Mental health services in the health accounts: the Czech Republic
Policy makers as well as health services researchers lack information on financial flows within national mental health systems. The studies that are available use different methodologies and hence it is difficult to make any comparisons. The aim of this study was to modify the existing health accounting framework and apply it to describe and analyse the financial flows within a national mental health system.
Mental health expenditures are classified by the three-dimensional methodology of OECD health accounts that is extended by two other dimensions for the purpose of the study.
The framework of five-dimensional mental health accounts is introduced and applied to mental health expenditure in the Czech Republic, 2006. Mental health expenditure is estimated to be 4.14% of the total health expenditure. Mental health expenditure is classified based on its source of financing, provider industry, health-care function, cost category and diagnostic group.
Health expenditure estimates present the most detailed information on resource allocation in the mental health system of the Czech Republic. The application of the standardized framework in other countries can improve the quality of international comparisons. On the national level, especially if the time series are available, mental health accounts can serve as a useful tool for strategic resource allocation decisions. This is particularly useful for the countries that plan changes in resource allocation directed from institutional to community-based care.
KeywordsHealth accounts Mental health expenditure Czech Republic
- 1.Czech Statistical Office (2008) Vysledky zdravotnickych uctu 2000–2006 [Results of Health Accounts 2000–2006]. Czech Statistical Office, PragueGoogle Scholar
- 3.Dlouhy M (2009) Economic aspects of mental health in the Czech Republic. Polit Ekon 57:792–800Google Scholar
- 4.The General Health Insurance Fund of the Czech Republic (2008) The Yearbook of the General Health Insurance Fund of the Czech Republic. VZP CR, PragueGoogle Scholar
- 5.Horak P (2007) Direct cost of the General Health Insurance Fund to psychiatric care. Presentation at the meeting of the Czech Society of Psychiatry, Prague, March 8, 2007Google Scholar
- 8.Institute of Health Information and Statistics (2007) Psychiatric Care 2006. Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, PragueGoogle Scholar
- 9.Institute of Health Information and Statistics (2008) Economic Information on Health Care 2006. Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, PragueGoogle Scholar
- 11.Kitzlerova E, Howardova A, Pubal K, Kalisova L, Sekot M, Bakova N, Cihal L, Raboch J (2005) Economic aspects of daily psychiatric care II: comparison of patients in daily care and classical hospitalization. Ceska Slov Psychiatr 101:148–154Google Scholar
- 12.Knapp M (2002) Mental health: familiar challenges, unprecedented opportunities? Eurohealth 8:21–22Google Scholar
- 13.Knapp M, McDaid D, Mossialos E, Thornicroft G (eds) (2007) Mental health policy and practice across Europe: the future direction of mental health care. Open University Press, MaidenheadGoogle Scholar
- 14.OECD (2000) A system of health accounts, version 1.0. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
- 15.Office of National Statistics (2004) SHA Guidelines. Office of National StatisticsGoogle Scholar
- 16.Pec O (2003) Naklady na peci o dusevne nemocne v roce 2001 [The cost of care about the mentally ill in 2001]. In Transformace oboru psychiatrie, Amepra, PragueGoogle Scholar
- 18.Scheffler RM, Potucek M (eds) (2008) Mental health care reform in the Czech and Slovak Republics, 1989 to the present. Karolinum Press, PragueGoogle Scholar
- 19.World Health Organization (2003) Guide to producing national health accounts with special applications for low-income and middle-income countries. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar