Violence and delayed social independence among young adult British men

  • Jeremy CoidEmail author
  • Min Yang
Original Paper



To explain why a subgroup of young men aged 20–24 years do not follow the general trend within the adult general population, of declining violence with age.


A cross-sectional survey of 8,397 adults in households in Great Britain in 2000. Computer-assisted interviews to measure self-reported violence and psychiatric morbidity.


Young men age 20–24 years had the same high prevalence of self-reported violence as those 16–19 years (52 vs 50%; P = 0.737), contrasting with women whose violence demonstrated a progressive decline (24.1 vs 14.5%; P = 0.002). This age-related gender difference was explained primarily by young men who continued to live at home with their parents (OR = 2.53; 95%CI 1.23–5.20), with smaller effects from childhood conduct disorder (OR = 1.56; 95%CI 0.75–3.21), and hazardous drinking (OR = 2.23; 95%CI 0.76–6.56). Young men living at home were only 4.3% of all male respondents but yielded an attributable risk fraction of 21.4% reporting victim injury.


The persisting high prevalence of violence among young adult men is explained by delay in moving to social independence. Public health interventions to reduce effects of known risk factors for violence must consider progressive economic and social changes in young men’s lifestyles in westernised countries.


Men’s violence Public health Alcohol misuse Social independence 



The survey was conducted by Office of National Statistics and was funded by the Department of Health.


  1. 1.
    Krug EG, Dahlberg LL, Mercy JA, Zwi A, Lozano R (eds) (2002) World report on violence and health. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shepherd JP (1998) Tackling violence. BMJ 316:879–880PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shaw M, Tunstall H, Dorling D (2004) Increasing inequalities in risk of murder in Britain: trends in the demographic and spatial distribution of murder, 1981–2000. Health Place (in press)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Graham K, Leonard KE, Room R et al (1998) Current directions in research on understanding and preventing intoxicated aggression. Addiction 93:659–676CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sivarajasingam V, Shepherd JP (2001) Trends in community violence in England and Wales 1995–1998: an accident and emergency department perspective. Emerg Med J 18:105–109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Denno DW (1994) Gender, crime and the criminal law defenses. J Crim Law Criminol 85:80–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Singleton N, Bumpstead R, O’Brien M, Lee A, Meltzer H (2001) Psychiatric morbidity among adults living in private households, 2000. The Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coid J, Yang M, Roberts A, Ullrich S, Moran P, Bebbington P, Brugha T, Jenkins R, Farrell M, Lewis G, Singleton N (2006) Violence and psychiatric morbidity in a national household population—a report from the British Household Survey. Am J Epidemiol 164:1199–1208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elliott DS (1994) Serious violent offenders: onset, developmental course, and termination—The American Society of Criminology 1993 presidential address. Criminology 32:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    First MB, Gibbon M, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Benjamin L (1997) Structured Clinical Interviews for DSM-IV Axis-II personality disorders. American Psychiatric Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bebbington P, Nayani T (1995) The Psychosis Screening Questionnaire. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 5:11–19Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lewis G, Pelosi A, Araya RC, Dunn G (1992) Measuring psychiatric disorder in the community: a standardised assessment for lay-interviewers. Psychol Med 22:465–486CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Saunders J, Grant M (1992) AUDIT: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: guidelines for use in primary healthcare. World Health Organisation, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bohn MJ, Babor TF, Kranzler HR (1995) The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): validation of a screening instrument for use in medical settings. J Stud Alcohol 56:423–432PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Swanson JW, Holzer CEIII, Ganju VK, Jono RT (1990) Violence and psychiatric disorder in the community: evidence from the epidemiologic catchment area surveys. Hosp Community Psychiatry 41:761–770PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Link BG, Andrews HA, Cullen FT (1992) The violent and illegal behavior of mental patients reconsidered. Am Sociol Rev 57:275–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stueve A, Link BG (1997) Violence and psychiatric disorders: results from an epidemiological study of young adults in Israel. Psychiatr Q 68:327–342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rasbash J, Browne W, Goldstein H, Yang M, Plewis I, Healy M et al (2000) A user’s guide to MLwiN Multilevel models project. Institute of Education University of London, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Coid J, Yang M, Robert A, Ullrich S, Moran P, Bebbington P et al (2006) Violence and psychiatric morbidity in the national household population of Great Britain: public health implications. Br J Psychiatry 189:12–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yang M, Coid J (2009) Gender differences in psychiatric morbidity and violent behaviour among a household population in Great Britain. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 42:599–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Elbogen EB, Johnson SC (2009) The intricate links between violence and mental disorder: results from the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry 66:152–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wilkinson R, Pickett K (2009) The spirit level: why more equal societies almost always do better. Allen Lane/Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Warr M (2002) Companions in crime: the social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reiss AJ, Roth JA, Jeffrey A (1993) Appendix A. The development of an individual potential for violence. In: Reiss AJ, Roth JA, Jeffrey A (eds) Understanding and preventing violence. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 357–403Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Plant M, Plant M (2006) Binge Britain: alcohol and the national response. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    MacAndrews C, Edgerton RB (1969) Drunken comportment: a social explanation. Aldine Publishing Company, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hobbs D, Hadfield P, Lister S (2005) Bouncers: violence and governance in the night-time economy. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shepherd J, Farrington D (2003) The impact of antisocial lifestyle on health. BMJ 326:834–835CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Settersten RA, Furstenberg FF, Rumbaut RG (eds) (2005) On the Frontier of Adulthood: Theory, Research and Public Policy. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bynner J, Elias P, McKnight A, Pan H, Pierre G (2002) Young people’s changing routes to independence. Published for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation by York Publishing Services, YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ferri E, Bynner J, Wadsworth M (eds) (2003) Changing Britain, changing lives: three generations at the turn of the century. Institute of Education, University of London, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Beaglehole R, Bonita R (1997) Public health at the crossroads. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Forensic Psychiatry Research UnitLondonUK

Personalised recommendations