Advertisement

Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 327–335 | Cite as

Occupational functioning and work impairment in association with personality disorder trait-scores

  • Michael P. Hengartner
  • Mario Müller
  • Stephanie Rodgers
  • Wulf Rössler
  • Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

According to the DSM, functional impairment is a main criterion for the general definition of personality disorders (PDs), but research suggests that some PDs might not be related to impaired functioning. Occupational functioning has rarely been examined in all ten DSM PDs.

Methods

We analysed 511 adults aged 20–41 years from the general population of the canton of Zurich, Switzerland, using data from the Epidemiology Survey of the Zurich Programme for Sustainable Development of Mental Health Services. All PDs were assessed with dimensional trait-scores and associations with indicators of occupational functioning were analysed with generalised linear models.

Results

Each PD revealed at least a weak association with some form of occupational impairment. Most PDs, especially from cluster A and B, were significantly related to occupational dysfunction, in particular low education level, conflicts in the workplace, dismissal or demotion, and unemployment. In contrast, obsessive–compulsive PD was mostly unrelated to occupational functioning. A total personality pathology dose–response relationship was observed for low education level, conflicts in the workplace, dismissal or demotion, and unemployment.

Conclusions

Impairment in occupational functioning is an important aspect particularly of cluster A and B PDs. Assuming that functional impairment is a predictor of illness severity, we advocate that clinicians should carefully explore indicators of occupational functioning in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of PDs. The findings discussed herein have implications for general treatment, interventions in the work environment, or re-integration of patients into the labour force.

Keywords

Functional impairment Occupation Education Work Epidemiology Personality disorder 

Notes

Acknowledgments

ZInEP was supported by a private donation. The donor had no further role in the experimental design, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, the writing of this report, or the decision to submit this paper for publication.

