Psychological distress in torture survivors: pre- and post-migration risk factors in a US sample
- 808 Downloads
To investigate the relationships between sociodemographic, pre- and post-migration variables with prevalence of psychological distress and global functioning in a heterogeneous sample of torture survivors.
Clients referred from resettlement agencies via the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) to a community clinic in the United States (N = 278) were interviewed with structured, translated questionnaires. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses determined the associations of sociodemographic, pre-, and post-migration risk factors with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety, and global functioning.
Regression data indicate that length of time between arrival in US and clinical services was significantly associated with PTSD and depression; participants receiving services after 1 year of resettlement were more likely to experience PTSD (adjusted OR = 3.29) and depression (adjusted OR = 4.50) than participants receiving services within 1 year. Anxiety was predicted by female gender (adjusted OR = 3.43), age over 40 years (adjusted OR = 3.12), Muslim religion (adjusted OR = 2.64), and receiving medical services (AOR 3.1). Severely impaired global functioning was associated with female gender (adjusted OR = 2.75) and unstable housing status (adjusted OR = 2.21).
Findings highlight the importance of examining post-migration variables such as length of time in country prior to receiving services in addition to pre-migration torture history upon relocated torture survivors. Clinicians and policy-makers should be aware of the importance of early mental health screening and intervention on reducing the psychiatric burden associated with torture and forced relocation.
KeywordsRefugee Mental health Health services Asylum Trauma
This project was supported by a grant from the Stanford Office of Community Health. We also wish to express our appreciation to James Livingston, PhD, Sarita Kohli, LMFT and Armina Husic for their support, and to the clinicians of the Center for Survivors of Torture who are dedicated to serving this community. We also thank all of the participants who made this research possible.
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- 1.Convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, GA res. 39/46, Annex, 10 Dec. 1984Google Scholar
- 2.United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (2012) A year of crises: UNHCR global trends 2011. Accessible at: http://www.unhcr.org/4fd6f87f9.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2014
- 12.Steel Z, Chey T, Silove D, Marnane C, Bryant RA, van Ommeren M (2009) Association of torture and other potentially traumatic events with mental health outcomes among populations exposed to mass conflict and displacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 302(5):537–549CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Weine SM, Henderson SW (2005) Rethinking the role of posttraumatic stress disorder in refugee mental health services. In: Corales TA (ed) Trends in posttraumatic stress disorder research. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppaguge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 16.Quiroga B (2004) Health challenges of refugees and immigrants. Refugee Reports 25(2)Google Scholar
- 29.Almedom AM, Tumwine JK (2008) Resilience to disasters: a paradigm shift from vulnerability to strength. Af Health Sci 8(2):1–4Google Scholar
- 30.Weathers FW, Litz B, Herman D, Huska J, Keane T (1993) The PTSD Checklist (PCL): Reliability, validity, and diagnostic utility. In: Paper presented at the 9th annual conference of the ISTSS, San Antonio, TXGoogle Scholar
- 33.American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th edition, text rev.) p 34, Washington, DC: Author. Available at https://www.msu.edu/course/sw/840/stocks/pack/axisv.pdf. Accessed on 25 June 2014