Evidence of the effectiveness of a specialist vocational intervention following first episode psychosis: a naturalistic prospective cohort study
- 849 Downloads
Employment rates among people with severe mental illness are low and work has beneficial effects on mental health. There is now good evidence of the effectiveness of a specialist vocational intervention (supported employment) in people with schizophrenia. However, the potential benefits of modifying this model for use in first episode psychosis cohorts remain relatively untested.
The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a specialist vocational intervention in aiding vocational recovery following the onset of first episode psychosis. In a naturalistic prospective cohort study, 114 first episode psychosis service users were followed up during 12 months of engagement with an early intervention service; 44 resident in an area where a vocational intervention was available and 70 in an area where it was not.
The main finding in our study was that having access to the specialist vocational intervention was a statistically significant independent predictor of vocational recovery during 12 months of follow-up (after adjusting for confounders). Service users who had access to the intervention had odds of achieving vocational recovery 3.53 times greater than those who did not (OR = 3.53, 95% CI = 1.25–10.00).
This study provides further preliminary evidence of the effectiveness of a specialist vocational intervention following first episode psychosis. This is an important outcome from the perspective of service users and clinicians alike (as well as having wider societal value). Other important predictors of vocational recovery cannot be modified by the time a first episode psychosis emerges.
KeywordsFirst episode psychosis Early intervention Vocational rehabilitation Supported employment Education
We acknowledge the hard work and commitment of the Camden & Islington Early Intervention Service clinical team in collecting and entering the data. Joanna Morrison, Occupational Therapist, played a major role in the development of the VIBE service.
- 4.Burns T, Catty J, White S, Becker T, Koletsi M, Fioritti A, Rossler W, Tomov T, van Busschbach J, Wiersma D, Lauber C; for the EQOLISE Group (2008) The impact of supported employment and working on clinical and social functioning: results of an international study of individual placement and support. Schizophr Bull [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- 5.Crowther R, Marshall M, Bond G, Huxley P (2001) Vocational rehabilitation for people with severe mental illness. Cochrane database of systematic reviews Issue 2. Art. No.: CD003080Google Scholar
- 6.Department of Health (2001) The mental health policy implementation guide. Department of Health, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 8.Fisher H, Theodore K, Power P, Chisholm B, Fuller J, Marlowe K, Aitchison KJ, Tanna R, Joyce J, Sacks M, Craig T, Johnson S (2008) Routine evaluation in first episode psychosis services: feasibility and results from the MiData project. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 43:960–967CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Jeppesen P, Abel M, Thorup A, Peterson L, Ohlenschlaeger J, Christensen TO, Krarup G, Jorgensen P, Nordentoft M (2006) Association between premorbid functioning, duration of untreated psychosis and two-year outcome in first episode psychosis [abstract]. Schizophr Res 86(Suppl 1):s43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Kay SR, Opler LA, Fiszbein A (1992) Positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS): manual. Multi-Health Systems Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 12.Killackey EJ, Jackson HJ, Gleeson J, Hickie IB, McGorry PD (2006) Exciting career opportunity beckons! Early intervention and vocational rehabilitation in first episode psychosis: employing cautious optimism. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 40:951–962Google Scholar
- 19.Marwaha S, Balachandra S, Johnson, S (2008) Clinicians attitudes to the employment of people with psychosis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- 22.Office for National Statistics (2006) Annual population survey. Office for National Statistics, NewportGoogle Scholar