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders DSM-5. American Psychiatric Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders DSM-IV-TR. American Psychiatric Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hengartner MP, Müller M, Rodgers S, Rössler W, Ajdacic-Gross V (2013) Interpersonal functioning deficits in association with DSM-IV personality disorder dimensions. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. doi: 10.1007/s00127-013-0707-x Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coid J, Yang M, Tyrer P, Roberts A, Ullrich S (2006) Prevalence and correlates of personality disorder in Great Britain. Br J Psychiatry 188:423–431PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johnson JG, First MB, Cohen P, Skodol AE, Kasen S, Brook JS (2005) Adverse outcomes associated with personality disorder not otherwise specified in a community sample. Am J Psychiatry 162:1926–1932PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oltmanns TF, Melley AH, Turkheimer E (2002) Impaired social functioning and symptoms of personality disorders assessed by peer and self-report in a nonclinical population. J Pers Disord 16:437–452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Torgersen S, Kringlen E, Cramer V (2001) The prevalence of personality disorders in a community sample. Arch Gen Psychiatry 58:590–596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crawford MJ, Koldobsky N, Mulder R, Tyrer P (2011) Classifying personality disorder according to severity. J Pers Disord 25:321–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cramer V, Torgersen S, Kringlen E (2006) Personality disorders and quality of life. A population study. Compr Psychiatry 47:178–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Skodol AE, Gunderson JG, McGlashan TH, Dyck IR, Stout RL, Bender DS, Grilo CM et al (2002) Functional impairment in patients with schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, or obsessive-compulsive personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry 159:276–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hardt J, Egle UT, Kappis B, Hessel A, Brähler E (2004) Symptom Checklist SCL-27: results of a representative German survey. Psychother Psych Med 54:214–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Angst J, Gamma A, Neuenschwander M, Ajdacic-Gross V, Eich D, Rössler W, Merikangas KR (2005) Prevalence of mental disorders in the Zurich cohort study: a twenty year prospective study. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 14:68–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dunn G, Pickles A, Tansella M, Vazquez-Barquero JL (1999) Two-phase epidemiological surveys in psychiatric research. Br J Psychiatry 174:95–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schotte CKW, de Doncker D (1994) ADP-IV Questionnaire. University Hospital Antwerp, AntwerpGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Doering S, Renn D, Hofer S, Rumpold G, Smrekar U, Janecke N, Schatz DS et al (2007) Validation of the German version of the assessment of DSM-IV personality disorders (ADP-IV) questionnaire. Z Psychosom Med Psychother 53:111–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schotte CKW, de Doncker D, Vankerckhoven C, Vertommen H, Cosyns P (1998) Self-report assessment of the DSM-IV personality disorders. Measurement of trait and distress characteristics: the ADP-IV. Psychol Med 28:1179–1188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schotte CKW, de Doncker DA, Dmitruk D, Van Mulders I, D’Haenen H, Cosyns P (2004) The ADP-IV questionnaire: differential validity and concordance with the semi-structured interview. J Pers Disord 18:405–419PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schafer JL, Graham JW (2002) Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods 7:147–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hengartner MP, Ajdacic-Gross V, Rodgers S, Müller M, Rössler W (2013) Childhood adversity in association with personality disorder dimensions: new findings in an old debate. Eur Psychiatry. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2013.04.004 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hengartner MP, Müller M, Rodgers S, Rössler W, Ajdacic-Gross V (2013) Can protective factors moderate the detrimental effects of child maltreatment on personality functioning? J Psychiatr Res. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.05.005 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Davidson G, Devaney J, Spratt T (2010) The impact of adversity in childhood on outcomes in adulthood: research lessons and limitations. J Soc Work 10:369–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gilbert R, Widom CS, Browne K, Fergusson D, Webb E, Janson S (2009) Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries. Lancet 373:68–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Haigler ED, Widiger TA (2001) Experimental manipulation of NEO-PI-R items. J Pers Assess 77:339–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Samuel DB, Widiger TA (2010) A comparison of obsessive-compulsive personality disorder scales. J Pers Assess 92:232–240PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barrick MR, Mount MK, Judge TA (2001) Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: what do we know and where do we go next? Int J Select Assess 9:9–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Busato VV, Prins FJ, Elshout JJ, Hamaker C (2000) Intellectual ability, learning style, personality, achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education. Pers Individ Dif 29:1057–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    De Fruyt F, Mervielde I (1998) Personality and interests as predictors of educational streaming and achievement. Eur J Pers 10:405–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Widiger TA, Simonsen E, Krueger R, Livesley WJ, Verheul R (2005) Personality disorder research agenda for the DSM-V. J Pers Disord 19:315–338PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Saulsman LM, Page AC (2004) The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: a meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev 23:1055–1085PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Judge TA, Ilies R (2002) Relationship of personality to performance motivation: a meta-analytic review. J Appl Psychol 87:797–807PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Michon HW, ten Have M, Kroon H, van Weeghel J, de Graaf R, Schene AH (2008) Mental disorders and personality traits as determinants of impaired work functioning. Psychol Med 38:1627–1637PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Goodwin RD, Hoven CW, Lyons JS, Stein MB (2002) Mental health service utilization in the United States. The role of personality factors. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 37:561–566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    ten Have M, Oldehinkel A, Vollebergh W, Ormel J (2005) Does neuroticism explain variations in care service use for mental health problems in the general population? Results from the Netherlands mental health survey and incidence study (NEMESIS). Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 40:425–431PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bassett SS, Chase GA, Folstein MF, Regier DA (1998) Disability and psychiatric disorders in an urban community: measurement, prevalence and outcomes. Psychol Med 28:509–517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    ten Have H, Vollebergh W, Bijl R, Ormel J (2002) Combined effect of mental disorder and low social support on care service use for mental health problems in the Dutch general population. Psychol Med 32:311–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tyrer P (2008) Personality disorder and public mental health. Clin Med 8:423–427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Miller JD, Pilkonis PA, Mulvey EP (2006) Treatment utilization and satisfaction: examining the contributions of axis II psychopathology and the five-factor model of personality. J Pers Disord 20:369–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rymaszewska J, Jarosz-Nowak J, Kiejna A, Kallert T, Schutzwohl M, Priebe S, Wright D et al (2007) Social disability in different mental disorders. Eur Psychiatry 22:160–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Skodol AE, Pagano ME, Bender DS, Shea MT, Gunderson JG, Yen S, Stout RL et al (2005) Stability of functional impairment in patients with schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, or obsessive-compulsive personality disorder over two years. Psychol Med 35:443–451PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael P. Hengartner
    • 1
  • Mario Müller
    • 1
  • Stephanie Rodgers
    • 1
  • Wulf Rössler
    • 1
    • 2
  • Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and PsychosomaticsUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Collegium Helveticum, a Joint Research Institute between the University of Zurich and the Swiss Federal Institute of TechnologyZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations