Narrating uncertainties about treatment of mental health conditions

  • Frances L. RapportEmail author
  • Gabi S. Jerzembek
  • Marcus A. Doel
  • Aled Jones
  • Matteo Cella
  • Keith R. Lloyd
Original Paper



Integration of patient views in mental health service planning is in its infancy despite service provision being clearly dominated by narratives from professional consultations and medical records. We wished to clarify perceptions of uncertainty about mental health conditions from a range of provider and user perspectives (patients, carers, parents, mental health service providers) and understand the role of narratives in mental health research.


(1) To explore the utility of qualitative research methods, particularly narrative content analysis in mental health research, and (2) identify aspects of uncertainty in mental health service users and providers.


Four hundred and six free text responses were considered as one element of an existing questionnaire about uncertainties about mental health treatments, collected from mental healthcare users and providers through charities, the Mental Health Research Network in Wales, health professionals and websites. Free text responses were analysed using narrative content analysis, an elaborate and rigorous research technique that involves groups of analysts working independently and together over extended group sessions.


Three main themes emerged across respondent groups: “medication and treatment options”, “objectification and marginalisation of patient” and “integrity of service delivery”. Within these, patients embraced the opportunity to write about their illness at length, whilst carers’ and parents’ main concerns were about how patients were dealing with their illnesses, the services they were getting and the side effects of treatments. Carers and patients’ parents perceived themselves to be the ‘go-between’, carrying messages between patients and professionals, in order to enable services to function. Mental health service providers and professionals considered uncertainties surrounding medication and treatment from an ‘evidence-base’ perspective, concentrating on medication choices and the adoption of new approaches to care rather than patient need and expectation. Patients wanted to know what alternatives were available to the drug regimes they were on and felt their opinions were rarely listened to. As a consequence patients felt marginalised by the health systems there to support them and by society as a whole.


Narrative content analysis can help distil large amounts of free text data and enable their successful interpretation. Listening to patients’ voices should become an integral part of routine service evaluation and may help bring patient expectation more in line with service organisation and delivery towards an optimal delivery of care.


Mental health questionnaire Uncertainties in treatment Narrative content analysis Professional and user views 


  1. 1.
    Lloyd K, Rose Fenton (2006) Identifying uncertainties about the effects of treatments for schizophrenia. J Ment Health 15:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rose D (2003) Collaborative research between users and professionals: peaks and pitfalls. Psychiatr Bull 27:404–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Philpot M, Collins C, Trivedi P, Treloar A, Gallagher S, Rose D (2004) Eliciting users’ views of ECT in two mental health trusts with a user-designed questionnaire. J Ment Health 13(4):403–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wessley S (2007) A defense of the randomised controlled trial in mental health. BioSocieties 2:115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Priebe S, Slade M (2001) Evidence in Mental Health Care. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leichsenring F (2004) Randomised controlled versus naturalistic studies: a new research agenda. Bull Menninger Clin 68(2):137–151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Slade M, Priebe S (2001) Are randomised controlled trials the only gold that glitters? (Editorial). The Br J Psychiatry 179:286–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    van Manen M (1990) Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    van Manen M (1997) From meaning to method. Qual Health Res 7(3):345–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brown C, Lloyd KR (2001) Qualitative research methods in psychiatric research. Adv Psychiatr Treat 7:350–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Naylor CD (1995) Grey zones of clinical practice: identifying some limits to evidence-based medicine. Lancet 345(8953):840–842CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Green J, Britten N (1998) Qualitative research and evidence-based medicine. BMJ 316(7139):1230–1232PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rapport F (ed) (2004) New qualitative methodologies in health and social care research. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rapport F, Wainwright P, Elwyn G (2005) Of the edgelands: broadening the scope of qualitative methodology. Med Humanit 31(1):37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Walsh SH (2004) The clinician’s perspective on electronic health records and how they can affect patient care. BMJ 328:1184–1187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Murray M (2003) Narrative psychology. In: Smith JA (ed) Qualitative psychology. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mishler E (2004) Storylines: craftartists’ narratives of identity. Harvard University Press, HarvardGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bruner JS (2002) Making stories: law, literature, life. Harvard University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jones EE (1986) Interpreting interpersonal behavior: the effects of expectancies. Science 234:41–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Snyder M, Stukas AA Jr (1999) Interpersonal processes: the interplay of cognitive, motivational, and behavioral activities in social interaction. Annu Rev Psychol 50:273–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Savage-Rumbaugh S, Murphy J, Sevcik RA, Brakke KE, Williams SL, Rumbaugh D (1993) Language comprehension in Ape and Child. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 58(233):3–4Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Frank A (1995) The wounded storyteller: body, illness, and ethics. University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hurwitz B, Greenhalgh T, Skultans V (eds) (2004) Narrative research in health and illness. BMJ Books, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Elwyn G, Gwyn R (1999) Stories we hear and stories we tell: analysing talk in clinical practice. BMJ 318:186–188PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Picker Institute (2008) UK PCT Patient Survey 2008 Hillingdon Primary Care Trust. Executive summary.;
  26. 26.
    Campbell JL, Ramsay J, Green J (2001) Age, gender, socioeconomic, and ethnic differences in patients’ assessments of primary health care. Qual Health Care 10:90–95CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Thornicroft G, Leese M, Tansella M, Howard L, Toulmin H, Herran A, Schene A (2002) Gender differences in living with schizophrenia. A cross-sectional, European, multi-site study. Schizophr Res 57:191–200CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gibson PG, Talbot PI, Toneguzzi RC (2005) Consultations for Asthma: will greater patient involvement deliver better health? Thorax 60:177–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chalmers I (2004) Well informed uncertainties about the effects of treatments. Br Med J 328:475–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wancat J, Freidl M, Krautgartner M, Friedrich F, Matschnig T, Unger A, Gossler R, Fruhwald S (2008) Gender aspects of parents’ needs of schizophrenia patients. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 43(12):968–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Coffey A, Atkinson P (1996) Making sense of qualitative data. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rashidian A, Eccles MP, Russell I (2008) Falling on stony ground? A qualitative study of implementation of clinical guidelines’ prescribing recommendations in primary care. Health Policy 85:148–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hollway W, Jefferson T (2000) The practice of cooperative inquiry: research “with” rather than “on” people. In: Reason P, Bradbury H (eds) Handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schwandt TA (1997) Qualitative inquiry: a dictionary of terms. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gotell E, Brown S, Ekman SL (2008) The influence of caregiver singing and background music on vocally expressed emotions and moods in dementia care: a qualitative analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 46(4):422–430CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schmoll BJ (1993) Qualitative research. In: Bork CE (ed) Research in physical therapy. J B Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 83–124Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Robson C (2002) Real world research. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) (2002) Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edn. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frances L. Rapport
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gabi S. Jerzembek
    • 2
  • Marcus A. Doel
    • 3
  • Aled Jones
    • 4
  • Matteo Cella
    • 1
  • Keith R. Lloyd
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Health Information, Research and Evaluation (CHIRAL), School of MedicineSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
  2. 2.Public Health Improvement Research Network (PHIRN) Cardiff Institute of Society, Health and EthicsCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
  3. 3.Department of Geography, Centre for Urban Studies and the EnvironmentSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
  4. 4.Institute for Health ResearchSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK

Personalised recommendations