Mental health services in the health accounts: the Czech Republic

  • Martin Dlouhy
Original Paper



Policy makers as well as health services researchers lack information on financial flows within national mental health systems. The studies that are available use different methodologies and hence it is difficult to make any comparisons. The aim of this study was to modify the existing health accounting framework and apply it to describe and analyse the financial flows within a national mental health system.


Mental health expenditures are classified by the three-dimensional methodology of OECD health accounts that is extended by two other dimensions for the purpose of the study.


The framework of five-dimensional mental health accounts is introduced and applied to mental health expenditure in the Czech Republic, 2006. Mental health expenditure is estimated to be 4.14% of the total health expenditure. Mental health expenditure is classified based on its source of financing, provider industry, health-care function, cost category and diagnostic group.


Health expenditure estimates present the most detailed information on resource allocation in the mental health system of the Czech Republic. The application of the standardized framework in other countries can improve the quality of international comparisons. On the national level, especially if the time series are available, mental health accounts can serve as a useful tool for strategic resource allocation decisions. This is particularly useful for the countries that plan changes in resource allocation directed from institutional to community-based care.


Health accounts Mental health expenditure Czech Republic 



This research was supported by the project “Finance and Mental Health Services Training in Czech Republic/Central Europe”, funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health John E. Fogarty International Center (5 D43 TW005810-07), and by the project P403/10/0041 “Financing and Resource Allocation in Mental Health Care in Central and Eastern Europe”, funded by the Czech Science Foundation.


  1. 1.
    Czech Statistical Office (2008) Vysledky zdravotnickych uctu 2000–2006 [Results of Health Accounts 2000–2006]. Czech Statistical Office, PragueGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dlouhy M (2004) Mental health care system and mental health care expenditures in the Czech Republic. J Ment Health Policy Econ 7:159–165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dlouhy M (2009) Economic aspects of mental health in the Czech Republic. Polit Ekon 57:792–800Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    The General Health Insurance Fund of the Czech Republic (2008) The Yearbook of the General Health Insurance Fund of the Czech Republic. VZP CR, PragueGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Horak P (2007) Direct cost of the General Health Insurance Fund to psychiatric care. Presentation at the meeting of the Czech Society of Psychiatry, Prague, March 8, 2007Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hu T-W (2006) An international review of the national cost estimates of mental illness, 1999–2003. J Ment Health Policy Econ 9:3–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hu TW, He Y, Zhang M, Chen N (2007) Economic costs of depression in China. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 42:110–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Institute of Health Information and Statistics (2007) Psychiatric Care 2006. Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, PragueGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Institute of Health Information and Statistics (2008) Economic Information on Health Care 2006. Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, PragueGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jacob KS, Sharan P, Mirza I, Garrido-Cumbrera M, Seedat S, Mari JJ, Sreevinas V, Saxena S (2007) Mental health system in countries: where are we now? Lancet 370:1061–1077PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kitzlerova E, Howardova A, Pubal K, Kalisova L, Sekot M, Bakova N, Cihal L, Raboch J (2005) Economic aspects of daily psychiatric care II: comparison of patients in daily care and classical hospitalization. Ceska Slov Psychiatr 101:148–154Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Knapp M (2002) Mental health: familiar challenges, unprecedented opportunities? Eurohealth 8:21–22Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Knapp M, McDaid D, Mossialos E, Thornicroft G (eds) (2007) Mental health policy and practice across Europe: the future direction of mental health care. Open University Press, MaidenheadGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    OECD (2000) A system of health accounts, version 1.0. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Office of National Statistics (2004) SHA Guidelines. Office of National StatisticsGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pec O (2003) Naklady na peci o dusevne nemocne v roce 2001 [The cost of care about the mentally ill in 2001]. In Transformace oboru psychiatrie, Amepra, PragueGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Raciborska DA, Hernández P, Glassman A (2008) Accounting for health spending in developing countries. Health Aff 27:1371–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Scheffler RM, Potucek M (eds) (2008) Mental health care reform in the Czech and Slovak Republics, 1989 to the present. Karolinum Press, PragueGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    World Health Organization (2003) Guide to producing national health accounts with special applications for low-income and middle-income countries. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Informatics and StatisticsUniversity of Economics PraguePrague 3Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations