Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

, Volume 44, Issue 10, pp 805–814 | Cite as

Housing services for people with mental disorders in England: patient characteristics, care provision and costs

  • Stefan PriebeEmail author
  • Marya Saidi
  • Anna Want
  • Roshni Mangalore
  • Martin Knapp
Original Paper


Background and aims

Since de-institutionalisation, housing services have taken a central role in the care of patients with severe mental illness. Yet, little is known about the characteristics of patients in different housing services, what care they receive, and what costs are generated. This study aimed to assess patient characteristics, care provision and costs in different types of housing services in England.


In 12 representative local areas in England, 250 housing services were randomly selected. Information on services, characteristics of randomly selected patients and care received were obtained from managers.


Data from 153 services (61% response rate) and 414 patients were analysed. Most patients receive support with activities of daily living and are involved in some sort of occupational activities. 52% have a care co-ordinator in a community mental health team. Care provision and costs differed significantly between care homes, supported housing services and floating support services.


Quality standards may have to be defined and applied to ensure that all patients in housing services receive appropriate care. More input of mental health services may be required for the rehabilitation and recovery of patients.


Housing Mental disorders Patient characteristics Care provision Costs 



We would like to thank the Steering Group and experts who supported the study: Dr. Frank Holloway (Chair), Mike Aimey, Zoe Robinson, Dr. Helen Killaspy, Prof. Gyles Glover, Vanessa Pinfold, David Morris, Dr. Walid Fakhoury, Nicola Vick, Sue Talbot, Dr. Dirk Claassen, Prof. Sarah Curtis, and Dr. Giovanni di Girolamo, and in particular Dr. Michael Clark who organised the Steering Group. We are also grateful to the managers who provided the information in the study and Dr. Duolao Wang for his statistical advice.

Conflict of interest statement

The study was funded by the Department of Health.


  1. 1.
    Priebe S, Badesconyi A, Fioritti A, Hansson L, Kilian R, Torres-Gonzales F, Turner T, Wiersma D (2005) Reinstitutionalisation in mental health care: comparison of data on service provision from six European countries. Br Med J 330:123–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Priebe S, Frottier P, Gaddini A, Kilian R, Lauber C, Martinez-Leal R, Munk-Jørgensen P, Walsh D, Wiersma D, Wright D (2008) Mental Health Care Institutions in nine European Countries, 2002–2006. Psychiatr Serv 59:570–573PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Priebe S (2004) Institutionalization revisited—with and without walls. Acta Psychiatr Scand 110:81–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fakhoury WKH, Murray A, Shepherd G, Priebe S (2002) Research in supported housing. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 37:301–315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Santone G, de Girolamo G, Falloon I, Fioritti A, Micciolo R, Picardi A, Zanalda E (2005) The process of care in residential facilities—a national survey in Italy. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 40:540–550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lelliott P, Audini B, Knapp M, Chisolm D (1996) The Mental Health Residential Care Study: classification of facilities and description of residents. Br J Psychiatry 169:139–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Priebe S, Saidi M, Kennedy J, Glover G (2008) How to select representative geographical areas in mental health service research? A method to combine different selection criteria. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 43(12):1004–1007PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Slade M, Loftus L, Phelan M, Thornicroft G, Wykes T (1999) The Camberwell assessment of need. Gaskell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beecham J, Knapp M et al (2001) Costing psychiatric interventions. In: Thornicroft G (ed) Measuring mental health needs, 2nd edn. Gaskell, London, pp 200–224Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Curtis L (2007) Unit costs of health and social care. University of Kent, PSSRU, KentGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hawthorne G (2008) Perceived social isolation in a community sample: its prevalence and correlates with aspects of peoples’ lives. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 43:140–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fakhoury WKH, Priebe P, Quraishi M (2005) Goals of new long-stay patients in supported housing: a UK study. Int J Soc Psychiatry 50:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Knapp M, Chisholm D, Astin J, Lelliott P, Audini B (1997) The cost consequences of changing the hospital-community balance: the mental health residential care study. Psychol Med 27:681–692PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chisholm D, Knapp M, Astin J, Beecham J, Audini B, Lelliot P (1997) The costs of residential care for people with mental health problems in eight services. J Ment Health 6:85–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chisholm D, Knapp M, Astin J, Beecham J, Audini B, Lelliot P (1997) The mental health residential care study: the ‘hidden costs’ of provision. Health Soc Care Community 5:162–172Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lloyd-Evans B, Johnson S, Slade M (2007) Assessing the content of mental health services: a review of measures. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 42:673–682PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Priebe
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Marya Saidi
    • 1
  • Anna Want
    • 1
  • Roshni Mangalore
    • 2
  • Martin Knapp
    • 2
  1. 1.Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Barts and the London School of Medicine and DentistryQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Personal Social Services Research UnitLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK
  3. 3.Unit for Social and Community PsychiatryNewham Centre for Mental HealthLondonUK

Personalised recommendations