3 months: prospective study in 11 European countries. Br J Psychiatry 196:179–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Szasz T (2007) Coercion as cure: a critical history of psychiatry. Transaction Publishers, BrunswickGoogle Scholar