Predicting community violence from patients discharged from acute mental health units in England
To investigate the validity of risk factors and established risk measures in predicting community violence in an acute mental health sample up to 20 weeks post-discharge.
Prospective cohort follow-up study conducted between January 2006 and August 2007. Baseline assessments were conducted while participants were inpatients. The measures were rated following interview with the participants, record review and speaking to someone who knows the person well (e.g. friend, relative, carer). Baseline measures were then compared with frequency and severity of violence in the community post-discharge at 20 weeks.
In the 20-week period post-discharge, 29 (25.4%) of the 114 participants were violent. All the risk measures and measures of impulsiveness and anger were predictive of violence where p < 0.05. The HCR-20 total, psychopathy and clinical factors were strongly correlated with the frequency of violence where p < 0.05.
The risk factors and risk measures that have been found to be predictive in forensic samples are also predictive in acute mental health samples, although the effects are not as large. Future research needs to be conducted with a larger sample to include investigation of differences in risk factors based on gender and social support. Services and clinicians need to consider how to integrate findings into useful frameworks to support decisions and contribute to managing risk. This should assist in identifying interventions aimed at preventing community violence.
KeywordsViolence Risk assessment Acute psychiatry Community
We are very grateful to Professor John Monahan from the University of Virginia, USA , for all his support and advice with this work. This study was supported by a grant from the Department of Health National Forensic Research and Development programme.
Conflict of interest
- 1.Reed J (1997) Risk assessment and clinical risk management: the lessons from recent inquiries. Br J Psychiatry 170(supp. 32):4–7Google Scholar
- 2.Royal College of Psychiatrists (2008) Rethinking risk to others in mental health services. Final report of scoping group. CR150, June, RCP, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 6.Hodgins S (2009) Editorial: the interface between general and forensic psychiatric services. Eur Psychiatry 24(6):354–355Google Scholar
- 10.Webster C, Harris G, Rice M, Cormier C, Quinsey V (1994) The violence prediction scheme: assessing dangerousness in high risk men. University of Toronto, Centre of Criminology, TorontoGoogle Scholar
- 11.Webster CD, Douglas K, Eaves D, Hart S (1997) HCR-20: assessing risk for violence—version 2. Simon Fraser University, British Columbia, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- 12.Hart S, Cox D, Hare R (1995) The hare PCL: SV: Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version. Multi-Health Systems Incorporated, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 13.Klassen D, O’Connor WA (1989) Assessing the risk of violence in released mental patients: a cross-validation study. J Consult Clin Psychol 1:75–81Google Scholar
- 16.Monahan J, Steadman H (eds) (1994) Violence and mental disorder: developments in risk assessment. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 18.Mulvey EP, Shaw E, Lidz CW (1994) Why use multiple sources in research on patient violence in the community? Crim Behav Mental Health 4:253–258Google Scholar
- 20.Monahan J (2006) A jurisprudence of risk assessment: forecasting harm among prisoners, predators and patients. Virg Law Rev 92(3):391–435Google Scholar
- 22.Novaco RW (2003) The Novaco anger scale and provocation inventory (NAS-PI). Western Psychological Services, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
- 23.Barratt E (1994) Impulsiveness and aggression. In: Monahan J, Steadman H (eds) Violence and mental disorder: developments in risk assessment. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 61–80Google Scholar
- 24.Kay SR, Opler LA, Fizbein A, Ramirez P, White L (2000) The positive and negative syndrome scale: users manual. Multi-Health Systems, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
- 27.Monahan J, Steadman HJ, Silver E, Appelbaum PS, Robbins PC, Mulvey EP et al (2001) Rethinking risk assessment: the MacArthur study of mental disorder and violence. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 29.Widiger TA, Trull TJ (1994) Personality disorders and violence. In: Monahan J, Steadman H (eds) Violence and mental disorder: developments in risk assessment. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 203–226Google Scholar
- 31.McMurran M (2002) Personality disorder. Expert paper. National R&D Programme on Forensic Mental Health, EnglandGoogle Scholar
- 32.Coid J, Yang M (2010) The impact of psychopathy on violence among the household population of Great Britain. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol.***Google Scholar
- 33.McCusker PJ (2007) Issues regarding the use of the classification of violence risk (COVR) assessment instrument. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 51:676–685Google Scholar
- 37.Heilbrun K (2002) Violence risk: from prediction to risk management. In Carson D, Bull R (eds) Handbook of psychology in legal contexts, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, NY, pp 127–143Google Scholar
- 39.Doyle M, Dolan M (2006) Evaluating the validity of anger regulation problems, interpersonal style, and disturbed mental state for predicting inpatient violence. Behav Sci Law 24(6):783–798Google Scholar
- 40.Chemtob CM, Novaco RW, Hamada RS, Gross DM (1997) Cognitive-behavioural treatment for severe anger in post-traumatic stress disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol 139:1262–1266Google Scholar