Gender differences in association between psychological distress and detailed living arrangements among Japanese older adults, aged 65–74 years
- 290 Downloads
Past studies have shown that living alone is detrimental to older adults’ mental health. However, there has been little focus on how older adults’ psychological distress differed by more detailed living arrangement, as well as by gender. The present study investigates various living arrangements in association with psychological distress among older men and women.
Data from community-dwelling Japanese older adults were collected through a mail survey (n = 1,807, aged 65–74 years, 51.5 % men). Psychological distress level was measured using Kessler’s six-item psychological distress scale. Living arrangements were categorized into four groups; “living with spouse only”, “living with spouse and other family”, “living with other family without spouse” or “living alone”. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to examine the associations of living arrangements with psychological distress level.
Older adults living alone were observed to have higher psychological distress. In addition, gender-stratified analyses showed that higher distress levels were observed among older men living with family, but without a spouse (OR: 2.85, 95 % CI: 1.51–5.39). In contrast, higher distress was observed among older women living with spouse and other family (OR: 1.53, 95 % CI: 1.03–2.28).
Psychological distress in older Japanese adults was associated with living arrangements, but such associations differed by gender. The association of living with a spouse on older men’s mental health was striking, while living with any family was found to be rather important for older women, aged 65–74 years.
KeywordsPopulation-based survey Older adults K6 Psychological distress Living arrangement
This study was supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C): 20500604 from the Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports and Science and Technology. All authors have no other conflicts of interest, including related directorship, stock holdings or contracts.
- 1.Jeste DV, Alexopoulos GS, Bartels SJ, Cummings JL, Gallo JJ, Gottlieb GL, Halpain MC, Palmer BW, Patterson TL, Reynolds CF 3rd, Lebowitz BD (1999) Consensus statement on the upcoming crisis in geriatric mental health: research agenda for the next 2 decades. Arch Gen Psychiatry 56(9):848–853PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.The Ministry of Health L, and Welfare of Japan (2010) The patient survey 2010Google Scholar
- 6.Larsen TK, Melle I, Auestad B, Haahr U, Joa I, Johannessen JO, Opjordsmoen S, Rund BR, Rossberg JI, Simonsen E, Vaglum P, Friis S, McGlashan T (2011) Early detection of psychosis: positive effects on 5-year outcome. Psychol Med 41(7):1461–1469. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710002023 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Inoue S, Ohya Y, Odagiri Y, Takamiya T, Kamada M, Okada S, Oka K, Kitabatake Y, Nakaya T, Sallis JF, Shimomitsu T (2011) Perceived neighborhood environment and walking for specific purposes among elderly Japanese. J Epidemiol 21(6):481–490 pii JST.JSTAGE/jea/JE20110044PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Gill SC, Butterworth P, Rodgers B, Mackinnon A (2007) Validity of the mental health component scale of the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (MCS-12) as measure of common mental disorders in the general population. Psychiatry Res 152(1):63–71. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.11.005 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Furukawa T, Kawakami N, Saitoh M, Ono Y, Nakane Y, Nakamura Y, Tachimori H, Iwata N, Uda H, Nakane H, Watanabe M, Naganuma Y, Hata Y, Kobayashi M, Miyake Y, Takeshima T, Kikkawa T (2008) The performance of the Japanese version of the K6 and K10 in the world mental health survey Japan. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 17(3):152–158. doi: 10.1002/mpr.257 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Tokuda Y, Okubo T, Ohde S, Jacobs J, Takahashi O, Omata F, Yanai H, Hinohara S, Fukui T (2009) Assessing items on the SF-8 Japanese version for health-related quality of life: a psychometric analysis based on the nominal categories model of item response theory. Value Health 12(4):568–573. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00449.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Murase N, Katsumura T, Ueda C, Inoue S, Shimomitsu T (2002) Validity and reliability of Japanese version of International Physical Activity Questionnaire. J Health Welf Stat 49(11):1–9Google Scholar
- 28.Nelson ME, Rejeski WJ, Blair SN, Duncan PW, Judge JO, King AC, Macera CA, Castaneda-Sceppa C (2007) Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendation from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation 116(9):1094–1105. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.185650 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Veiel HOF, Baumann UE (eds) (1992) The meaning and measurement of social support. Hemisphere Publishing CorpGoogle Scholar
- 33.Koizumi Y, Awata S, Kuriyama S, Ohmori K, Hozawa A, Seki T, Matsuoka H, Tsuji I (2005) Association between social support and depression status in the elderly: results of a 1-year community-based prospective cohort study in Japan. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 59(5):563–569. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2005.01415.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.The Gender Equality Bureau Cabinet Office of Japan (2012) Whitepaper of Gender Equality Bureau Cabinet Office. Shobi printing, JapanGoogle Scholar
- 38.Kadokawa S (2009) Examining the introduction of grandparenting classes for child-care support (in Japanese). Maternal Health 50(2):300–309Google Scholar