Nonsuicidal self-harm and suicide attempts in adolescents: differences in kind or in degree?
The purpose of the present study was to measure the prevalence of self-harm (SH) behaviours and examine potential differences in characteristics among adolescents reporting on self-harm (SH), depending on whether they had attempted suicide (SA), performed nonsuicidal self-harm (NSSH), or both.
Cross-sectional survey of 11,440 adolescents aged 14–17 years in the city of Oslo, Norway. Responses regarding measures of lifetime SH and risk factors were collected. The response rate was 92.7 %. Data were analysed by segregating SH responses into the categories of NSSH, SA, and NSSH + SA.
Among all respondents, 4.3 % reported NSSH, 4.5 % reported SA, 5.0 % reported both NSSH and SA, and 86.2 % reported no SH. The group reporting to have engaged in both behaviours comprised more girls and reported more suicidal ideation, problematic lifestyles, poorer subjective health, and more psychological problems compared with the other groups. The four groups could be distinguished by one discriminant function that accounted for most of the explained variance.
Our findings suggest that NSSH and SA are parts of the same dimensional construct in which suicidal ideation carries much of the weight in adolescents from a school-based sample. They also indicate the group of adolescents who seems to alternate between NSSH and SA is more burdened with mental ill-health and behavioural problems compared with others. These adolescents should therefore be targeted by clinicians and school health personnel for identification and provision of adequate help and services.
KeywordsSelf-harm Suicide attempts Adolescents General population
The assistance of John Eriksen, PhD, and of the Norwegian Social Research (NOVA) is gratefully acknowledged. Finance was supported by the Norwegian Extra Foundation for Health and Rehabilitation through EXTRA funds and from the National Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention, University of Oslo, Norway. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 6.Lewinsohn PM, Rohde P, Seeley JR (1996) Adolescent suicidal ideation and attempts: prevalence, risk factors, and clinical implications. Clin Psychol 3:25–46Google Scholar
- 20.Shaffer D, Jacobson CM (2011) Proposal to the DSM-V childhood disorder and mood disorder work groups to include non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) as a DSM-V disorder. American Psychiatric Association. http://www.dsm5.org/Proposed%20Revision%20Attachments/APA%20DSM-5%20NSSI%20Proposal.pdf. Accessed 15 January 2011
- 29.Madge N, Hewitt A, Hawton K, Wilde EJ, Corcoran P, Fekete S, Heeringen KV, Leo DD, Ystgaard M (2008) Deliberate self-harm within an international community sample of young people: comparative findings from the Child and Adolescent Self-harm in Europe (CASE) Study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 49(6):667–677PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Harter S (1988) Manual for the self-perception profile for adolescents. University of Denver, DenverGoogle Scholar
- 38.Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum Associates, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
- 39.Klecka WR (1980) Discriminant analysis. Sage, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
- 46.Pena J, Matthieu M, Zayas L, Masyn K, Caine E (2012) Co-occurring risk behaviors among White, Black, and Hispanic US high school adolescents with suicide attempts requiring medical attention, 1999–2007: implications for future prevention initiatives. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 47:29–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 50.Hawton K, Rodham K, Evans E (2006) By their own young hand. Deliberate self-harm and suicidal ideas. Jessica Kingsley, LondonGoogle Scholar