Advertisement

Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 267–273 | Cite as

Community treatment orders: the experiences of Non-Maori and Maori within mainstream and Maori mental health services

  • Giles Newton-HowesEmail author
  • Cameron J. Lacey
  • Doug Banks
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

Community treatment orders (CTOs) are sometimes used to coerce patients into treatment on the basis that such treatment is in their best interest. The experiences of Maori, New Zealand’s indigenous ethnic minority are less well known and this paper compares the views of Maori and non-Maori about CTOs.

Methods

Patients with experience of CTOs for greater than 6 months participated. Self-report measures were used to identify patients’ views of compulsory treatment. Demographic data, heath service characteristics, the experience of coercion, views of compulsory community treatment, satisfaction with care, social functioning, and psychopathology were assessed.

Results

There were few differences in demographic or clinical characteristics between Maori and non-Maori. There were no differences in the views of Maori compared to non-Maori patients with respect to compulsory community treatment. There were no differences in the views of Maori cared for by mainstream compared to culturally specialist Maori mental health service.

Conclusions

In a well-established system of compulsory treatment, there is no evidence of greater negative impact of CTOs in an indigenous minority population. The opportunity for Maori to self-select between mainstream and specialist Maori mental health services may minimize the negative aspects of compulsory community treatment for Maori.

Keywords

Community treatment orders Community mental health Ethics Psychiatry and law Maori health 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Assistance with initial data management was provided by Dr. James Stanley, Wellington School of Medicine, Otago University. Development of the initial data collection tools and the methodology was provided by WIT and Te Taiwhenua O Heretaunga. Te Taiwhenua O Heretaunga, assisted with data collection, has reviewed this paper and is happy for it being submitted for publication. Funding for the collection of the data was provided by the Hawke’s Bay Medical Research Fund.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Mental Health (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act. (1992). Available at http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1992/0046/latest/DLM262176.html
  2. 2.
    Okai D, Owen G, McGuire H, Singh S, Churchill R, Hotopf M (2007) Mental capacity in psychiatric patients. Systematic review. Br J Psychiatry 191:291–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Callaghan S, Ryan C (2012) Rising to the human rights challenge in compulsory treatment: new approaches to mental health law in Australia. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 46(7):11–20Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gray J, McSherry B, O’Reilly R, Weller P (2010) Australian and Canadian mental health acts compared. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 44(12):1126–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Newton-Howes G, Mullen R (2011) Coercion in psychiatric care: systematic review of correlated and themes. Psychiatr Serv 62:465–470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kisley S, Campbell L, Preston N (2005) Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3, Art No CD004408. doi:  10.1002/14651858.CD004408.pub2
  7. 7.
    Newton-Howes G (2012) A factor analysis of patients’ views of compulsory community treatment orders: the factors associated with detention. Psychiatry, Philosophy and Law Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13218719.2012.715827
  8. 8.
    Ministry of Health (2012) Office of the Director of Mental Health: Annual Report 2012. Ministry of Health, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Burns T, Rugkåsa J, Molodynski A, Dawson J, Yeeles K, Vazquez-Montes M, Priebe S (2013) Community treatment orders for patients with psychosis (OCTET): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 381(9878):1627–1633PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Birley J (2000) Political abuse of psychiatry. Acta Psychiatr Scand 101:13–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fulford KW, Smirnov AY, Snow E (1993) Concepts of disease and the abuse of psychiatry in the USSR. Br J Psychiatry 162:801–810PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. (2007) Available at: http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf
  13. 13.
    Johnstone K, Read J (2000) Psychiatrists’ recommendations for improving bicultural training and Maori mental health services: a New Zealand survey. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 34:135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kumar S, Ng B, Simpson A, Fisher J, Robinson E (2008) No evidence for restrictive care practices in Maori admitted to a New Zealand psychiatric inpatient unit: do specialist cultural teams have a role? Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 43:387–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harris R, Tobias M, Jeffreys M, Karlsen S, Nazroo J (2006) Effects of self reported racial discrimination and deprivation on Māori health and inequalities in New Zealand: cross-sectional study. Lancet 367:2005–2009PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gibbs A, Dawson J, Forsyth H et al (2004) Maori experience of community treatment orders in Otago, New Zealand. ANZJP 38:830–835PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Newton-Howes G, Marsh R (2012), Personality dysfunction and social functioning in schizophrenia. Personality and Mental Health. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pmh.1206/abstract;jsessionid=A4BC7543320232F4BABF08ABA12583EB.d02t04?deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=&userIsAuthenticated=false
  18. 18.
    Otago CTO Study (2000). Patient interview tool used as basis for development of research. Available at: http://www.otago.ac.nz/law/otagoCTO/instruments/index.html
  19. 19.
    King M, McKeown E, Warner J, Ramsay A, Johnson K, Cort C, Davidson O (2003) Mental health and quality of life of gay men and lesbians in England and Wales Controlled, cross-sectional study. Br J Psychiatry 183(6):552–558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Swartz M, Swanson J, Wagner H, Burns B, Hiday V, Bothrum R (1999) Can involuntary outpatient commitment reduce hospital recidivism? Findings from a randomized trial with severely mentally ill individuals. Am J Psychiatry 156:1968–1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Atkinson C, Zwick R (1982) The client satisfaction questionnaire: psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome. Eval Progr Plan 5(3):233–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moran P, Leese M, Lee T (2003) Standardised Assessment of Personality–Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS): preliminary validation of a brief screen for personality disorder. Br J Psychiatry 183:228–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Covi L (1973) SCL-90: an outpatient psychiatric rating scale: preliminary report. Psychopharmacol Bull 9:13–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tyrer P, Nur U, Carwford M et al (2005) The social functioning questionnaire: a rapid and robust measure of perceived functioning. Int J Soc Psychiatry 51(3):265–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giles Newton-Howes
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Cameron J. Lacey
    • 3
  • Doug Banks
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Psychological MedicineUniversity of Otago, WellingtonWellington SouthNew Zealand
  2. 2.Imperial CollegeLondonUK
  3. 3.Maori Indigenous Health Institute (MIHI) and Department of Psychological MedicineUniversity of OtagoChristchurchNew Zealand
  4. 4.Whatever It Takes TrustHawkes BayNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations