Housing First improves subjective quality of life among homeless adults with mental illness: 12-month findings from a randomized controlled trial in Vancouver, British Columbia
- First Online:
- 1.3k Downloads
This study used an experimental design to examine longitudinal changes in subjective quality of life (QoL) among homeless adults with mental illness after assignment to different types of supported housing or to treatment as usual (TAU, no housing or supports through the study). We hypothesized that subjective QoL would improve over time among participants assigned to supported housing as compared to TAU, regardless of the type of supported housing received or participants’ level of need.
Participants (n = 497) were stratified by level of need (“high” or “moderate”) and randomly assigned to Housing First (HF) in scattered-site apartments, HF in a congregate setting (high needs only), or TAU. Linear mixed-effects regression was used to model the association between study arm and self-reported QoL at baseline and at 6 and 12 months post-baseline by need level.
Based on the adjusted overall score on the QoL measure, participants randomized to HF reported significantly greater overall QoL as compared to TAU, regardless of need level or type of supported housing at both 6 and 12 months post-baseline. Scores on the safety and living situation subscales were significantly greater for both high and moderate need participants assigned to supported housing regardless of type at both 6 and 12 months post-baseline as compared to TAU.
Despite multiple health and social challenges faced by homeless individuals with mental illness, HF in both scattered-site and congregate models results in significantly greater perceived QoL as compared to individuals who do not receive HF even after a relatively short period of time.
KeywordsHousing first Homelessness Mental illness Quality of life Randomized controlled trial
- 1.Sussman S (1998) The first asylums in Canada: a response to neglectful community care and current trends. Can J Psychiatr 43:260–264Google Scholar
- 5.Frankish C, Hwang S, Quantz D (2005) Homelessness and health in Canada: research lessons and priorities. Can J Pub Health 96:S23–S29Google Scholar
- 6.Schutt RK (2011) Homelessnes, housing, and mental illness. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 14.Hubley A, Russel L, Palepu A, Hwang S (2012) Subjective quality of life among individuals who are homeless: a review of current knowledge. Soc Indic Res doi:10.1007/s11205-012-9998-7
- 22.Oliver JP, Mohamad H (1992) The quality of life of the chronically mentally ill: a comparison of public, private and voluntary residential provisions. Br J Soc Work 22:39–404Google Scholar
- 24.Goering PN, Streiner DL, Adair C, Aubry T, Barker J, Distasio J et al (2011) The At Home/Chez Soi trial protocol: a pragmatic, multi-site, randomised controlled trial of a Housing First intervention for homeless individuals with mental illness in five Canadian cities. BMJ Open 1(2):e000323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E et al (1998) The mini-international neuropsychiatric interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry 59(Suppl 20):22–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Barker S, Barron N, McFarland B et al (1994) Multnomah community ability scale. Network Behavioral Health and Multnomah County, OregonGoogle Scholar
- 29.Marsden J, Gossop M, Stewart D, Best D, Farrell M, Strang J (1998) The Maudsley addiction profile (MAP): a brief instrument for treatment outcome research. Development and user manual. National Addiction Centre/Institute of Psychiatry, London. http://www.iop.kcl.ac.uk/iopweb/blob/downloads/locator/l_346_MAP.pdf. Accessed 25 April 2012
- 33.Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
- 34.StataCorp (2011) Stata statistical software: release 12. StataCorp LP, College StationGoogle Scholar