Relationship between family quality of life and day occupations of young people with Down syndrome
- 1.6k Downloads
To explore relationships between family quality of life, day occupations and activities of daily living (ADL) of young persons with Down syndrome.
Data were collected from 150 families with a young person with Down syndrome aged 16–30 years participating in the Down syndrome “Needs Opinions Wishes” database. Data described the young person’s characteristics (including functional abilities, behaviour and day occupations) and family characteristics (including income, family and community supports and quality of life).
Compared to families of young people attending open employment, families of young people participating in sheltered employment tended to report poorer family quality of life, after adjusting for personal characteristics, behaviour and income (coeff −6.78, 95 % CI −14.38, 0.81). Family supports reduced this relationship (coeff −6.00, 95 % CI −12.76, 0.76). Families of young people with greater functioning in ADL reported better family quality of life regardless of personal and environmental factors (coeff 0.45, 95 % CI 0.05, 0.85) and inclusion of family factors such as family supports reduced this association (coeff 0.29, 95 % CI −0.10, 0.67).
Participation of young people with Down syndrome in open employment may positively influence family quality of life. Services that facilitate functioning in ADL and assist the families in accessing suitable family supports have the potential to positively influence family quality of life.
KeywordsIntellectual disability Participation Employment Quality of life
We thank the families for their participation and the Disability Services Commission of WA for facilitating the distribution of questionnaires. We also gratefully acknowledge the initial seed funding from Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth and the ongoing funding provided by the Australian Research Council. #LP0989847 for the project ‘Leaving School: Maximising participation and life outcomes in youth with an intellectual disability transitioning from secondary school to adult life’. We would also like to acknowledge all our industry partners: Down syndrome WA, Disability Services Commission and Department of Education WA and the contributing investigators on the grant: Carol Bower, Bruce Tonge, Vivienne Riches and Nicholas de Klerk.
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Women’s and Children’s Health Services in Western Australia.
- 1.Turnball A, Turnball R, Erwin E, Soodak L (2006) Families, professionals, and exceptionality: positive outcomes through partnerships and trust, 5th edn. Merrill/Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
- 2.Parish SL, Pomeranz A, Hemp R, Rizzola MC, Braddock D (2001) Family support for persons with developmental disabilities in the US: status and trends (Policy Research Brief). University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration, Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
- 12.Hanley-Maxwell C, Whitney-Thomas J, Pogoloff S (1995) The second shock: a qualitative study of parents perspectives and needs during their child’s transition from school to adult life. J Assoc Pers Sev Handicaps 20:3–15Google Scholar
- 17.Tuckerman P, Cain P, Long B, Klarkowski J (2012) An exploration of trends in open employment in Australia since 1986. J Vocat Rehabil 37:173–183Google Scholar
- 22.Timmons JC, Whitney-Thomas J, McIntyre JP, Butterworth J, Allen D (2004) Managing service delivery systems and the role of parents during their children’s transitions. J Rehabil 70(2):19–26Google Scholar
- 24.Dyke P, Bourke J, Llewellyn G, Leonard H The experiences of parents and youth with an intellectual disability transitioning from secondary school to adult life. J Intellect Dev Disabil (in press)Google Scholar
- 29.Beach Center on Disability (2003) Family quality of life scale. University of Kansas, LawrenceGoogle Scholar
- 35.McConkey R, Mezza F (2001) Employment aspirations of people with learning disabilities attending day centres. J Learn Disabil 5(4):309–318Google Scholar
- 38.Mohr C, Tonge BJ, Einfeld SL, Taffe J (2011) The developmental behaviour checklist for adults (DBC-A) revised. University of Sydney and Monash University, SydneyGoogle Scholar
- 39.Dunst CJ, Trivette CM, Jenkins V (1988) Family Needs Scale. In: Dunst CJ, Trivette CM, Deal A (eds) Enabling and empowering families: principles and guidelines for practice. Brookine Books, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 40.Dunst CJ, Jenkins V, Trivette CM (1984) Family support scale: reliability and validity. J Individ Fam Community Wellness 1:45–52Google Scholar
- 41.Tuckerman P, Cain P, Long B, Klarkowski J (Under Review) An exploration of trends in open employment in Australia since 1986. J Vocat RehabilGoogle Scholar
- 42.Eggleton I, Robertson S, Ryan J, Kober R (1999) The impact of employment on the quality of life of people with an intellectual disability. J Vocat Rehabil 13:95–107Google Scholar
- 43.Schalock RL, Borthwick-Duffy A, Bradley V, Buntinx WHE, Coulter DL, Craig EM, Gomez SC, Lachapelle Y, Luckasson RA, Reeve A, Shogren KA, Snell ME, Spreat S, Tasse MJ, Thompson JR, Verdugo-Alonso MA, Wehmeyer ML, Yeager MH (2010) Intellectual disability: definition, classification, and systems of supports, 11th edn. AAIDD, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 49.Parmenter T (2011) Promoting training and employment opportunities for people with intellectual disabilities: international experience. Employment sector: employment working paper No. 103. International Labour Office, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 52.McCubbin MA, McCubbin HI (1993) Families coping with illness: the resilience model of family stress, adjustment and adaptation. In: Danielson C, Hamell-Bissell P, Winstead-Fry P (eds) Family, health and illness: perspectives on coping and intervention. Mosby, St Loius, pp 21–63Google Scholar